Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

LOCATION OF RECEPTORS FOR TONIC NECK REFLEXES

LOCATION OF RECEPTORS FOR TONIC NECK REFLEXES I. D, FOR Department University for DEERING, AND T. H. LING of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, July 13, Pennsylvania (Received publication 1950) IN THEIR classic research on neck reflexes (1, 2), Magnus and de Kleijn limited the receptive field to the distribution of the first three cervical nerves. Whether the end organs concerned lie in the joints, in the muscles, or in both locations they left an open question. Neither in their work nor elsewhere in the literature have we found a single experiment designed to distinguish between these possibilities. In the present paper two types of experiment are presented which make such a discrimination. In the first, all the muscles innervated from the upper three cervical segments were either sectioned, or denervated, or both; in the second, joint innervation from the first three cervical nerves was cut with as little damage as possible to muscles and their nerves. RESULTS Of a series of eight acute experiments on cats with both labyrinths destroved immediatelv after decerebration, six animals developed responses FIG. 1. Acute head tions preparation with section of all muscles connecting and axis with atlas. Responses to rotation of neck. In all Figures, are diagrammatic. Outlines of posture are http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Neurophysiology The American Physiological Society

LOCATION OF RECEPTORS FOR TONIC NECK REFLEXES

Loading next page...
 
/lp/the-american-physiological-society/location-of-receptors-for-tonic-neck-reflexes-c4Ldi01ZZZ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
The American Physiological Society
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 the American Physiological Society
ISSN
0022-3077
eISSN
1522-1598
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

I. D, FOR Department University for DEERING, AND T. H. LING of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, July 13, Pennsylvania (Received publication 1950) IN THEIR classic research on neck reflexes (1, 2), Magnus and de Kleijn limited the receptive field to the distribution of the first three cervical nerves. Whether the end organs concerned lie in the joints, in the muscles, or in both locations they left an open question. Neither in their work nor elsewhere in the literature have we found a single experiment designed to distinguish between these possibilities. In the present paper two types of experiment are presented which make such a discrimination. In the first, all the muscles innervated from the upper three cervical segments were either sectioned, or denervated, or both; in the second, joint innervation from the first three cervical nerves was cut with as little damage as possible to muscles and their nerves. RESULTS Of a series of eight acute experiments on cats with both labyrinths destroved immediatelv after decerebration, six animals developed responses FIG. 1. Acute head tions preparation with section of all muscles connecting and axis with atlas. Responses to rotation of neck. In all Figures, are diagrammatic. Outlines of posture are

Journal

Journal of NeurophysiologyThe American Physiological Society

Published: May 1, 1951

There are no references for this article.