Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Jones, A. Neale, M. Nash, Rick Remortel, J. Wickham, K. Riitters, R. O'Neill (2001)
Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: A multiple watershed study from the United States Mid-Atlantic RegionLandscape Ecology, 16
Lester Yuan, S. Norton (2003)
Comparing responses of macroinvertebrate metrics to increasing stressJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 22
Endreny Endreny, Wood Wood (2003)
Catchment weighting of export coefficients to map critical phosphorus loading areasJournal of the American Water Resources Association, 39
F. Fitzpatrick, B. Scudder, Bernard Lenz, D. Sullivan (2001)
EFFECTS OF MULTI‐SCALE ENVIRONMENTAL CHARACTERISTICS ON AGRICULTURAL STREAM BIOTA IN EASTERN WISCONSIN 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37
Richard Smith, G. Schwarz, R. Alexander (1997)
Regional interpretation of water‐quality monitoring dataWater Resources Research, 33
B. Bohn, J. Kershner (2002)
Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach.Journal of environmental management, 64 4
R. Lowrance, L. Altier, R. Williams, S. Inamdar, J. Sheridan, D. Bosch, R. Hubbard, D. Thomas (2000)
REMM: The Riparian Ecosystem Management ModelJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55
Scheuler Scheuler (1995)
The importance of imperviousnessWatershed Protection Techniques, 1
E. Jones, G. Helfman, J. Harper, P. Bolstad (1999)
Effects of Riparian Forest Removal on Fish Assemblages in Southern Appalachian StreamsConservation Biology, 13
N. Gove, R. Edwards, L. Conquest (2001)
EFFECTS OF SCALE ON LAND USE AND WATER QUALITY RELATIONSHIPS: A LONGITUDINAL BASIN‐WIDE PERSPECTIVE 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37
E. Ciolkosz, W. Waltman, T. Simpson, R. Dobos (1989)
Distribution and genesis of soils of the northeastern United StatesGeomorphology, 2
S. Bell, M. Fonseca, Little Motten (1997)
Linking Restoration and Landscape EcologyRestoration Ecology, 5
Mary Power, N. Brozović, Collin Bode, D. Zilberman (2005)
Spatially explicit tools for understanding and sustaining inland water ecosystemsFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3
S. Preston, J. Brakebill (1999)
Application of spatially referenced regression modeling for the evaluation of total nitrogen loading in the Chesapeake Bay watershed
R. Wissmar, R. Beschta (1998)
Restoration and management of riparian ecosystems: a catchment perspectiveFreshwater Biology, 40
R. Patrick, Drew Palavage (1994)
The Value of Species as Indicators of Water Quality
E. Bernhardt, M. Palmer, J. Allan, G. Alexander, Katie Barnas, S. Brooks, J. Carr, S. Clayton, C. Dahm, J. Follstad-Shah, D. Galat, D. Galat, S. Gloss, P. Goodwin, D. Hart, B. Hassett, R. Jenkinson, S. Katz, G. Kondolf, P. Lake, Rebecca Lave, J. Meyer, T. O'donnell, L. Pagano, B. Powell, E. Sudduth (2005)
Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration EffortsScience, 308
E. Tabacchi, D. Correll, R. Hauer, G. Pinay, A. Planty‐Tabacchi, R. Wissmar (1998)
Development, maintenance and role of riparian vegetation in the river landscapeFreshwater Biology, 40
W. Hilsenhoff (2017)
An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream PollutionThe Great Lakes Entomologist
R. Sponseller, E. Benfield, H. Valett (2001)
Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communitiesFreshwater Biology, 46
H. Hynes (1975)
The stream and its valley, 19
Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 9
D. Weller, T. Jordan, D. Correll (1998)
HEURISTIC MODELS FOR MATERIAL DISCHARGE FROM LANDSCAPES WITH RIPARIAN BUFFERSEcological Applications, 8
E. Calabrese, L. Baldwin (1998)
Hormesis as a biological hypothesis.Environmental Health Perspectives, 106
J. Allan (2004)
Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream EcosystemsAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35
Gregory Gregory, Swanson Swanson, McKee McKee, Cummins Cummins (1991)
Ecosystem perspectives of riparian zonesBioScience, 41
David Allan, D. Erickson, J. Fay (1997)
The influence of catchment land use on stream integrity across multiple spatial scalesFreshwater Biology, 37
Bohn Bohn, Kershner Kershner (2002)
Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a catchment approachJournal of Environmental Management, 64
D. Goldberg (1988)
Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning
D. Haith, L. Shoemaker (1987)
GENERALIZED WATERSHED LOADING FUNCTIONS FOR STREAM FLOW NUTRIENTSJournal of The American Water Resources Association, 23
D. Montgomery, J. Buffington (1993)
CHANNEL CLASSIFICATION, PREDICTION OF CHANNEL RESPONSE, AND ASSESSMENT OF CHANNEL CONDITION
S. Gregory, F. Swanson, W. McKee, K. Cummins (1991)
An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian ZonesFocus on links between land and waterBioScience, 41
Bernhardt Bernhardt, Palmer Palmer, Allan Allan (2005)
Synthesizing U.S. River RestorationScience, 308
T. Endreny, E. Wood (2003)
WATERSHED WEIGHTING OF EXPORT COEFFICIENTS TO MAP CRITICAL PHOSPHOROUS LOADING AREAS 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39
W. Junk (1989)
The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems, 106
T. Moser, D. Lindeman, P. Wigington, M. Schuft, J. Sickle (2000)
Methods for multi-spatial scale characterization riparian corridors
B. Sweeney (1992)
Streamside Forests and the Physical, Chemical, and Trophic Characteristics of Piedmont Streams in Eastern North AmericaWater Science and Technology, 26
(1995)
Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters.
R. Lowrance, S. Lee, R. Williams, P. Shreeram, D. Bosch, J. Sheridan, D. Thomas, R. Hubbard (1998)
The riparian ecosystem management model; simulator for ecological processes in riparian zones, 1
Lowrance Lowrance, Altier Altier, Williams Williams, Imamdar Imamdar, Bosch Bosch, Hubbard Hubbard, Thomas Thomas (2000)
The riparian ecosystem management modelJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 55
C. Amoros, G. Bornette (2002)
Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplainsFreshwater Biology, 47
J. Vogelmann, S. Howard, Limin Yang, Charles Larson, B. Wylie, J. Driel (2001)
COMPLETION OF THE 1990S NATIONAL LAND COVER DATA SET FOR THE CONTERMINOUS UNITED STATES FROM LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER DATA AND ANCILLARY DATA SOURCESPhotogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67
T. Gomi, R. Sidle, J. Richardson (2002)
Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems, 52
E. Glenn (2003)
Book reviewRiparian Areas, Functions and Strategies for Management: National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002, 428 pp.Environmental Science & Policy, 6
J. Miller (1993)
Ground water atlas of the United States, 2
J. Ward, K. Tockner, D. Arscott, C. Claret (2002)
Riverine landscape diversityFreshwater Biology, 47
Haith Haith, Shoemaker Shoemaker (1987)
Generalized watershed loading functions for stream flow nutrientsWater Resources Bulletin, 23
D. Strayer, R. Beighley, Lisa Thompson, S. Brooks, C. Nilsson, G. Pinay, R. Naiman (2003)
Effects of Land Cover on Stream Ecosystems: Roles of Empirical Models and Scaling IssuesEcosystems, 6
R. Alexander, Richard Smith, G. Schwarz (2000)
Effect of stream channel size on the delivery of nitrogen to the Gulf of MexicoNature, 403
Summary 1. The restoration of native, forested riparian habitats is a widely accepted method for improving degraded streams. Little is known, however, about how the width, extent and continuity of forested vegetation along stream networks affect stream ecosystems. 2. To increase the likelihood of achieving restoration goals, restoration practitioners require quantitative tools to guide the development of restoration strategies in different catchment settings. We present an empirically based model that establishes a relationship between a ‘stress’ imposed at different locations along a stream by the spatial pattern of land cover within catchments, and the response of biologically determined ecosystem characteristics to this stress. The model provides a spatially explicit, quantitative framework for predicting the effects of changes in catchment land cover composition and spatial configuration on specific characteristics of stream ecosystems. 3. We used geospatial datasets and biological data for attached algae and benthic macroinvertebrates in streams to estimate model parameters for 40 sites in 33 distinct catchments within the mid‐Atlantic Piedmont region of the eastern U.S. Model parameters were estimated using a genetic optimisation algorithm. R2 values for the resulting relationships between catchment land cover and biological characteristics of streams were substantially improved over R2 values for spatially aggregated regression models based on whole‐catchment land cover. 4. Using model parameters estimated for the mid‐Atlantic Piedmont, we show how the model can be used to guide restoration planning in a case study of a small catchment. The model predicts the quantitative change in biological characteristics of the stream, such as indices of species diversity and species composition, that would occur with the implementation of a hypothetical restoration project.
Freshwater Biology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.