Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Misapplications Reviews: The Capital Punishment Controversy: Part I

Misapplications Reviews: The Capital Punishment Controversy: Part I Few questions in the social sciences have spawned so much empirical research as whether capital punishment can deter murders. An odd collection of inquirers that includes sociologists, lawyers, economists, psychologists, statisticians, and philosophers have examined data that cross the boundaries between nations and centuries; their methods of analysis have ranged from the techniques of multivariate statistics to the recitation of juicy anecdotes. Professor Ernest Van den Haag (1) was not abusing reality when he characterized capital punishment research as a cottage industry.The conclusions of the studies have been almost as diverse as their methods and data sources. While a majority have discerned no significant association between execution and homicide levels, several have supported the hypothesis of strong deterrent effects. Some have argued that executions postpone some killings but do not avert them, while others claim to have shown that capital sanctions actually stimulate homicides. (This last finding could make sense if, because of the death penalty, those who kill deem it urgent also to kill witnesses and to resist police capture with gunfire.) An unsurprising result of this cacophony is that partisans of all positions in the capital punishment controversy can cite scholarly investigations to buttress their viewpoints. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Interfaces INFORMS

Misapplications Reviews: The Capital Punishment Controversy: Part I

Barnett, Arnold
Interfaces , Volume 13 (3): 5 – Jun 1, 1983
Download PDF
5 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/informs/misapplications-reviews-the-capital-punishment-controversy-part-i-cgSOJkZVw0

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
INFORMS
Copyright
Copyright © INFORMS
Subject
Research Article
ISSN
0092-2102
eISSN
1526-551X
DOI
10.1287/inte.13.3.24
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Few questions in the social sciences have spawned so much empirical research as whether capital punishment can deter murders. An odd collection of inquirers that includes sociologists, lawyers, economists, psychologists, statisticians, and philosophers have examined data that cross the boundaries between nations and centuries; their methods of analysis have ranged from the techniques of multivariate statistics to the recitation of juicy anecdotes. Professor Ernest Van den Haag (1) was not abusing reality when he characterized capital punishment research as a cottage industry.The conclusions of the studies have been almost as diverse as their methods and data sources. While a majority have discerned no significant association between execution and homicide levels, several have supported the hypothesis of strong deterrent effects. Some have argued that executions postpone some killings but do not avert them, while others claim to have shown that capital sanctions actually stimulate homicides. (This last finding could make sense if, because of the death penalty, those who kill deem it urgent also to kill witnesses and to resist police capture with gunfire.) An unsurprising result of this cacophony is that partisans of all positions in the capital punishment controversy can cite scholarly investigations to buttress their viewpoints.

Journal

Interfaces – INFORMS

Published: Jun 1, 1983

Keywords: Keywords : public policy ; judicial/legal: crime prevention

There are no references for this article.