Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Ray (1972)
Are Conservatism Scales IrreversibleThe British journal of social and clinical psychology, 11
Ray Ray (1971)
An “attitude to authority” scaleAustralian Psychologist, 6–31
J. Ray (1971)
The Questionnaire Measurement of Social ClassJournal of Sociology, 7
L. Cronbach, W. Warrington (1951)
Time-limit tests: Estimating their reliability and degree of speedingPsychometrika, 16
H. Titus (1968)
F Scale Validity Considered Against Peer Nomination CriteriaThe Psychological Record, 18
Ray Ray (1971)
The questionnaire measurement of social classAustralia and New Zealand Journal of Sociology, 7
B. Bass (1967)
Social behavior and the orientation inventory: a review.Psychological bulletin, 68 4
E. Hollander (1957)
The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration.Journal of Applied Psychology, 41
J. Ray (1970)
Christianism … The Protestant Ethic among UnbelieversInternational Journal of Christianity & Education, os-13
Cronbach Cronbach (1951)
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of testsPsychometrika, 16
JOHN J. RAY University of New South Wales To most employers the desirability of task orientation in his employees would be hard to overstate. Selection of employees with high levels of task orientation is, therefore, a most relevant goal. The present paper is concerned to look a t some of the foundations upon which such selection might be built. Two major lines of work bearing on the measurement of task versus interaction orientation are by Bales (1958) and Bass (1967). The Bales work provides a system for scoring actual behaviour whereas Bass has constructed an ipsatively scored personality cum attitude inventory. The Bass inventory is known as âOriâ and provides in all, three choices-the third being âselforientation.â It is desired in this paper to question the validity of Bassâ measure and provide alternatives to it. I n his review of work with Ori, Bass (1967) concludes: âWith a few interesting exceptions, in small groups and large organizations, the task-oriented person is upgraded by observers, peers and superiors. H e is more tolerant of deviant opinion, conflicting ideas and directive supervision, although he does better himself 88 a permissive supervisor. . . . The interaction-oriented person i downgraded generally.
Personnel Psychology – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1973
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.