Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1977)
A preliminary attempt to determine the duration of a motor program
R. Schmidt (1976)
Control Processes In Motor SkillsExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 4
E. Buckolz, O. Rugins (1978)
The relationship between estimates of foreperiod duration and simple time reaction.Journal of motor behavior, 10 3
R. Schmidt (1975)
A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.Psychological Review, 82
Jack Adams, A. Welford (1968)
The fundamentals of skill
F. Henry, D. Rogers (1960)
Increased Response Latency for Complicated Movements and A “Memory Drum” Theory of Neuromotor ReactionResearch Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 31
S. Klapp (1977)
Response programming, as assessed by reaction time, does not establish commands for particular muscles.Journal of motor behavior, 9 4
R. Schmidt, D. Russell (1972)
Movement velocity and movement time as determiners of degree of preprogramming in simple movements.Journal of experimental psychology, 96 2
D. Glencross (1973)
The effects of changes in direction, load, and amplitude of movement on gradation of effort.Journal of motor behavior, 5 4
K. Newell, L. Hoshizaki, M. Carlton (1979)
Movement time and velocity as determinants of movement timing accuracy.Journal of motor behavior, 11 1
(1978)
Unpublished data
P. Merton (1972)
How we control the contraction of our muscles.Scientific American, 226 5
R. Schmidt (1969)
Movement time as a determiner of timing accuracy.Journal of experimental psychology, 79 1
H. Zelaznik, Diane Shapiro, Karl Newell (1978)
On the structure of motor recognition memory.Journal of motor behavior, 10 4
B. Dudding, A. Duncan (1975)
Quality Control and Industrial StatisticsApplied statistics, 24
J. Kelso, D. Southard, D. Goodman (1979)
On the coordination of two-handed movements.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 5 2
R. Schmidt, Janice White (1972)
Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills.Journal of motor behavior, 4 3
G. Langolf, D. Chaffin, J. Foulke (1976)
An investigation of fitts' law using a wide range of movement amplitudes.Journal of motor behavior, 8 2
K. Lashley (1917)
THE ACCURACY OF MOVEMENT IN THE ABSENCE OF EXCITATION FROM THE MOVING ORGANAmerican Journal of Physiology, 43
P. Fitts (1954)
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of experimental psychology, 47 6
(1903)
Le mouvement. Paris: Doin
R. Schmidt, H. Zelaznik, J. Frank (1978)
Sources of Inaccuracy in Rapid Movement
(1979)
uni-directional movements, motor programs do not "meter out" time
A. Wing, A. Kristofferson (1973)
Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responsesPerception & Psychophysics, 14
S. Keele, M. Posner (1968)
Processing of visual feedback in rapid movements.Journal of experimental psychology, 77 1
S. Klapp (1977)
REACTION TIME ANALYSIS Of PROGRAMMED CONTROLExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 5
(1970)
Training for the production of memorized movement patterns (Tech. Rep. 26)
R. Woodworth (1899)
THE ACCURACY OF VOLUNTARY MOVEMENTThe Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 26
(1978)
The learning oj generalized motor programs
Judith Smith (1978)
Sensorimotor Integration during Motor Programming
J. Kelso, D. Southard, D. Goodman (1979)
On the nature of human interlimb coordination.Science, 203 4384
R. Burke, V. Edgerton (1975)
Motor Unit Properties and Selective Involvement In MovementExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 3
J. Michon (1967)
Timing in temporal tracking
(1977)
Preliminaries to a theory of action with reference to vision
S. Keele (1968)
Movement control in skilled motor performance.Psychological Bulletin, 70
Theoretical accounts of the speed–accuracy trade-off in rapid movement have usually focused on within-movement error detection and correction and have consistently ignored the possibility that motor-output variability might be predictably related to movement amplitude and movement time. The present author proposes a theory of motor-output variability that accounts for the relationship among the movement amplitude, movement time, the mass to be moved, and the resulting movement error. Predictions are derived from physical principles; empirical evidence supporting the principles is presented for 3 movement paradigms––single-aiming responses, reciprocal movements, and rapid-timing tasks––and the theory and data are discussed in terms of past theoretical accounts and future research directions. (33 ref)
Psychological Review – American Psychological Association
Published: Sep 1, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.