Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications

Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications Journal Pre-proof Wenpeng Zhang, Ruijun Jian, Jing Zhao, Yikun Liu, Yu Xia PII: S0022-2275(22)00052-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100219 Reference: JLR 100219 To appear in: Journal of Lipid Research Received Date: 16 March 2022 Revised Date: 19 April 2022 Accepted Date: 20 April 2022 Please cite this article as: Zhang W, Jian R, Zhao J, Liu Y, Xia Y, Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications, Journal of Lipid Research (2022), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100219. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications 1 2 2 1 2* Wenpeng Zhang, Ruijun Jian, Jing Zhao, Yikun Liu, Yu Xia State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry & Chemical Biological, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China *Corresponding Author Information: Yu Xia E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0001-8694-9900 Short title: Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry Funding sources: This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0800903) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22074075). Journal Pre-proof Abstract In-depth structural characterization of lipids is an essential component of lipidomics. There has been a rapid expansion of mass spectrometry methods that are capable of resolving lipid isomers at various structural levels over the past decade. These developments finally make deep-lipidotyping possible, which provides new means to study lipid metabolism and discover new lipid biomarkers. In this review, we discuss recent advancements in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods for identification of complex lipids beyond the species (known headgroup information) and molecular species (known chain composition) levels. These include identification at the levels of carbon-carbon double bond (C=C) location and sn-position as well as characterization of acyl chain modifications. We also discuss the integration of isomer-resolving MS/MS methods with different lipid analysis workflows and their applications in lipidomics. The results showcase the distinct capabilities of deep-lipidotyping in untangling the metabolism of individual isomers and sensitive phenotyping by using relative fractional quantitation of the isomers. Keywords: lipidomics; tandem mass spectrometry; lipid isomers; double bond location; sn-position; glycerolipids; glycerophospholipids; branched-chain fatty acids; liquid chromatography; phenotyping Journal Pre-proof The systems approach to lipids, which aims to reveal a complete network of the function and metabolism of lipids, and their interactions with other biomolecules in a biosystem, came into shape as “lipidomics” in early 2000s (1). Ever since, lipidomics has gradually emerged from being a subdiscipline of metabolomics into a more independent research field due to many differences in experimental approaches employed for the two cohorts of molecules (2). In the past decade, lipidomics has been increasingly employed in both basic and translational research while the lipidomic data are found instrumental in understanding metabolic changes of many diseases, including COVID-19 (3, 4). The advancement of lipidomics is supported by a variety of analytical techniques, especially mass spectrometry (MS), which provides a solution to large-scale lipid profiling. The development of state-of- the-art MS instruments, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods tailored for lipid analysis, and the hyphenation of MS with high performance separation methods are the three pillars underpinning the fast growth of lipidomics. This is witnessed by over 2000 publications in the year of 2020 from searching the Web of Science with key words, “lipidomics” or “lipid analysis + mass spectrometry”, an almost two-fold increase from that of 2016 (https://www.webofscience.com/, 2022/01/03). Echoing the heated research activity was the establishment of the International Lipidomics Society (ILS) in 2019, with a clear goal to foster the development of new technologies, resources, data standardization (5), and etc. (https://lipidomicssociety.org/). This review is mainly focused on lipid identification, a rudimentary step to all lipid profiling experiments. The challenge of lipid identification stems from structural complexity and diversity. LIPIDMAPS curates more than 40,000 lipid molecules, which are classified into eight categories. Among them, fatty acids (FAs) are the building blocks of complex lipids, such as glycerolipids (GLs), glycerophospholipids (GPLs), and sphingolipids (SLs) (6). Conventionally, lipid extracts are analyzed by gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS) after saponification, in which the fatty acyls in complex lipids are hydrolyzed and esterified (7). This approach provides comprehensive profiling of total fatty acids from a given lipidome; however, the information of the intact structures of complex lipids is lost. Owing to the invention of soft ionization methods, namely electrospray ionization Journal Pre-proof (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), complex lipids can be detected and structurally probed as a whole when coupled with MS/MS methods (8, 9). These two approaches can be classified as the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” lipid analysis, respectively, analogous to the terminology used in proteomics. Complete identification of a complex lipid, using a GPL molecule as an example, requires an elucidation on the following six structural levels (Fig. 1): 1) identity of the head group, 2) acyl composition, 3) location(s) of carbon-carbon double bond(s) (C=Cs), 4) sn-position of the acyl/ether chains on the glycerol backbone, 5) identity and location of functional group substitution (e.g., methyl branching and hydroxylation), and 6) the stereochemistry of C=Cs and the chiral centers. By employing high-resolution MS and MS/MS, information of the first two levels can be obtained from routine lipidomic profiling workflows. However, any variation at deeper structural levels (levels 3-6 in Fig. 1) leads to a plethora of isomeric structures that cannot be differentiated by mass measurements alone. So far, the high-performance separation methods are still struggling in providing a universal solution for the separation of lipid isomers. Moreover, due to lack of synthetic standards, even though isomers are separated, they cannot be assigned to a specific structure. The development of novel MS/MS techniques has been a valuable resource for characterizing biomolecules at high sensitivity. Notable examples in proteomics include using electron-based ion activation methods, i.e., electron-capture dissociation (ECD)(10) and electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), (11) to locate the site of phosphorylation and electron-induced dissociation (EID) to assign the linkage patterns in glycans(12). Similarly, active research efforts have been drawn from the mass spectrometry society on developing new MS/MS methods for top-down lipid analysis over the last decade, establishing deep-lipidotyping as an important tool for structural lipidomics (13). Fig. 1 summarizes the published MS/MS methods for retrieving each level of lipid structural information and corresponding nomenclature suggested by Liebisch et al. (14). Herein, discussions are focused on the recent development and applications of isomer-resolving MS/MS on deeper structural levels (levels 3-5 in Fig. 1), while more Journal Pre-proof mature techniques for the analysis of lipid class and chain composition are not discussed. The readers can find detailed discussion from the classical reviews (15, 16) and books (17, 18) on these topics. Fig. 1. Structural hierarchy of a complex lipid, represented by a phosphatidylethanolamine molecule: PE 16:1(9Z)/20:4(5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z). The “Δ” and “n-” annotations for the locations of C=C are indicated in the structure. The MS/MS methods that have been developed for characterizing at each structural level. *The identified structural levels are named according to Liebisch et al. (14) Lipid characterization at the C=C Location level Unsaturated lipids, of which one or more the fatty acyl chains contain at least one C=C, contribute to a significant portion of a lipidome (19). Studies have revealed close relationships between the C=C locations and cell membrane permeability (20), cholesterol-phospholipid interaction (21), and plasticity of cancer cells (22). Bottom-up analysis on total fatty acids via GC-MS is the gold-standard for profiling, in which identification of FAs is typically achieved through comparisons to that of the authentic standards. Brenna and co-workers developed acetonitrile chemical ionization (ACN-CI) which allowed for independent structural analysis of unsaturated FAMEs when coupled with collision-induced dissociation (CID) (23, 24). Charge-remote fragmentation (CRF) via high energy CID, viz. collision-energy (CE) higher than 1000 eV (lab frame) (25), of the deprotonated FAs, or low energy CID (CE < 200 eV, lab frame) of charge- derivatized FAs produces signature fragmentation pattern around the C=Cs for characterizing unsaturated FAs (26). However, the above methods cannot be directly applied for probing C=C locations in complex lipids. When the ions of complex lipids are subjected to CID, the most common MS/MS methods installed on commercial MS instruments, cleavage of the nonpolar bonds (C-C or C=C) is energetically unfavorable as compared to the polar bonds under charge-directed dissociation, such as ester or phosphoester linkages in complex lipids. Two approaches have been utilized to characterize the locations of C=C in complex lipids (Fig. 2). One involves the development of novel gas-phase ion activation/dissociation methods. These include Journal Pre-proof ozone-induced dissociation (OzID), ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO), metastable atom-activated dissociation (MAD), ion/ion reactions via charge remote fragmentation (CRF) mechanism, and radical-directed fragmentation (RDD). Alternatively, chemical derivatization of C=C to functional groups that can generate informative fragments of C=C locations via CID allows a wider accessibility for labs which do not have access to the specialized instruments. These derivatization methods include the Paternò-Büchi (PB) reaction, epoxidation, and singlet oxygen ( ΔO )-ene reaction. In the following sections, the basic principle of each method for locating C=C is discussed. Fig. 2 The two approaches for locating the C=Cs in lipids by MS. The gas-phase ion activation methods, including OzID, UVPD, CRF, EIEIO, RDD, MAD, etc., initiate fragmentations at or around a C=C. Alternatively, the C=C can be firstly transformed into functional groups that are prone to generating informative fragments in subsequent CID. The transformations can be achieved via the PB reaction, epoxidation, and ΔO -ene reaction. Gas-phase ion activation methods for locating C=C OzID Although ozonolysis is highly specific and efficient for cleaving a C=C in lipids, its application for the analysis of complex lipids has been hampered because of the difficulty in linking the identity of the intact lipid to its ozonolysis products when a mixture of unsaturated lipids undergoes ozonolysis altogether. This challenge is overcome by performing gas-phase ozonolysis of mass-isolated lipid ions inside an ion trapping unit, e.g., a quadrupole ion trap, in a mass spectrometer (27). Following the classic ozonolysis mechanism, the C=C bond is converted into a primary ozonide, which quickly decomposes into an aldehyde ion and a Criegee ion with a constant mass separation of 16 Da. Because of the clear mass relationship between the parent ion (intact lipid) and the two fragments resulting from ozonolysis, the location of C=C in a fatty acyl can be confidently determined (Scheme 1a). This technique was pioneered by Blanksby and co-workers in 2008 and coined as OzID (27). By coupling with different types of soft ionization methods, Journal Pre-proof OzID has been successfully applied for pinpointing the locations of C=C in various classes of lipids, including FAs, GPLs, GLs, and SLs (28). OzID is also incorporated into data-independent shotgun lipidomics workflow for fast profiling of lipids in human plasma (29). Even though the efficiency of gas- phase ozonolysis is approaching unit efficiency, OzID typically requires seconds of reaction time to accumulate detectable C=C diagnostic fragment ions due to the low number density of ozone allowed in an 9 12 −3 ion trap (10 − 10 molecules cm ) (27, 30). This aspect reduces the analysis speed and makes its hyphenation with liquid chromatography (LC) inefficient. To circumvent this limitation, Poad et al. incorporated OzID in a high pressure ion-mobility spectrometry (IMS) cell (31), in which the high number 15 −3 density of ozone (~10 molecules cm ) significantly accelerated ozonolysis, producing abundant C=C fragment ions within 100 ms. High-pressure OzID also facilitates inline coupling with LC separation and its application for the identification of a series of C=C location isomers of GPLs. By conducting ozonolysis in a high-pressure trapping ion funnel of an Agilent 6560 IMS QTOF, OzID is further shortened to 10 ms, thus compatible on the time scale of IMS. In this configuration ozonolysis cannot be conducted on mass- isolated ions; however, the hyphenation with a prior LC and subsequent IMS separations, viz. LC-OzID- IMS-MS, aids in the assignment of ozonolysis products to their associated precursor ions for confident C=C location determination in a non-targeted fashion (32). High pressure-OzID also greatly improves the -1 acquisition rates (up to 5 pixels s ) for MALDI-MS/MS imaging of both C=C and sn-position isomers in biological tissues, which was recently demonstrated on a SYNAPT HDMS G2-Si Q-TOF mass spectrometer (33). Scheme 1. Gas-phase ion dissociation methods for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) OzID, (b) UVPD, and (c) EIEIO. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. UVPD. Brodbelt and Reid groups independently reported the application of 193 nm UVPD for locating C=Cs in lipids in 2017 (34, 35). The dissociation is mainly driven by electronic excitation of a C=C due to the absorption of photons of wavelength around 200 nm. This process subsequently initiates cleavages at Journal Pre-proof the vinylic C-C and forms a pair of diagnostic ions with mass difference of 24 Da (Scheme 1b). Although the mechanistic detail is not entirely clear, it is hypothesized that the diradical formed from the photo- excited C=C is responsible for the vinylic cleavages and several other RDD channels (34). The 193 nm UVPD has been implemented in the HCD cell on Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer and a low-pressure trap on Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer, with 10 laser pulses being used per activation (~20 ms). More recently, 213 nm UVPD, which can be chosen as an add-on module on the Orbitrap mass spectrometers, has been demonstrated for lipid analysis. 213 nm UVPD shows almost identical fragmentation phenomenon as that of 193 nm UVPD; however, it takes longer time (200 ms) for activation owing to its lower power of the laser source (36). The UVPD methods have been applied to different classes of lipids for locating the C=Cs, such as GPLs (34, 37), cardiolipins (38), fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids (36), and SLs (35). It has recently been successfully coupled with LC-MS for enhancing quantitation capability for C=C location isomers (39) and with DESI for isomer-resolving imaging (40). A limitation of UVPD for analysis of C=C location is its inherent low fragmentation efficiency due to low photon absorption by a C=C; thus, it often requires a magnification of the spectrum for the detection of diagnostic ions. Using laser source of higher power or incorporating more efficient chromophores in lipids may help improving the sensitivity for characterizing lipids at the C=C location level. EIEIO EIEIO or electron-induced dissociation (EID) was first developed by Freiser and Cody in 1979 as an alternative dissociation method for singly charged ions (41). This electron-based ion activation concept was adopted for lipid analysis by Baba and Campbell on a modified Q-TOF in 2015 (42) and later by Kane and co-workers on an FT-ICR instrument (43). During EIEIO, positively charged lipid ions are allowed to interact with an electron beam of kinetic energy around 10 eV. Due to electronic excitation of the parent ions, many high energy and radical-directed dissociation channels are activated. This process produces rich fragmentation in lipids, from which multi-level structural information can be extracted from a single EIEIO spectrum, including the identity of head groups, the location of C=C, the configuration of C=C, sn-position, and even the identity of glycans in complex lipids (42, 44-46). This also means that EIEIO is not a fragmentation method specific to C=C. For a saturated fatty acyl chain, EIEIO forms a Journal Pre-proof continuous series of fragment ions differing by CH (14.014 Da) resulting from C-C cleavages along the chain. For an unsaturated fatty acyl chain, the vinylic C-C cleavages and direct C=C cleavages are disfavored relative to the allylic C-C cleavages (Scheme 1c). This difference in relative peak intensities produces a “V” shape fragmentation pattern, which is used for locating a C=C in a fatty acyl chain. However, intrachain fragments generated from the other fatty acyl chains in complex lipids such as in GPLs and GLs may cause interferences and these fragments should be carefully differentiated for confident C=C determination. Computer-assisted spectral interpretation is typically needed for locating C=C from EIEIO (44). Given the complexity of the EIEIO spectra, a prior separation of isobaric or isomeric lipid species is helpful in increasing the confidence for lipid identification. By coupling with differential ion mobility spectrometry (DMS) for fast lipid species separation, more than 400 lipid molecules including GPLs, GLs, SMs, and glycosphingolipids have been annotated at detailed structural levels from porcine brain lipid extracts (47). The ZenoTOF 7600 mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) is installed with an EIEIO module, allowing EIEIO to be more accessible for lipid analysis. Other gas-phase ion activation methods. RDD, CRF, MAD-CID, HAD, and OAD have also been demonstrated for locating the C=Cs in complex lipid structures. These methods rely on accessing radical- directed dissociation or higher energy activation channels to achieve rich fragmentation along fatty acyl chain. The RDD concept for complex lipid analysis was demonstrated by Blanksby and co-workers in 2012 (48). In the RDD approach, lipid molecules are derivatized or complexed with a structural moiety containing a photo-liable aryl-iodine. The modified lipids are ionized by ESI as even-electron ions and then subjected to 266 nm UVPD, from which lipid radical ions are uncaged from the homolytic cleavage of C-I in the gas phase. By applying an additional stage of CID to the radical ions, the site of radical is mobilized from the benzyl radical to the methylene groups along the fatty acyl chain due to an almost uniform hydrogen atom transfer. Subsequent RDD induces intrachain cleavages driven by the stability of the product species, from which a characteristic 12 Da spacing of the intrachain fragments is observed for the site of C=C as compared to 14 Da spacing for saturated fatty acyls. This signature is used in the MS PD- CID experiments for locating C=C in unsaturated lipids. It is worth noting that RDD from the allylic Journal Pre-proof position of the C=C is a prominent fragmentation channel directly resulting from 266 nm UVPD of the aryl-iodine derivatized lipids (49), which facilitates the analysis of C=C location isomers in a mixture of 37 FAs implemented on an LC-MS platform (50). Charge-remote fragmentation (CRF) along the fatty acyl chain has been demonstrated for unsaturated FA analysis via high energy CID of deprotonated anions on sector instruments (51) and later via low energy CID on metal adduct of FA or fixed charged derivatized FA cations (26, 52). McLuckey group used charge inversion ion/ion chemistry to synthesize the metal adduct of FA, e.g. the complex cations between fatty acid and phenanthroline magnesium ([FA-H+MgPhen] ), inside a mass spectrometer; subsequent low energy CID of the complex triggered CRF along the fatty acid chain, leading to the characteristic “V” pattern around a C=C for unsaturated FAs (53) . The same principle was later applied for the structural analysis of GPLs, in which the anions of GPL molecules were firstly fragmentated by CID to generate fatty acid anions before going through charge-inversion ion/ion chemistry and subsequent CID steps (54). Jackson group developed an MS MAD-CID approach, in which the singly charged PC cations was firstly converted to the corresponding radical cations by interreacting with metastable helium atom (~20 eV), then mass-isolated, and fragmented by low energy CID (55). The overall fragmentation pattern induced by MAD-CID is similar to that reported from EIEIO. Takahashi et al. developed hydrogen abstraction dissociation (HAD) and oxygen attachment dissociation (OAD) for the structural analysis of GPLs (56). The interaction between the lipid ions and a neutral hydrogen atom (H•) inside an ion trap induces RDD along the fatty acyl chain. When using OH• and O for the reaction, the C=C is first oxidized and then fragmentated at the adjacent methylene bridges, allowing for the assignment of the C=Cs (56). Due to the requirement of sophisticated MS instrumentation and limited sensitivity, these methods have not yet been applied for large-scale lipid analysis. C=C specific derivatization coupled with MS/MS PB-MS/MS The PB reaction is a [2+2] cycloaddition reaction between an electronically excited ketone or aldehyde and a C=C. The reaction is highly specific to a C=C and can be accomplished in moderate yield (around 30%) within a minute under UV irradiation for a broad range of lipid classes when performed in Journal Pre-proof flow microreactors. Acetone was used as the PB reagent and an ESI solvent in the first demonstration by Ma and Xia in 2014 (57). The reaction was directly performed inside a borosilicate glass emitter of nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI) upon irradiation by a 254-nm UV lamp. In such a process, the unsaturated lipids are derivatized online, ionized, and directly subjected to MS analysis. Two regio-PB products (P and P ) are formed from the cyclization reaction, resulting from two relative orientations of 1 2 the addition (Scheme 2a). Subsequent MS CID of the mixture of PB products generates a pair of C=C diagnostic fragment ions, one containing an olefin at the cleavage site (F ) while the other containing an aldehyde (F ). These ions provide definitive information for pinpointing the locations of the C=Cs. The acetone PB reaction has been incorporated in the shotgun analysis workflow for identification and relative quantitation of fatty acids and several classes of phospholipids in biological samples (58). It has also been online coupled with LC-MS systems, where a photochemical flow microreactor is connected in between the LC unit and the ESI source. By employing acetone as the mobile phase solvent for hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), more than 200 GPLs were identified at the C=C location level from different types of biological samples, including bovine liver extracts, different types of mouse tissue, human plasma, and human breast cancer tissue (59). Improved capability for the identification at the location of C=C level can be achieved for ether vs. diacyl GPL isobaric species, chain composition isomers, and C=C E/Z isomers by coupling the acetone PB reaction with reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) (60). It is noted that MS CID of the PB products typically produces more abundant diagnostic ions in positive ion mode than negative ion mode. For anionic GPLs, such as PG and PI, phosphate methylation can be performed prior to PB-MS/MS in positive ion mode, which improves the limit of identification (LOI, 5 nM for the synthetic standards) (61). Besides, PB-MS/MS has also been incorporated into sampling tip- based devices for the analysis of lipid C=C location isomers in single cells(62). A series of aryl ketones and aldehydes have been developed besides acetone, rendering a flexibility in choosing the most suitable PB reagents for a specific application in lipid analysis (63). For instance, acetyl pyridines (3- and 2-acpy) have been developed as the charge-tagging/switching PB reagents, which improve the limit of identification for nonpolar lipids including FAs, cholesteryl easters (CEs), and GLs down to the Journal Pre-proof 3 4 C=C location level (64, 65). By coupling 2-acpy PB reaction with MS or MS -CID, the locations of C=Cs can be confidently determined with sn-chain specificity for GPLs (66). The high sensitivity of 2-acpy PB- MS/MS further enables single cell lipidomic analysis at the C=C location level (67). A very important aspect of the PB reaction is its combability with different lipid analysis settings, including MS imaging (MSI) and direct analysis (68, 69). Bednarik et al. demonstrated coupling offline on- tissue benzaldehyde PB reaction with MALDI-2-MS/MS (70). Distinct distribution of the Δ9 versus Δ11 C=C isomers of PS 18:1_18:1 was revealed in the white and gray areas of mouse cerebellum. By developing PB molecules which could also function as the MALDI matrix, such as benzophenone and 2- benzoylpyridine, Heiles group demonstrated PB derivatization upon 343 nm laser irradiation during the normal MALDI process. Isomer-resolved MS imaging of PCs at the C=C location level is achieved with high lateral resolution (10 μm) in mouse pancreas tissue sections (71). Scheme 2. Double bond specific derivatization methods coupled with subsequent MS/MS for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) the PB reaction, (b) epoxidation, and (c) ΔO -ene reaction. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. Epoxidation-MS/MS. Epoxidation converts a C=C to a polar and highly strained three-membered ring. By performing CID on the lipid epoxides, a pair of ions different by 16 Da are formed from ring rupture, which allows for the assignment of C=C location (Scheme 2b). Lipid epoxidation can be achieved by reacting with oxidative species formed in situ in a solution or during nanoESI process or with peracids in bulk solution. Zhao et al. developed an epoxidation strategy by blowing helium low-temperature plasma (He-LTP) into FAs dissolved in acetone/water solution (72). Almost quantitative conversion of mono- unsaturated FAs was achieved within one minute. Chemically unstable dioxirane (Scheme 2b) is hypothesized to be the epoxidation reagent. For the analysis of GPLs, acetonitrile is a better solvent for in situ epoxidation via He-LTP, in which peroxycarboximidic acid is likely the oxidant (73). Epoxidation has Journal Pre-proof also been demonstrated via electrochemistry during the process of nanoESI (74) (75). These in situ epoxidation methods have the advantage of facile and fast analysis of unsaturated lipids. The classical epoxidation reaction via meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA) was adopted for lipid analysis by Li group (76) and Hsu group (77), independently. Efficient conversion can be achieved for unsaturated FAs (>70%) and GPLs (26-91%) at room temperature within one hour. The limit of detection of C=C diagnostic ions is at nM range for mono- and poly-unsaturated FAs and sub-μM range for 3 4 GPLs, the latter of which is mainly limited by performing MS for MS CID in negative ion mode (77). The above epoxidation strategy has been integrated with direct fusion ESI, LC-MS, and DESI for imaging lipid C=C location isomers in tissue sections. Very recently, peracetic acid was used as the epoxidation reagent and it was applied for mapping C=C location isomers of FAs in tissues via MALDI-MS/MS (63). Other epoxidation strategies have also been explored; for example, Oxone was used as the epoxidation reagent and applied for the analysis of FA C=C isomers in human plasma samples (78); epoxidation of unsaturated FAs was achieved by pulsed corona discharge generated by triboelectric nanogenerators (79) and by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (80). 1 1 𝚫 O -ene reaction. A C=C can be converted to hydroperoxides by reacting with singlet oxygen ( ΔO ) 2 2 existed in ambient air (81) or formed by photosensitizing (82). MS CID of lipid hydroperoxides produces fragments indicative of C=C locations in unsaturated lipids (Scheme 2c). In the report by Laskin and co- workers (83), rose bengal dissolved in the ESI or nano-DESI spray solution was used as the photosensitizer, while a green laser pointer (532 nm) was used to initiate the formation of ΔO . A reaction yield around 30% can be achieved with reaction time estimated shorter than 250 ms. This method has been demonstrated for ambient imaging of lipid isomers via nano-DESI from animal tissue sections. Characterization at the sn-position level GPLs and GLs are de novo synthesized and dynamically modified for fatty acyl compositions in the cell (84, 85). These processes generate an array of chain compositional isomers as well as sn-isomers. For analysis of GPLs at the sn-position level, selective hydrolysis of the ester bond at sn-1 or sn-2 position via Journal Pre-proof phospholipases A (PLA and PLA ) followed by LC-MS analysis is the gold-standard, albeit of low- 1 2 throughput (86, 87). MS CID of the anions of GPLs typically produces more abundant fragment ions due to neutral loss of the sn-2 chain than the sn-1 fatty acyl chain; thus, their abundance ratios have been used to differentiate the sn-isomers. The ion abundance ratio, however, is dependent on the headgroup, fatty acyl identity, and instrument conditions, rendering a relatively high uncertainty especially for isomer quantitation (88). The analysis of monoacylglycerides (MAGs) and diacylglycerides (DAGs) can be complicated by facile α-hydroxy acyl migration besides their low endogenous abundances (89). Reports on the analysis of MAGs and DAGs at the sn-position level mainly rely on the chemical modification of the free hydroxyl group(s) to reduce acyl migration and produce signature fragmentation patterns for the sn-isomers via 2 2 subsequent MS CID (90, 91). On the other hand, MS CID of the ammonium adduct ions of TAGs forms abundant DAG product ions, which is widely used for identification of GLs at the fatty acyl composition level (92). It is observed that the neutral loss of fatty acyls as free fatty acids from sn‐ 1/3 positions are more favorable than the sn‐ 2 position. However, the abundance ratios of these DAG product ions are also dependent on the fatty acid compositions, especially at the presence of PUFA, making this method less rigorous for differentiating sn-isomers (93). Hsu and Turk showed that further CID of the DAG ions improved differentiation among positional isomers due to an exclusive loss of the sn-2 chain as an 𝛼 ,𝛽 - unsaturated FA (94). However, non-linear effects exist thus complicating its application for the analysis of complex TAG mixtures. In a mechanistic study conducted by Hsu and Turk, they proved that the Cα-H on fatty acyl chains instead of the C -H on glycerol backbone participated in the phospho-head group loss (HOE loss in Scheme 3a) from CID of PC cations ([M + H/Li] ) (95). A preference to removing the Cα-H on sn-2 over sn-1 chain forms a dioxolane ring in the product ions (structure shown in Scheme 3a). This mechanistic insight facilitates the development of a suite of new MS/MS methods for analysis of the sn-isomers of GPLs and GLs. For instance, noticing that the proposed fragment structure contains a newly formed C=C between C1 and C2 of the fatty acyl chain, Blanksby and co-workers conducted MS CID-OzID experiments on GPLs Journal Pre-proof + ([M + Na] ) and proved the formation of the dioxolane-type products as the dominant pathway (96), the structure of which was recently corroborated by cryogenic infrared spectroscopy (cryo-IR) measurements (97). More importantly, OzID of the newly formed C=C in the dioxolane-type products provides fragment ions only containing the sn-1 chain information, allowing definitive assignment of the sn-geometry in GPLs (Scheme 3b). The relative ion abundances of the OzID products can be used to achieve relative quantitation of sn-isomers of GPLs, which are of great value especially when the isomers cannot be chromatographically separated (98). Scheme 3. The MS/MS methods capable of analyzing GPLs and TAGs at the sn-position level. (a) 2 + Formation of a dioxolane-type fragment ion from MS CID of [M + Na] of GPLs. Loss of the sn-2 C𝛼 -H 2/3 is the exclusive pathway involved in the phospho-headgroup loss (-HOE) from MS CID of protonated or metal adduct of GPLs. The dioxolane-type fragment ion contains a C=C newly formed between the first two carbons of the sn-2 acyl chain. For TAGs, the C𝛼 -H can be lost from any of the three sn-positions and thus four structures of dioxolane-type fragment ions are formed if the three chains have different masses. 3 3 3 (b) MS CID-OzID, (c) MS CID-UVPD, and (d) 2-acpy PB coupled with MS CID for analysis of sn- isomer of GLPs. Targeting the unique C=C formed in the dioxolane-type fragment ions, 193 nm UVPD was incorporated in an MS CID-UVPD sequence for the assignment of sn-position isomers of GPLs ([M + Na] ) (34) . UVPD cleaves multiple bonds of the five-membered dioxolane ring, producing more diverse product ions than the CID-OzID approach (Scheme 3c). MS CID of the 2-acpy PB products of GPLs ([M + Na] ) is also capable of forming the dioxolane-type fragment ions. By conducting a further stage of CID, sn-specific product ions can be obtained (Scheme 3d). Using 2-acpy, the PB-MS CID method allows for the identification of the C=C locations and sn-positions in the same mass spectra. Interestingly, the conventional PB reagents such as acetone and benzophenone do not produce abundant dioxolane-type Journal Pre-proof product ions via CID, while the 2-acpy PB products provide about ~20 folds enhancement of the dioxolane- type of product ions (66) . Although the dioxolane-type fragments are also formed from the neutral loss of FA via MS CID of TAG ([M + Na] ), the analysis of a mixture of TAG sn-isomers turns out to be more challenging. This is because MS CID of each sn-pure TAG can produce four dioxolane-type fragments if the three chains are different in mass (Scheme 3a). Further application of OzID/UVPD on these dioxolane product ions will generate FA fragment ions with overlapping m/z to those from the sn-isomers, making independent identification difficult. A combination of sn-resolving separation techniques with these MS/MS methods is most suitable for the identification and quantitation of TAG sn-isomers (99). EIEIO is capable of pinpointing sn-isomers of GPLs and TAGs without a need for isomer separation. Upon EIEIO the fragment peaks resulting from the loss of two fatty acyl chains are diagnostic to the assignment of sn-positions for TAGs (Scheme 4a). The combined loss of the sn-1(or sn-3) and sn-2 fatty acyl chains leads to the formation of a doublet with 2 Da difference in mass, signature for fatty acyl located at either sn-1 or sn-3. The fragmentation scheme for the formation of sn-1 fragments is shown as an example in Scheme 4a. On the other hand, the double loss of sn-1 and sn-3 fatty acyls forms the sn-2 fragment ions as a singlet. For GPLs, EIEIO can induce a cleavage between C1-C2 in the glycerol backbone, forming a distinct sn-2 fragment ion for the sn-position assignment (Scheme 4b) (42). Baba et al. coupled DMS with EIEIO and demonstrated detailed structural analysis of over 300 lipids together with relative quantitation of the sn-isomers of some GPLs and GLs (47). Scheme 4. (a) Formation of the sn-specific fragment ions from EIEIO of TAG ([M +Na] ). The doublet with 2 Da mass difference is a signature for sn-1 or sn-3 fragments while sn-2 fragment appears as a singlet. (b) Formation of the sn-2 fragment from EIEIO of GPL ([M + H] ). (c) Formation of the sn-1 fragment via 2 - from MS CID of PC or LPC ([M + HCO ] ). Journal Pre-proof - The phosphocholine head group establishes strong hydrogen bonding with bicarbonate anion (HCO ). 2 - MS CID of this complex ([M + HCO ] ) induces a homolytic C-N cleavage within the choline moiety and generates the carbon-centered radical anions which further dissociate to from the sn-1 fragment (Scheme 4c). Based on this RDD pathway, Zhao et al. established an LC-MS/MS workflow for the identification and quantitation of the sn-isomers of PCs (100) and LPCs in lipid extracts (101). In another report, Heiles group 2+ showed that 213 nm UVPD of PC ([M + Fe] ) produced signature fragment ions for the assignment of sn- isomers of PCs from lipid extracts (102). Characterization of chain modifications Methyl branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) are abundant in bacteria, skin secretions, rumen tissue, and milk (103). Brenna and co-workers have developed EI-MS CID (104) and covalent adduct chemical ionization (CACI)- MS CID for structural elucidation and quantitation of the methyl esters of BCFAs (105, 106). These methods enabled the discovery of fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) as the desaturase for branched chain and odd chain saturated fatty acids (107). Cyclopropane modification is commonly found in various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (108). This modification is catalyzed by cyclopropane fatty acid synthase in which process a methylene group derived from S-adenosylmethionine is inserted to a C=C (109). The cyclopropane group has a weak absorption around the wavelength of 200 nm and can be dissociated by 193 nm or 213 nm UVPD via dual cross-ring C−C cleavages on both sides of the cyclopropane ring. The diagnostic ions are mass separated by 14 Da, different from UVPD of a C=C, thus enabling the identification and localization of cyclopropane on a fatty acyl chain. Brodbelt and co-workers integrated 213 nm UVPD with LC-MS/MS and identified a series of cyclopropyl GLPs in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and mycolic acids in Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) and tuberculosis lipid extracts (110). CRF and RDD are both capable of inducing C-C cleavages along fatty acyl chain. This unique aspect has been utilized to characterize various chain modifications. Han and co-workers demonstrated that the distinct MS CID fragmentation patterns of chain modification isomers were generated from fixed-charge derivatization of FAs. The types of modifications being evaluated include nitrosylation, hydroxylation, and Journal Pre-proof methyl branching (26). Blanksby group and Julian group applied RDD for the analysis of chain modifications via UVPD of C-I bond in covalently modified lipids (50) or lipids non-covalently complexed with a photocaged radical initiator (48). One common feature of these derivatization reagents is that they all contain a photolabile aryl–iodide motif, which can liberate an aryl radical upon 266 nm UVPD at high efficiency. Acyl chain modifications include methyl branching, cyclopropane modification, hydroxylation on FAs can be identified and localized from performing MS UVPD-CID. By employing a new generation of photocaged radical initiator, 1-(3-(aminomethyl)-4-iodophenyl)pyridin-1-ium (4-I-AMPP ), Blanksby and co-workers found that 266 nm UVPD was efficient in producing direct photolysis of C-C bonds adjacent to the hydroxyl group (111). Additionally, RDD produces a distinctive 29 Da spacing for simple hydroxyl fatty acids (HFAs) derivatized by 4-I-AMPP+, while a 30 Da spacing was observed for polyunsaturated HFAs, e.g., isomers from the hydroxyeicosatetraenoic (HETE) acid and hydroxyeicosapentaenoic (HEPE) acid families. This method is compatible with LC-MS analysis time frame and has a potential to be employed for the identification of chain modified fatty acids in biological matrices. The RDD approach via CID of the [M + HCO ] (M: PC, LPC, SM) has been utilized for the characterization of chain modifications (101). By integrating on an LC-MS system, the iso- and anteiso- branched LPC 17:0 isomers have been identified and relatively quantified (101). In another report, C-2 hydroxylation of N-acyls and iso-methyl branched sphingosine base were identified from SMs of C. elegans (112). The intrachain fragments generated from these methods are of relatively low ion abundances, thus limiting the sensitivity of this method. Quantitation of lipid isomers Given that lipid isomers are derived from distinct biosynthetic pathways, quantitation of lipids at various isomeric levels is important to deepen the understanding of lipid metabolism. For situations where the isomers can be well resolved by separations and the synthetic standards are available, isomer quantitation is straightforward by constructing the calibration curve from their synthetic standards. The above situation, Journal Pre-proof however, is rarely encountered, especially for complex lipids. The more frequent cases are that either the synthetic standards of the lipid isomers are not available, nor can they be separated under typical separation conditions used in large-scale lipid profiling. Under these circumstances isomer-resolving MS/MS methods as discussed in previous sections are instrumental in providing quantitation of lipid isomers. For instance, a linear calibration curve can be obtained by plotting the abundance ratios of the diagnostic ions as a function of the molar ratios of the isomers when the synthetic standards of the isomers are available, however, not resolved by separations (Fig. 3a). The molar fraction of the isomers from an unknown can thus be extracted from the calibration curve (Fig. 3b). When the total quantity of the isomer is known, the concentration information can be further obtained. Examples of isomer quantitation following this principle have been shown for both C=C location isomers and sn-isomers (58, 65). When the standards are not available, only “relative fractional quantitation” can be obtained because how the structural differences of the isomers might affect ionization and fragmentation is unknown. In this case, the abundance ratios or fractions of the diagnostic ions are directly used for relative fractional quantitation. Relative fractional quantitation is very useful as a readout for monitoring dysregulated lipid metabolism in various applications as discussed in the latter section. Isomer quantitation has also been performed using a certain pattern of the fragment ions when diagnostic ions are not formed, in which more complex calibrations are involved (26, 47, 113). Fig. 3. Schematics for isomer quantitation by isomer-resolving MS/MS: (a) forming diagnostic fragment ions for each isomer (A and B) by MS/MS and (b) constructing a calibration curve and obtaining molar fraction of each isomer if the synthetic standards are available for different biological samples (S1 and S2). If synthetic standards are not available, “relative fractional quantitation” is achieved from measuring the abundance ratios of the diagnostic ions (I /I ). A B Applications of detailed lipid structural analysis Journal Pre-proof In recently years the isomer-resolving MS/MS methods are increasingly applied for identification and quantitation of complex lipids at the levels of C=C location and sn-position as summarized in Table 1. These types of detailed information provide direct experimental evidence to studying the metabolism of lipid isomers. Young et al. used OzID-MS/MS to investigate substrate promiscuity of the human fatty acid desaturase FADS2 (114). In combination with gene silencing and stable isotope tracing, FADS2 was found to promote the production of n-8, n-10, and n-12 lipid species that have rarely been reported previously in human cell lines (Fig. 4a). The distribution of lipid isomers in tumor microenvironment was further revealed by MALDI-OzID-MS/MS imaging, suggesting distinct enzyme-substrate interactions in tumor regions. In another report, Li et al. studied the response of cellular lipidome under SCD1 inhibition at the single-cell level (67). The relative amounts of lipid C=C location isomers in MDA-Mb-468 cell lines were found to change significantly after SCD1 inhibition by CAY10566 (Fig. 4b). The abundances of PCs containing the n-7 isomers of C16:1 and C18:1 decreased significantly upon inhibition while the abundances of PCs containing C18:2 (n-6, n-9) and the n-10 isomers of C16:1 and C18:1 increased (Fig. 4c). This may be resulted from an enhanced FADS2 activity due to the inhibition of SCD1. Fig. 4. a) Heatmap of the C=C location isomers of GPLs in treated LNCaP cells relative to untreated cells (114), showing that SCD-1-related lipids (the n-7 and n-9 isomers) and FADS2-related lipids (the n-10 isomers) have inversed abundance shifts due to silencing of SCD1 and FADS2, respectively. (Reprinted with permission (114). Copyright 2021 Elsevier). b) Alterations in the relative amounts of the C=C location isomers of PC 34:2 in MDA-MB-468 single cells upon SCD1 inhibition (67) and c) significant decrease of the C16:1(n-7) and C18:1(n-7) isomers of PC 34:2. (Reprinted with permission (67). Copyright 2021 Springer Nature). d) Synthetic pathways of different C=C location isomers of monounsaturated FAs in human cells (modified from (114)). Mammalian C18:1 typically consists of n-9 (or Δ9) and n-7 (or Δ11) as the two major C=C location isomers resulting from distinct biosynthetic pathways (Fig. 4d). The relative abundance of the isomers can Journal Pre-proof be affected due to a dysregulated lipid metabolism caused by the unset or progression of disease. For instance, the relative compositions of the n-9 and n-7 isomers of C18:1 in a variety of PCs and PEs were found to change significantly between plasma samples of normal control and type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients and tissue samples from breast cancer patients using an LC-PB-MS/MS method (59). In combination with methylation and charge-tagging, PB-MS/MS also enabled sensitive screening of potential plasma lipid C=C isomer biomarkers of T2D in other classes of lipids such as anionic GPLs (61), FAs (65), DGs, and TGs (115). By discrimination of both C=C and sn-isomers of GPLs, it showed further advantage in phenotyping different disease states and discovery of differentiating lipids (66). For example, no statistically significant change was obtained by using either relative abundance of C=C location isomers or sn-position isomers of certain GPLs for the discrimination of non-small cell lung cancer tissues from adjacent normal tissues. However, using information from both C=C and sn-isomers from a series of GPLs, all the tissues were correctly classified by hierarchical cluster analysis. Paine et al. applied MALDI-OzID-MSI for the analysis of medulloblastoma tumor in mouse brain tissue samples (33, 116). Altered isomeric populations in the tumor were observed relative to the surrounding white and gray matter, such as the sn-isomers of PC 16:0_18:1, PC 18:0/18:1, and PC 16:0_20:1, and the n-7 C=C location isomers in PC 34:1 and PC 36:1. Marshall et al. incorporated OzID into data-independent shotgun lipidomics workflow for two-dimensional characterization of lipid isomers in human plasma (29). It revealed that most unsaturated lipids were present as isomeric mixtures, some of which showed common origins in lipid biosynthesis, indicating that human plasma lipidome may be a valuable resource to unresolved new lipid isomers biomarkers. In a recent report, significant alterations in n-10/n-9 ratios of lipids in human prostate tissues were demonstrated, including PS 34:1, PS 36:1, PE 36:1, and PC 34:1 (114). Klein et al. coupled DESI with UVPD for imaging C=C location isomers in tissue samples (40). For human lymph node tissue containing thyroid cancer metastasis, the intensity ratios of PC 16:0_18:1(n-9) to PC 16:0_18:1(n-7) showed different distributions between normal and cancerous portions of the tissue. DESI-UVPD-MSI allowed the discrimination of breast cancer subtypes of different hormone receptor status based on the relative abundances of the n-9 and n-7 isomers of FA 18:1 (117). Journal Pre-proof DESI-MSI via a prior mCPBA epoxidation revealed significant increase of PG 16:0_18:1(n-7) isomer in the tumor cell regions (77). Using peracetic acid for epoxidation, an MALDI-MSI approach was recently reported, which showed high sensitivity for imaging the C=C location isomers of FAs in murine melanoma tumor (63). Conclusions and Outlook We have seen a rapid expansion of MS/MS methods capable of resolving lipid isomers at various structural levels over the past few years. These developments lead to the discovery of novel lipid molecules, show the possibility to untangle lipid metabolism involving isomers, and offer a new direction for biomarker discovery. While promising, many of the techniques are in the early stage of development; further technical advancement is needed for them to evolve as the tool of choice for lipid profiling in the future. For instance, most methods work better in positive ion mode regarding formation of the diagnostic fragment ions, which thus have limited sensitivity for anionic lipids (e.g., PA and PI) and nonpolar lipids (e.g., FA, GL, and CE). Some successes have been achieved by enhancing ionization of these lipid classes in positive ion mode via phosphate methylation or charge-tagging. Nevertheless, isomer-resolving MS/MS methods which are independent of the charge polarity of lipids need to be explored. It is also desirable to integrate isomer- resolving MS/MS methods with different lipidomic analysis workflows, especially LC-MS, one of the major platforms for lipid analysis. This requires innovations in instrumentation to shorten the ion activation time of MS/MS to tens of ms while still produce abundant diagnostic fragment ions so that they can be compatible with LC separations. With new developments in methodologies and instrumentation, IMS has gained increasing attention in MS applicaitons during past few years (118). IMS provides a dimension of separation according to the collision cross sections of lipid ions in tens of milliseconds timescale (119), which is readily compatible with shotgun analysis, LC separations, MS imaging, and isomer-resolving MS/MS on several commercial mass spectrometers. While there are solutions for locating C=C or sn- position in lipids as emphasized in this review, new MS methods, likely through an integration with gas- Journal Pre-proof phase spectroscopy, such as cryo-infrared spectroscopy (120), are needed to solve more challenging structural problems, including stereo-configuration of the C=C and the identity of the glycans. There is always a trade-off between sensitivity and the level of structural information one can get. For the MS methods discussed herein, they typically offer a limit of identification in the range of nM to sub-μM, one to two orders of magnitude higher than the measurements without differentiating lipid isomers. To push detailed structural analysis to the lipids of lower abundances, such as lipid mediators or single cell lipidome, an integration with pre-enrichment methods will help in this regard. With the new capabilities of deep-lipidotyping, of equal importance is development of tools for data analysis and automated lipid annotation at deeper structural levels (121). This development is critical to speeding up the transfer of new MS methods from expert labs to ordinary lipid analysis labs. Due to the shortage of the lipid standards, it remains challenging for quantitation of complex lipids in biological samples. Relative quantitation of lipid isomers thus provides a simple and effective means to study the change of lipids from different biological states. Several examples have shown that relative quantitation of C=C location isomers or sn-position isomers is more sensitive in the discovery of differentiating lipids which might be potential biomarkers. It is expected that more lipidomics labs will be interested in using deep-lipidotyping as a new means to investigate lipid functions and metabolism. Author Contributions W. Z. and Y. X. wrote the manuscript. R. J., J. Z., and Y. L. prepared the figures. All authors critically reviewed the article. References 1. Han, X., and R. W. Gross. (2003). Global analyses of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples by ESI mass spectrometry: a bridge to lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 44: 1071- 2. Wenk, M. R. (2005). The emerging field of lipidomics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 4: 594-610. 3. Wenk, M. R. (2010). Lipidomics: New Tools and Applications. Cell 143: 888-895. 4. Lam, S. M., C. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Ni, S. Zhang, S. Yang, X. Huang, L. Mo, J. Li, B. Lee, M. Mei, L. Huang, M. Shi, Z. Xu, F. P. Meng, W. J. Cao, M. J. Zhou, L. Shi, G. H. Chua, B. Li, J. Cao, J. Journal Pre-proof Wang, S. Bao, Y. Wang, J. W. Song, F. Zhang, F. S. Wang, and G. Shui. (2021). A multi-omics investigation of the composition and function of extracellular vesicles along the temporal trajectory of COVID-19. Nat. Metab. 3: 909-922. 5. Lipidomics Standards Initiative, C. (2019). Lipidomics needs more standardization. Nat. Metab. 1: 745-747. 6. Currie, E., A. Schulze, R. Zechner, T. C. Walther, and R. Farese Jr. (2013). Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab. 18: 153-161. 7. Quehenberger, O., A. M. Armando, and E. A. Dennis. (2011). High sensitivity quantitative lipidomics analysis of fatty acids in biological samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1811: 648-656. 8. Schwudke, D., J. T. Hannich, V. Surendranath, V. Grimard, T. Moehring, L. Burton, T. Kurzchalia, and A. Shevchenko. (2007). Top-Down Lipidomic Screens by Multivariate Analysis of High- Resolution Survey Mass Spectra. Anal. Chem. 79: 4083-4093. 9. Züllig, T., M. Trötzmüller, and H. C. Köfeler. (2020). Lipidomics from sample preparation to data analysis: a primer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 412: 2191-2209. 10. Voinov, V. G., S. E. Bennett, J. S. Beckman, and D. F. Barofsky. (2014). ECD of tyrosine phosphorylation in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with a radio-frequency-free electromagnetostatic cell. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25: 1730-1738. 11. Chi, A., C. Huttenhower, L. Y. Geer, J. J. Coon, J. E. Syka, D. L. Bai, J. Shabanowitz, D. J. Burke, O. G. Troyanskaya, and D. F. Hunt. (2007). Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 2193-2198. 12. Wolff, J. J., T. N. Laremore, H. Aslam, R. J. Linhardt, and I. J. Amster. (2008). Electron-induced dissociation of glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19: 1449-1458. 13. Porta Siegel, T., K. Ekroos, and S. R. Ellis. (2019). Reshaping Lipid Biochemistry by Pushing Barriers in Structural Lipidomics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58: 6492-6501. 14. Liebisch, G., E. Fahy, J. Aoki, E. A. Dennis, T. Durand, C. S. Ejsing, M. Fedorova, I. Feussner, W. J. Griffiths, H. Kofeler, A. H. Merrill, Jr., R. C. Murphy, V. B. O'Donnell, O. Oskolkova, S. Subramaniam, M. J. O. Wakelam, and F. Spener. (2020). Update on LIPID MAPS classification, nomenclature, and shorthand notation for MS-derived lipid structures. J. Lipid. Res. 61: 1539-1555. 15. Han, X. (2016). Lipidomics for studying metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 12: 668-679. 16. Yang, K., and X. Han. (2016). Lipidomics: techniques, applications, and outcomes related to biomedical sciences. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41: 954-969. 17. Murphy, R. C. 2014. Tandem mass spectrometry of lipids: molecular analysis of complex lipids. Royal Society of Chemistry. 18. Han, X. 2016. Lipidomics: comprehensive mass spectrometry of lipids. John Wiley & Sons. 19. Lorent, J. H., K. R. Levental, L. Ganesan, G. Rivera-Longsworth, E. Sezgin, M. Doktorova, E. Lyman, and I. Levental. (2020). Plasma membranes are asymmetric in lipid unsaturation, packing and protein shape. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16: 644-652. 20. Subbaiah, P. V., D. Sircar, B. Aizezi, and E. Mintzer. (2010). Differential effects of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on the biophysical and biochemical properties of model membranes. BBA- Biomembranes 1798: 506-514. 21. Martinez-Seara, H., T. Róg, M. Pasenkiewicz-Gierula, I. Vattulainen, M. Karttunen, and R. Reigada. (2008). Interplay of unsaturated phospholipids and cholesterol in membranes: effect of the double-bond position. Biophys. J. 95: 3295-3305. 22. Vriens, K., S. Christen, S. Parik, D. Broekaert, K. Yoshinaga, A. Talebi, J. Dehairs, C. Escalona- Noguero, R. Schmieder, T. Cornfield, C. Charlton, L. Romero-Pérez, M. Rossi, G. Rinaldi, M. F. Orth, R. Boon, A. Kerstens, S. Y. Kwan, B. Faubert, A. Méndez-Lucas, C. C. Kopitz, T. Chen, J. Fernandez- Garcia, J. A. G. Duarte, A. A. Schmitz, P. Steigemann, M. Najimi, A. Hägebarth, J. A. Van Ginderachter, E. Sokal, N. Gotoh, K.-K. Wong, C. Verfaillie, R. Derua, S. Munck, M. Yuneva, L. Beretta, R. J. DeBerardinis, J. V. Swinnen, L. Hodson, D. Cassiman, C. Verslype, S. Christian, S. Grünewald, T. G. P. Journal Pre-proof Grünewald, and S.-M. Fendt. (2019). Evidence for an alternative fatty acid desaturation pathway increasing cancer plasticity. Nature 566: 403-406. 23. Lawrence, P., and J. T. Brenna. (2006). Acetonitrile covalent adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry for double bond localization in non-methylene-interrupted polyene fatty acid methyl esters. Anal. Chem. 78: 1312-1317. 24. Wang, D. H., Z. Wang, J. R. Cortright, K. P. Le, L. Liu, K. S. D. Kothapalli, and J. T. Brenna. (2020). Identification of polymethylene-interrupted polyunsaturated fatty acids (PMI-PUFA) by solvent- mediated covalent adduct chemical ionization triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 92: 8209-8217. 25. Griffiths, W. J. (2003). Tandem mass spectrometry in the study of fatty acids, bile acids, and steroids. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 22: 81-152. 26. Wang, M., R. H. Han, and X. Han. (2013). Fatty acidomics: global analysis of lipid species containing a carboxyl group with a charge-remote fragmentation-assisted approach. Anal. Chem. 85: 9312-9320. 27. Thomas, M. C., T. W. Mitchell, D. G. Harman, J. M. Deeley, J. R. Nealon, and S. J. Blanksby. (2008). Ozone-induced dissociation: elucidation of double bond position within mass-selected lipid ions. Anal. Chem. 80: 303-311. 28. Brown, S. H., T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2011). Analysis of unsaturated lipids by ozone-induced dissociation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1811: 807-817. 29. Marshall, D. L., A. Criscuolo, R. S. E. Young, B. L. J. Poad, M. Zeller, G. E. Reid, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2019). Mapping unsaturation in human plasma lipids by data-independent ozone-induced dissociation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 30: 1621-1630. 30. Poad, B. L., H. T. Pham, M. C. Thomas, J. R. Nealon, J. L. Campbell, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2010). Ozone-induced dissociation on a modified tandem linear ion-trap: observations of different reactivity for isomeric lipids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21: 1989-1999. 31. Poad, B. L. J., M. R. Green, J. M. Kirk, N. Tomczyk, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2017). High-pressure ozone-induced dissociation for lipid structure elucidation on fast chromatographic timescales. Anal. Chem. 89: 4223-4229. 32. Poad, B. L. J., X. Zheng, T. W. Mitchell, R. D. Smith, E. S. Baker, and S. J. Blanksby. (2018). Online ozonolysis combined with ion mobility-mass spectrometry provides a new platform for lipid isomer analyses. Anal. Chem. 90: 1292-1300. 33. Claes, B. S. R., A. P. Bowman, B. L. J. Poad, R. S. E. Young, R. M. A. Heeren, S. J. Blanksby, and S. R. Ellis. (2021). Mass spectrometry imaging of lipids with isomer resolution using high-pressure ozone-induced dissociation. Anal. Chem. 93: 9826-9834. 34. Williams, P. E., D. R. Klein, S. M. Greer, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2017). Pinpointing double bond and sn-positions in glycerophospholipids via hybrid 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139: 15681-15690. 35. Ryan, E., C. Q. N. Nguyen, C. Shiea, and G. E. Reid. (2017). Detailed structural characterization of sphingolipids via 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation and ultra high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28: 1406-1419. 36. Buenger, E. W., and G. E. Reid. (2020). Shedding light on isomeric FAHFA lipid structures using 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry. Eur. J. Mass. Spectrom. 26: 311-323. 37. Klein, D. R., M. S. Blevins, L. A. Macias, M. V. Douglass, M. S. Trent, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2020). Localization of double bonds in bacterial glycerophospholipids using 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation in the negative Mode. Anal. Chem. 92: 5986-5993. 38. Macias, L. A., C. L. Feider, L. S. Eberlin, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2019). Hybrid 193 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry Localizes Cardiolipin Unsaturations. Anal. Chem. 91: 12509- 39. Macias, L. A., K. Y. Garza, C. L. Feider, L. S. Eberlin, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2021). Relative quantitation of unsaturated phosphatidylcholines using 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143: 14622-14634. Journal Pre-proof 40. Klein, D. R., C. L. Feider, K. Y. Garza, J. Q. Lin, L. S. Eberlin, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2018). Desorption electrospray ionization coupled with ultraviolet photodissociation for characterization of phospholipid isomers in tissue sections. Anal. Chem. 90: 10100-10104. 41. Cody, R. B. B. S. F. (1979). Electron impact excitation of ions from organics: an alternative to collision induced dissociation. Anal. Chem. 51: 547-551. 42. Campbell, J. L., and T. Baba. (2015). Near-complete structural characterization of phosphatidylcholines using electron impact excitation of ions from organics. Anal. Chem. 87: 5837-5845. 43. Jones, J. W., C. J. Thompson, C. L. Carter, and M. A. Kane. (2015). Electron-induced dissociation (EID) for structure characterization of glycerophosphatidylcholine: determination of double- bond positions and localization of acyl chains. J. Mass Spectrom. 50: 1327-1339. 44. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, and P. R. S. Baker. (2016). In-depth sphingomyelin characterization using electron impact excitation of ions from organics and mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 57: 858-867. 45. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, and P. R. S. Baker. (2016). Structural identification of triacylglycerol isomers using electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO). J. Lipid Res. 57: 2015-2027. 46. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, and P. R. S. Baker. (2017). Distinguishing Cis and Trans Isomers in Intact Complex Lipids Using Electron Impact Excitation of Ions from Organics Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89: 7307-7315. 47. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, P. R. S. Baker, and K. Ikeda. (2018). Quantitative structural multiclass lipidomics using differential mobility: electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO) mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 59: 910-919. 48. Pham, H. T., T. Ly, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2012). Differentiation of complex lipid isomers by radical-directed dissociation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 84: 7525-7532. 49. Narreddula, V. R., B. I. McKinnon, S. J. P. Marlton, D. L. Marshall, N. R. B. Boase, B. L. J. Poad, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2021). Next-generation derivatization reagents optimized for enhanced product ion formation in photodissociation-mass spectrometry of fatty acids. Analyst 146: 156-169. 50. Narreddula, V. R., N. R. Boase, R. Ailuri, D. L. Marshall, B. L. J. Poad, M. J. Kelso, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2019). Introduction of a Fixed-Charge, Photolabile Derivative for Enhanced Structural Elucidation of Fatty Acids. Anal. Chem. 91: 9901-9909. 51. Tomer, K. B., F. W. Crow, and M. L. J. J. o. t. A. C. S. Gross. (1983). Location of double-bond position in unsaturated fatty acids by negative ion MS/MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105: 5487-5488. 52. Hsu, F. F., and J. Turk. (1999). Distinction among isomeric unsaturated fatty acids as lithiated adducts by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using low energy collisionally activated dissociation on a triple stage quadrupole instrument. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 10: 600-612. 53. Randolph, C. E., D. J. Foreman, S. K. Betancourt, S. J. Blanksby, and S. A. McLuckey. (2018). Gas-phase ion/ion reactions involving tris-phenanthroline alkaline earth metal complexes as charge inversion reagents for the identification of fatty acids. Anal. Chem. 90: 12861-12869. 54. Randolph, C. E., S. J. Blanksby, and S. A. McLuckey. (2020). Toward complete structure elucidation of glycerophospholipids in the gas phase through charge inversion ion/ion chemistry. Anal. Chem. 92: 1219-1227. 55. Li, P., W. D. Hoffmann, and G. P. Jackson. (2016). Multistage mass spectrometry of phospholipids using collision-induced dissociation (CID) and metastable atom-activated dissociation (MAD). Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 403: 1-7. 56. Takahashi, H., Y. Shimabukuro, D. Asakawa, S. Yamauchi, S. Sekiya, S. Iwamoto, M. Wada, and K. Tanaka. (2018). Structural analysis of phospholipid using hydrogen abstraction dissociation and oxygen attachment dissociation in tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90: 7230-7238. 57. Ma, X., and Y. Xia. (2014). Pinpointing Double Bonds in Lipids by Paternò-Büchi Reactions and Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53: 2592-2596. Journal Pre-proof 58. Ma, X., L. Chong, R. Tian, R. Shi, T. Y. Hu, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2016). Identification and quantitation of lipid C=C location isomers: a shotgun lipidomics approach enabled by photochemical reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113: 2573-2578. 59. Zhang, W., D. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Wu, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2019). Online photochemical derivatization enables comprehensive mass spectrometric analysis of unsaturated phospholipid isomers. Nat. Commun. 10: 79. 60. Zhang, W., B. Shang, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2020). Enhanced Phospholipid isomer analysis by online photochemical derivatization and RPLC-MS. Anal. Chem. 92: 6719-6726. 61. Xia, T., H. Ren, W. Zhang, and Y. Xia. (2020). Lipidome-wide characterization of phosphatidylinositols and phosphatidylglycerols on C=C location level. Anal. Chim. Acta 1128: 107-115. 62. Zhu, Y., W. Wang, and Z. Yang. (2020). Combining Mass Spectrometry with Paternò–Büchi Reaction to Determine Double-Bond Positions in Lipids at the Single-Cell Level. Anal. Chem. 92: 11380- 63. Ma, X., W. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Xia, and Z. Ouyang. (2021). Enabling high structural specificity to lipidomics by coupling photochemical derivatization with tandem mass spectrometry. Acc. Chem. Res. 54: 3873-3882. 64. Esch, P., and S. Heiles. (2018). Charging and charge switching of unsaturated lipids and apolar compounds using Paternò-Büchi reactions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 29: 1971-1980. 65. Zhao, J., M. Fang, and Y. Xia. (2021). A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry workflow for in-depth quantitation of fatty acid double bond location isomers. J. Lipid. Res. 62: 100110. 66. Cao, W., S. Cheng, J. Yang, J. Feng, W. Zhang, Z. Li, Q. Chen, Y. Xia, Z. Ouyang, and X. Ma. (2020). Large-scale lipid analysis with C=C location and sn-position isomer resolving power. Nat. Commun. 11: 375. 67. Li, Z., S. Cheng, Q. Lin, W. Cao, J. Yang, M. Zhang, A. Shen, W. Zhang, Y. Xia, X. Ma, and Z. Ouyang. (2021). Single-cell lipidomics with high structural specificity by mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 12: 2869. 68. Su, Y., X. Ma, J. Page, R. Shi, Y. Xia, and Z. Ouyang. (2019). Mapping lipid C=C location isomers in organ tissues by coupling photochemical derivatization and rapid extractive mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 445. 69. Tang, F., C. Guo, X. Ma, J. Zhang, Y. Su, R. Tian, R. Shi, Y. Xia, X. Wang, and Z. Ouyang. (2018). Rapid in situ profiling of lipid C=C location isomers in tissue using ambient mass spectrometry with photochemical reactions. Anal. Chem. 90: 5612-5619. 70. Bednarik, A., S. Bolsker, J. Soltwisch, and K. Dreisewerd. (2018). An on-tissue Paterno-Buchi reaction for localization of carbon-carbon double bonds in phospholipids and glycolipids by matrix- assisted laser-desorption-ionization mass-spectrometry imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57: 12092-12096. 71. Wäldchen, F., F. Mohr, A. H. Wagner, and S. Heiles. (2020). Multifunctional Reactive MALDI Matrix Enabling High-Lateral Resolution Dual Polarity MS Imaging and Lipid C═C Position-Resolved MS2 Imaging. Anal. Chem. 92: 14130-14138. 72. Zhao, Y., H. Zhao, X. Zhao, J. Jia, Q. Ma, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Chiba, S.-P. Hui, and X. Ma. (2017). Identification and Quantitation of C═C Location Isomers of Unsaturated Fatty Acids by Epoxidation Reaction and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89: 10270-10278. 73. Cao, W., X. Ma, Z. Li, X. Zhou, and Z. Ouyang. (2018). Locating carbon–carbon double bonds in unsaturated phospholipids by epoxidation reaction and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90: 10286-10292. 74. Tang, S., H. Cheng, and X. Yan. (2020). On‐demand electrochemical epoxidation in nano‐ electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to locate carbon–carbon double bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59: 209-214. 75. Chintalapudi, K., and A. K. Badu-Tawiah. (2020). An integrated electrocatalytic nESI-MS platform for quantification of fatty acid isomers directly from untreated biofluids. Chem. Sci. 11: 9891- Journal Pre-proof 76. Feng, Y., B. Chen, Q. Yu, and L. Li. (2019). Identification of double bond position isomers in unsaturated lipids by m-CPBA epoxidation and mass spectrometry fragmentation. Anal. Chem. 91: 1791- 77. Kuo, T. H., H. H. Chung, H. Y. Chang, C. W. Lin, M. Y. Wang, T. L. Shen, and C. C. Hsu. (2019). Deep lipidomics and molecular imaging of unsaturated lipid isomers: a universal strategy initiated by mCPBA epoxidation. Anal. Chem. 91: 11905-11915. 78. Song, C., D. Gao, S. Li, L. Liu, X. Chen, and Y. Jiang. (2019). Determination and quantification of fatty acid C=C isomers by epoxidation reaction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1086: 82-89. 79. Bouza, M., Y. Li, C. Wu, H. Guo, Z. L. Wang, and F. M. Fernández. (2020). Large-Area Triboelectric Nanogenerator Mass Spectrometry: Expanded Coverage, Double-Bond Pinpointing, and Supercharging. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 31: 727-734. 80. Swiner, D. J., D. S. Kulyk, H. Osae, G. R. Durisek Iii, and A. K. Badu-Tawiah. (2022). Reactive Thread Spray Mass Spectrometry for Localization of C═C Bonds in Free Fatty Acids: Applications for Obesity Diagnosis. Anal. Chem. 94: 2358-2365. 81. Zhou, Y., H. Park, P. Kim, Y. Jiang, and C. E. Costello. (2014). Surface oxidation under ambient air-not only a fast and economical method to identify double bond positions in unsaturated lipids but also a reminder of proper lipid processing. Anal. Chem. 86: 5697-5705. 82. Girotti, A. W. (1985). Mechanisms of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1: 87-95. 83. Unsihuay, D., P. Su, H. Hu, J. Qiu, S. Kuang, Y. Li, X. Sun, S. K. Dey, and J. Laskin. (2021). Imaging and analysis of isomeric unsaturated lipids through online photochemical derivatization of carbon-carbon double bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60: 7559-7563. 84. Shindou, H., and T. Shimizu. (2009). Acyl-CoA: lysophospholipid acyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 1-5. 85. Shindou, H., D. Hishikawa, T. Harayama, K. Yuki, and T. Shimizu. (2009). Recent progress on acyl CoA: lysophospholipid acyltransferase research. J. Lipid Res. 50: S46-S51. 86. Dennis, E. A., J. Cao, Y. H. Hsu, V. Magrioti, and G. Kokotos. (2011). Phospholipase A2 enzymes: physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention. Chem. Rev. 111: 6130-6185. 87. Inoue, A., and J. Aoki. (2006). Phospholipase A1: structure, distribution and function. Future Lipidol. 1: 687-700. 88. Ekroos, K., C. S. Ejsing, U. Bahr, M. Karas, K. Simons, and A. Shevchenko. (2003). Charting molecular composition of phosphatidylcholines by fatty acid scanning and ion trap MS3 fragmentation. J. Lipid Res. 44: 2181-2192. 89. Vogeser, M., and G. Schelling. (2007). Pitfalls in measuring the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol in biological samples. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 45: 1023-1025. 90. Wang, M., J. Hayakawa, K. Yang, and X. Han. (2014). Characterization and quantification of diacylglycerol species in biological extracts after one-step derivatization: a shotgun lipidomics approach. Anal. Chem. 86: 2146-2155. 91. Yang, K., B. G. Dilthey, and R. W. Gross. (2016). Shotgun lipidomics approach to stabilize the regiospecificity of monoglycerides using a facile low-temperature derivatization enabling their definitive identification and quantitation. Anal. Chem. 88: 9459-9468. 92. Murphy, R., T. Leiker, and M. Robert. (2011). Glycerolipid and cholesterol ester analyses in biological samples by mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1811: 776-783. 93. Herrera, L. C., M. A. Potvin, and J. E. Melanson. (2010). Quantitative analysis of positional isomers of triacylglycerols via electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry of sodiated adducts. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 24: 2745-2752. 94. Hsu, F. F., and J. Turk. (2010). Electrospray ionization multiple-stage linear ion-trap mass spectrometry for structural elucidation of triacylglycerols: assignment of fatty acyl groups on the glycerol backbone and location of double bonds. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21: 657-669. Journal Pre-proof 95. Hsu, F. F., and J. Turk. (2003). Electrospray ionization/tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric studies on phosphatidylcholines: The fragmentation processes. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 14: 352-363. 96. Pham, H. T., A. T. Maccarone, M. C. Thomas, J. L. Campbell, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2014). Structural characterization of glycerophospholipids by combinations of ozone- and collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry: the next step towards “top-down” lipidomics. Analyst 139: 204-214. 97. Kirschbaum, C., K. Greis, L. Polewski, S. Gewinner, W. Schollkopf, G. Meijer, G. von Helden, and K. Pagel. (2021). Unveiling glycerolipid fragmentation by cryogenic infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143: 14827-14834. 98. Kozlowski, R. L., T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2015). A rapid ambient ionization-mass spectrometry approach to monitoring the relative abundance of isomeric glycerophospholipids. Sci. Rep. 5: 9243. 99. Marshall, D. L., H. T. Pham, M. Bhujel, J. S. Chin, J. Y. Yew, K. Mori, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2016). Sequential collision-and ozone-induced dissociation enables assignment of relative acyl chain position in triacylglycerols. Anal. Chem. 88: 2685-2692. 100. Zhao, X., W. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Cao, Q. Chen, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2019). A lipidomic workflow capable of resolving sn- and C=C location isomers of phosphatidylcholines. Chem. Sci. 10: 10740-10748. 101. Zhao, X., and Y. Xia. (2021). Characterization of fatty acyl modifications in phosphatidylcholines and lysophosphatidylcholines via radical-directed dissociation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 32: 560-568. 102. Becher, S., P. Esch, and S. Heiles. (2018). Relative Quantification of Phosphatidylcholine sn- Isomers Using Positive Doubly Charged Lipid–Metal Ion Complexes. Anal. Chem. 90: 11486-11494. 103. Taormina, V. M., A. L. Unger, M. R. Schiksnis, M. Torres-Gonzalez, and J. Kraft. (2020). Branched-chain fatty acids—An underexplored class of dairy-derived fatty acids. Nutrients 12: 2875. 104. Ran-Ressler, R. R., P. Lawrence, and J. T. Brenna. (2012). Structural characterization of saturated branched chain fatty acid methyl esters by collisional dissociation of molecular ions generated by electron ionization. J. Lipid Res. 53: 195-203. 105. Wang, Z., D. H. Wang, H. G. Park, H. J. Tobias, K. S. D. Kothapalli, and J. T. Brenna. (2019). Structural identification of monounsaturated branched chain fatty acid methyl esters by combination of electron ionization and covalent adduct chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91: 15147-15154. 106. Wang, D. H., Z. Wang, and J. T. Brenna. (2020). Gas Chromatography Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Identification and Straightforward Quantification of Branched Chain Fatty Acids in Foods. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 68: 4973-4980. 107. Wang, Z., H. G. Park, D. H. Wang, R. Kitano, K. S. Kothapalli, and J. T. Brenna. (2020). Fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) but not FADS1 desaturates branched chain and odd chain saturated fatty acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1865: 158572. 108. Poger, D., and A. E. Mark. (2015). A ring to rule them all: the effect of cyclopropane fatty acids on the fluidity of lipid bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 119: 5487-5495. 109. Zetzsche, L. E., and A. R. Narayan. (2020). Broadening the scope of biocatalytic C–C bond formation. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4: 334-346. 110. Blevins, M. S., D. R. Klein, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2019). Localization of cyclopropane modifications in bacterial lipids via 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91: 6820-6828. 111. Narreddula, V. R., P. Sadowski, N. R. B. Boase, D. L. Marshall, B. L. J. Poad, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2020). Structural elucidation of hydroxy fatty acids by photodissociation mass spectrometry with photolabile derivatives. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 34: e8741. 112. Zhao, X., G. Wu, W. Zhang, M. Dong, and Y. Xia. (2020). Resolving Modifications on Sphingoid Base and N-Acyl Chain of Sphingomyelin Lipids in Complex Lipid Extracts. Anal. Chem. 92: 14775-14782. Journal Pre-proof 113. Randolph, C. E., D. J. Foreman, S. J. Blanksby, and S. A. McLuckey. (2019). Generating fatty acid profiles in the gas phase: fatty acid identification and relative quantitation using ion/ion charge inversion chemistry. Anal. Chem. 91: 9032-9040. 114. Young, R. S. E., A. P. Bowman, E. D. Williams, K. D. Tousignant, C. L. Bidgood, V. R. Narreddula, R. Gupta, D. L. Marshall, B. L. J. Poad, C. C. Nelson, S. R. Ellis, R. M. A. Heeren, M. C. Sadowski, and S. J. Blanksby. (2021). Apocryphal FADS2 activity promotes fatty acid diversification in cancer. Cell Rep. 34: 108738. 115. Xia, T., M. Yuan, Y. Xu, F. Zhou, K. Yu, and Y. Xia. (2021). Deep Structural Annotation of Glycerolipids by the Charge-Tagging Paterno–Büchi Reaction and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography– Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 93: 8345-8353. 116. Paine, M. R. L., B. L. J. Poad, G. B. Eijkel, D. L. Marshall, S. J. Blanksby, R. M. A. Heeren, and S. R. Ellis. (2018). Mass spectrometry imaging with isomeric resolution enabled by ozone-induced dissociation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57: 10530-10534. 117. Feider, C. L., L. A. Macias, J. S. Brodbelt, and L. S. Eberlin. (2020). Double Bond Characterization of Free Fatty Acids Directly from Biological Tissues by Ultraviolet Photodissociation. Anal. Chem. 92: 8386-8395. 118. Wu, Q., J.-Y. Wang, D.-Q. Han, and Z.-P. Yao. (2020). Recent advances in differentiation of isomers by ion mobility mass spectrometry. TRAC Trends Anal. Chem. 124: 115801. 119. Hinz, C., S. Liggi, and J. L. Griffin. (2018). The potential of Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry for high-throughput and high-resolution lipidomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 42: 42-50. 120. Kirschbaum, C., E. M. Saied, K. Greis, E. Mucha, S. Gewinner, W. Schöllkopf, G. Meijer, G. von Helden, B. L. J. Poad, S. J. Blanksby, C. Arenz, and K. Pagel. (2020). Resolving Sphingolipid Isomers Using Cryogenic Infrared Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59: 13638-13642. 121. Korf, A., V. Jeck, R. Schmid, P. O. Helmer, and H. Hayen. (2019). Lipid Species Annotation at Double Bond Position Level with Custom Databases by Extension of the MZmine 2 Open-Source Software Package. Anal. Chem. 91: 5098-5105. 122. Wäldchen, F., B. Spengler, and S. Heiles. (2019). Reactive matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging using an intrinsically photoreactive Paterno–Buchi matrix for double-bond localization in isomeric phospholipids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141: 11816-11820. 123. West, H., and G. E. Reid. (2021). Hybrid 213 nm photodissociation of cationized Sterol lipid ions yield [M]+. Radical products for improved structural characterization using multistage tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1141: 100-109. Journal Pre-proof Figure Captions Fig. 1. Structural hierarchy of a complex lipid, represented by a phosphatidylethanolamine molecule: PE 16:1(9Z)/20:4(5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z). The “Δ” and “n-” annotations for the locations of C=C are indicated in the structure. The MS/MS methods that have been developed for characterizing at each structural level. *The identified structural levels are named according to Liebisch et al. (14) Fig. 2 The two approaches for locating the C=Cs in lipids by MS. The gas-phase ion activation methods, including OzID, UVPD, CRF, EIEIO, RDD, MAD, etc., initiate fragmentations at or around a C=C. Alternatively, the C=C can be firstly transformed into functional groups that are prone to generating informative fragments in subsequent CID. The transformations can be achieved via the PB reaction, epoxidation, and ΔO -ene reaction. Scheme 1. Gas-phase ion dissociation methods for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) OzID, (b) UVPD, and (c) EIEIO. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. Scheme 2. Double bond specific derivatization methods coupled with subsequent MS/MS for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) the PB reaction, (b) epoxidation, and (c) ΔO -ene reaction. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. Scheme 3. The MS/MS methods capable of analyzing GPLs and TAGs at the sn-position level. (a) 2 + Formation of a dioxolane-type fragment ion from MS CID of [M + Na] of GPLs. Loss of the sn-2 C𝛼 -H 2/3 is the exclusive pathway involved in the phospho-headgroup loss (-HOE) from MS CID of protonated or metal adduct of GPLs. The dioxolane-type fragment ion contains a C=C newly formed between the first two carbons of the sn-2 acyl chain. For TAGs, the C𝛼 -H can be lost from any of the three sn-positions and thus four structures of dioxolane-type fragment ions are formed if the three chains have different masses. 3 3 3 (b) MS CID-OzID, (c) MS CID-UVPD, and (d) 2-acpy PB coupled with MS CID for analysis of sn- isomer of GLPs. Journal Pre-proof Scheme 4. (a) Formation of the sn-specific fragment ions from EIEIO of TAG ([M +Na] ). The doublet with 2 Da mass difference is a signature for sn-1 or sn-3 fragments while sn-2 fragment appears as a singlet. (b) Formation of the sn-2 fragment from EIEIO of GPL ([M + H] ). (c) Formation of the sn-1 fragment via 2 - from MS CID of PC or LPC ([M + HCO ] ). Fig. 3. Schematics for isomer quantitation by isomer-resolving MS/MS: (a) forming diagnostic fragment ions for each isomer (A and B) by MS/MS and (b) constructing a calibration curve and obtaining molar fraction of each isomer if the synthetic standards are available for different biological samples (S1 and S2). If synthetic standards are not available, “relative fractional quantitation” is achieved from measuring the abundance ratios of the diagnostic ions (I /I ). A B Fig. 4. a) Heatmap of the C=C location isomers of GPLs in treated LNCaP cells relative to untreated cells (114), showing that SCD-1-related lipids (the n-7 and n-9 isomers) and FADS2-related lipids (the n-10 isomers) have inversed abundance shifts due to silencing of SCD1 and FADS2, respectively. (Reprinted with permission (114). Copyright 2021 Elsevier). b) Alterations in the relative amounts of the C=C location isomers of PC 34:2 in MDA-MB-468 single cells upon SCD1 inhibition (67) and c) significant decrease of the C16:1(n-7) and C18:1(n-7) isomers of PC 34:2. (Reprinted with permission (67). Copyright 2021 Springer Nature). d) Synthetic pathways of different C=C location isomers of monounsaturated FAs in human cells (modified from (114)). Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Table 1. A list of MS/MS approaches for characterization of complex lipids at the levels of C=C location and sn-position. Structure MS approach Lipids Samples Reference information Shotgun PB-MS/MS FA and GPL lipid extracts (58) LC-PB-MS/MS FA and GPL lipid extracts, plasma samples, (59-61, 65) GPL and MALDI-PB-MS/MS mouse brain tissue, (70, 122) glycosphingolipid, PC, cardiolipin, E. coli and human papillary thyroid (35, 36, 38, UVPD-MS FA, sphingolipid, carcinoma extracts 123) SM, TG LC-UVPD-MS FA and GPL bovine liver and porcine brain extracts (49, 63) DESI-UVPD-MS PC brain tissue, lymph node tissue (40) C=C OzID-MS GPL, SM, TG lipid extracts (27, 31) locations LC-OzID-MS PC, PE, SM human plasma (32) bovine liver extract, human plasma, (63, 72, 73, epoxidation-MS/MS FA and GPL yeast extract, serum samples 76) epoxidation-LC- FA and GPL human serum (76) MS/MS epoxidation-DESI- human serum, mouse adipocytes, and FA and GPL (76) MS/MS cancer tissue sections epoxidation-MALDI- FA cancer tissue samples, human cell lines (63) MS/MS HAD/OAD- MS/MS PC and LPC standards (56) + 3 (+Na ) PB-MS GPL human breast cancer cells (66) + 3 (+Na ) OzID-MS GPL cow brain and kidney extracts, (96, 98) + 3 (+Na ) UVPD-MS GP bovine liver and porcine brain extracts (34) sn- positions - 3 (+HCO ) PB-MS PC tissue samples of human breast cancer (100) 2+ 3 (+Fe ) UVPD-MS PC lipid extracts of mouse pancreas tissue (102) EIEIO PC egg yolk extracts (42) Journal Pre-proof http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Lipid Research American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-society-for-biochemistry-and-molecular-biology/deep-lipidotyping-by-mass-spectrometry-recent-technical-advances-and-cpvLgVNLyd

References (122)

Publisher
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
ISSN
0022-2275
eISSN
1539-7262
DOI
10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100219
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Journal Pre-proof Wenpeng Zhang, Ruijun Jian, Jing Zhao, Yikun Liu, Yu Xia PII: S0022-2275(22)00052-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100219 Reference: JLR 100219 To appear in: Journal of Lipid Research Received Date: 16 March 2022 Revised Date: 19 April 2022 Accepted Date: 20 April 2022 Please cite this article as: Zhang W, Jian R, Zhao J, Liu Y, Xia Y, Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications, Journal of Lipid Research (2022), doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jlr.2022.100219. This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. © 2022 THE AUTHORS. Published by Elsevier Inc on behalf of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry: recent technical advances and applications 1 2 2 1 2* Wenpeng Zhang, Ruijun Jian, Jing Zhao, Yikun Liu, Yu Xia State Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instruments, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China MOE Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry & Chemical Biological, Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, P. R. China *Corresponding Author Information: Yu Xia E-mail: [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0001-8694-9900 Short title: Deep-lipidotyping by mass spectrometry Funding sources: This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFA0800903) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 22074075). Journal Pre-proof Abstract In-depth structural characterization of lipids is an essential component of lipidomics. There has been a rapid expansion of mass spectrometry methods that are capable of resolving lipid isomers at various structural levels over the past decade. These developments finally make deep-lipidotyping possible, which provides new means to study lipid metabolism and discover new lipid biomarkers. In this review, we discuss recent advancements in tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods for identification of complex lipids beyond the species (known headgroup information) and molecular species (known chain composition) levels. These include identification at the levels of carbon-carbon double bond (C=C) location and sn-position as well as characterization of acyl chain modifications. We also discuss the integration of isomer-resolving MS/MS methods with different lipid analysis workflows and their applications in lipidomics. The results showcase the distinct capabilities of deep-lipidotyping in untangling the metabolism of individual isomers and sensitive phenotyping by using relative fractional quantitation of the isomers. Keywords: lipidomics; tandem mass spectrometry; lipid isomers; double bond location; sn-position; glycerolipids; glycerophospholipids; branched-chain fatty acids; liquid chromatography; phenotyping Journal Pre-proof The systems approach to lipids, which aims to reveal a complete network of the function and metabolism of lipids, and their interactions with other biomolecules in a biosystem, came into shape as “lipidomics” in early 2000s (1). Ever since, lipidomics has gradually emerged from being a subdiscipline of metabolomics into a more independent research field due to many differences in experimental approaches employed for the two cohorts of molecules (2). In the past decade, lipidomics has been increasingly employed in both basic and translational research while the lipidomic data are found instrumental in understanding metabolic changes of many diseases, including COVID-19 (3, 4). The advancement of lipidomics is supported by a variety of analytical techniques, especially mass spectrometry (MS), which provides a solution to large-scale lipid profiling. The development of state-of- the-art MS instruments, tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) methods tailored for lipid analysis, and the hyphenation of MS with high performance separation methods are the three pillars underpinning the fast growth of lipidomics. This is witnessed by over 2000 publications in the year of 2020 from searching the Web of Science with key words, “lipidomics” or “lipid analysis + mass spectrometry”, an almost two-fold increase from that of 2016 (https://www.webofscience.com/, 2022/01/03). Echoing the heated research activity was the establishment of the International Lipidomics Society (ILS) in 2019, with a clear goal to foster the development of new technologies, resources, data standardization (5), and etc. (https://lipidomicssociety.org/). This review is mainly focused on lipid identification, a rudimentary step to all lipid profiling experiments. The challenge of lipid identification stems from structural complexity and diversity. LIPIDMAPS curates more than 40,000 lipid molecules, which are classified into eight categories. Among them, fatty acids (FAs) are the building blocks of complex lipids, such as glycerolipids (GLs), glycerophospholipids (GPLs), and sphingolipids (SLs) (6). Conventionally, lipid extracts are analyzed by gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS) after saponification, in which the fatty acyls in complex lipids are hydrolyzed and esterified (7). This approach provides comprehensive profiling of total fatty acids from a given lipidome; however, the information of the intact structures of complex lipids is lost. Owing to the invention of soft ionization methods, namely electrospray ionization Journal Pre-proof (ESI) and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), complex lipids can be detected and structurally probed as a whole when coupled with MS/MS methods (8, 9). These two approaches can be classified as the “bottom-up” and the “top-down” lipid analysis, respectively, analogous to the terminology used in proteomics. Complete identification of a complex lipid, using a GPL molecule as an example, requires an elucidation on the following six structural levels (Fig. 1): 1) identity of the head group, 2) acyl composition, 3) location(s) of carbon-carbon double bond(s) (C=Cs), 4) sn-position of the acyl/ether chains on the glycerol backbone, 5) identity and location of functional group substitution (e.g., methyl branching and hydroxylation), and 6) the stereochemistry of C=Cs and the chiral centers. By employing high-resolution MS and MS/MS, information of the first two levels can be obtained from routine lipidomic profiling workflows. However, any variation at deeper structural levels (levels 3-6 in Fig. 1) leads to a plethora of isomeric structures that cannot be differentiated by mass measurements alone. So far, the high-performance separation methods are still struggling in providing a universal solution for the separation of lipid isomers. Moreover, due to lack of synthetic standards, even though isomers are separated, they cannot be assigned to a specific structure. The development of novel MS/MS techniques has been a valuable resource for characterizing biomolecules at high sensitivity. Notable examples in proteomics include using electron-based ion activation methods, i.e., electron-capture dissociation (ECD)(10) and electron-transfer dissociation (ETD), (11) to locate the site of phosphorylation and electron-induced dissociation (EID) to assign the linkage patterns in glycans(12). Similarly, active research efforts have been drawn from the mass spectrometry society on developing new MS/MS methods for top-down lipid analysis over the last decade, establishing deep-lipidotyping as an important tool for structural lipidomics (13). Fig. 1 summarizes the published MS/MS methods for retrieving each level of lipid structural information and corresponding nomenclature suggested by Liebisch et al. (14). Herein, discussions are focused on the recent development and applications of isomer-resolving MS/MS on deeper structural levels (levels 3-5 in Fig. 1), while more Journal Pre-proof mature techniques for the analysis of lipid class and chain composition are not discussed. The readers can find detailed discussion from the classical reviews (15, 16) and books (17, 18) on these topics. Fig. 1. Structural hierarchy of a complex lipid, represented by a phosphatidylethanolamine molecule: PE 16:1(9Z)/20:4(5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z). The “Δ” and “n-” annotations for the locations of C=C are indicated in the structure. The MS/MS methods that have been developed for characterizing at each structural level. *The identified structural levels are named according to Liebisch et al. (14) Lipid characterization at the C=C Location level Unsaturated lipids, of which one or more the fatty acyl chains contain at least one C=C, contribute to a significant portion of a lipidome (19). Studies have revealed close relationships between the C=C locations and cell membrane permeability (20), cholesterol-phospholipid interaction (21), and plasticity of cancer cells (22). Bottom-up analysis on total fatty acids via GC-MS is the gold-standard for profiling, in which identification of FAs is typically achieved through comparisons to that of the authentic standards. Brenna and co-workers developed acetonitrile chemical ionization (ACN-CI) which allowed for independent structural analysis of unsaturated FAMEs when coupled with collision-induced dissociation (CID) (23, 24). Charge-remote fragmentation (CRF) via high energy CID, viz. collision-energy (CE) higher than 1000 eV (lab frame) (25), of the deprotonated FAs, or low energy CID (CE < 200 eV, lab frame) of charge- derivatized FAs produces signature fragmentation pattern around the C=Cs for characterizing unsaturated FAs (26). However, the above methods cannot be directly applied for probing C=C locations in complex lipids. When the ions of complex lipids are subjected to CID, the most common MS/MS methods installed on commercial MS instruments, cleavage of the nonpolar bonds (C-C or C=C) is energetically unfavorable as compared to the polar bonds under charge-directed dissociation, such as ester or phosphoester linkages in complex lipids. Two approaches have been utilized to characterize the locations of C=C in complex lipids (Fig. 2). One involves the development of novel gas-phase ion activation/dissociation methods. These include Journal Pre-proof ozone-induced dissociation (OzID), ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD), electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO), metastable atom-activated dissociation (MAD), ion/ion reactions via charge remote fragmentation (CRF) mechanism, and radical-directed fragmentation (RDD). Alternatively, chemical derivatization of C=C to functional groups that can generate informative fragments of C=C locations via CID allows a wider accessibility for labs which do not have access to the specialized instruments. These derivatization methods include the Paternò-Büchi (PB) reaction, epoxidation, and singlet oxygen ( ΔO )-ene reaction. In the following sections, the basic principle of each method for locating C=C is discussed. Fig. 2 The two approaches for locating the C=Cs in lipids by MS. The gas-phase ion activation methods, including OzID, UVPD, CRF, EIEIO, RDD, MAD, etc., initiate fragmentations at or around a C=C. Alternatively, the C=C can be firstly transformed into functional groups that are prone to generating informative fragments in subsequent CID. The transformations can be achieved via the PB reaction, epoxidation, and ΔO -ene reaction. Gas-phase ion activation methods for locating C=C OzID Although ozonolysis is highly specific and efficient for cleaving a C=C in lipids, its application for the analysis of complex lipids has been hampered because of the difficulty in linking the identity of the intact lipid to its ozonolysis products when a mixture of unsaturated lipids undergoes ozonolysis altogether. This challenge is overcome by performing gas-phase ozonolysis of mass-isolated lipid ions inside an ion trapping unit, e.g., a quadrupole ion trap, in a mass spectrometer (27). Following the classic ozonolysis mechanism, the C=C bond is converted into a primary ozonide, which quickly decomposes into an aldehyde ion and a Criegee ion with a constant mass separation of 16 Da. Because of the clear mass relationship between the parent ion (intact lipid) and the two fragments resulting from ozonolysis, the location of C=C in a fatty acyl can be confidently determined (Scheme 1a). This technique was pioneered by Blanksby and co-workers in 2008 and coined as OzID (27). By coupling with different types of soft ionization methods, Journal Pre-proof OzID has been successfully applied for pinpointing the locations of C=C in various classes of lipids, including FAs, GPLs, GLs, and SLs (28). OzID is also incorporated into data-independent shotgun lipidomics workflow for fast profiling of lipids in human plasma (29). Even though the efficiency of gas- phase ozonolysis is approaching unit efficiency, OzID typically requires seconds of reaction time to accumulate detectable C=C diagnostic fragment ions due to the low number density of ozone allowed in an 9 12 −3 ion trap (10 − 10 molecules cm ) (27, 30). This aspect reduces the analysis speed and makes its hyphenation with liquid chromatography (LC) inefficient. To circumvent this limitation, Poad et al. incorporated OzID in a high pressure ion-mobility spectrometry (IMS) cell (31), in which the high number 15 −3 density of ozone (~10 molecules cm ) significantly accelerated ozonolysis, producing abundant C=C fragment ions within 100 ms. High-pressure OzID also facilitates inline coupling with LC separation and its application for the identification of a series of C=C location isomers of GPLs. By conducting ozonolysis in a high-pressure trapping ion funnel of an Agilent 6560 IMS QTOF, OzID is further shortened to 10 ms, thus compatible on the time scale of IMS. In this configuration ozonolysis cannot be conducted on mass- isolated ions; however, the hyphenation with a prior LC and subsequent IMS separations, viz. LC-OzID- IMS-MS, aids in the assignment of ozonolysis products to their associated precursor ions for confident C=C location determination in a non-targeted fashion (32). High pressure-OzID also greatly improves the -1 acquisition rates (up to 5 pixels s ) for MALDI-MS/MS imaging of both C=C and sn-position isomers in biological tissues, which was recently demonstrated on a SYNAPT HDMS G2-Si Q-TOF mass spectrometer (33). Scheme 1. Gas-phase ion dissociation methods for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) OzID, (b) UVPD, and (c) EIEIO. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. UVPD. Brodbelt and Reid groups independently reported the application of 193 nm UVPD for locating C=Cs in lipids in 2017 (34, 35). The dissociation is mainly driven by electronic excitation of a C=C due to the absorption of photons of wavelength around 200 nm. This process subsequently initiates cleavages at Journal Pre-proof the vinylic C-C and forms a pair of diagnostic ions with mass difference of 24 Da (Scheme 1b). Although the mechanistic detail is not entirely clear, it is hypothesized that the diradical formed from the photo- excited C=C is responsible for the vinylic cleavages and several other RDD channels (34). The 193 nm UVPD has been implemented in the HCD cell on Orbitrap Elite mass spectrometer and a low-pressure trap on Orbitrap Fusion Lumos mass spectrometer, with 10 laser pulses being used per activation (~20 ms). More recently, 213 nm UVPD, which can be chosen as an add-on module on the Orbitrap mass spectrometers, has been demonstrated for lipid analysis. 213 nm UVPD shows almost identical fragmentation phenomenon as that of 193 nm UVPD; however, it takes longer time (200 ms) for activation owing to its lower power of the laser source (36). The UVPD methods have been applied to different classes of lipids for locating the C=Cs, such as GPLs (34, 37), cardiolipins (38), fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acids (36), and SLs (35). It has recently been successfully coupled with LC-MS for enhancing quantitation capability for C=C location isomers (39) and with DESI for isomer-resolving imaging (40). A limitation of UVPD for analysis of C=C location is its inherent low fragmentation efficiency due to low photon absorption by a C=C; thus, it often requires a magnification of the spectrum for the detection of diagnostic ions. Using laser source of higher power or incorporating more efficient chromophores in lipids may help improving the sensitivity for characterizing lipids at the C=C location level. EIEIO EIEIO or electron-induced dissociation (EID) was first developed by Freiser and Cody in 1979 as an alternative dissociation method for singly charged ions (41). This electron-based ion activation concept was adopted for lipid analysis by Baba and Campbell on a modified Q-TOF in 2015 (42) and later by Kane and co-workers on an FT-ICR instrument (43). During EIEIO, positively charged lipid ions are allowed to interact with an electron beam of kinetic energy around 10 eV. Due to electronic excitation of the parent ions, many high energy and radical-directed dissociation channels are activated. This process produces rich fragmentation in lipids, from which multi-level structural information can be extracted from a single EIEIO spectrum, including the identity of head groups, the location of C=C, the configuration of C=C, sn-position, and even the identity of glycans in complex lipids (42, 44-46). This also means that EIEIO is not a fragmentation method specific to C=C. For a saturated fatty acyl chain, EIEIO forms a Journal Pre-proof continuous series of fragment ions differing by CH (14.014 Da) resulting from C-C cleavages along the chain. For an unsaturated fatty acyl chain, the vinylic C-C cleavages and direct C=C cleavages are disfavored relative to the allylic C-C cleavages (Scheme 1c). This difference in relative peak intensities produces a “V” shape fragmentation pattern, which is used for locating a C=C in a fatty acyl chain. However, intrachain fragments generated from the other fatty acyl chains in complex lipids such as in GPLs and GLs may cause interferences and these fragments should be carefully differentiated for confident C=C determination. Computer-assisted spectral interpretation is typically needed for locating C=C from EIEIO (44). Given the complexity of the EIEIO spectra, a prior separation of isobaric or isomeric lipid species is helpful in increasing the confidence for lipid identification. By coupling with differential ion mobility spectrometry (DMS) for fast lipid species separation, more than 400 lipid molecules including GPLs, GLs, SMs, and glycosphingolipids have been annotated at detailed structural levels from porcine brain lipid extracts (47). The ZenoTOF 7600 mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) is installed with an EIEIO module, allowing EIEIO to be more accessible for lipid analysis. Other gas-phase ion activation methods. RDD, CRF, MAD-CID, HAD, and OAD have also been demonstrated for locating the C=Cs in complex lipid structures. These methods rely on accessing radical- directed dissociation or higher energy activation channels to achieve rich fragmentation along fatty acyl chain. The RDD concept for complex lipid analysis was demonstrated by Blanksby and co-workers in 2012 (48). In the RDD approach, lipid molecules are derivatized or complexed with a structural moiety containing a photo-liable aryl-iodine. The modified lipids are ionized by ESI as even-electron ions and then subjected to 266 nm UVPD, from which lipid radical ions are uncaged from the homolytic cleavage of C-I in the gas phase. By applying an additional stage of CID to the radical ions, the site of radical is mobilized from the benzyl radical to the methylene groups along the fatty acyl chain due to an almost uniform hydrogen atom transfer. Subsequent RDD induces intrachain cleavages driven by the stability of the product species, from which a characteristic 12 Da spacing of the intrachain fragments is observed for the site of C=C as compared to 14 Da spacing for saturated fatty acyls. This signature is used in the MS PD- CID experiments for locating C=C in unsaturated lipids. It is worth noting that RDD from the allylic Journal Pre-proof position of the C=C is a prominent fragmentation channel directly resulting from 266 nm UVPD of the aryl-iodine derivatized lipids (49), which facilitates the analysis of C=C location isomers in a mixture of 37 FAs implemented on an LC-MS platform (50). Charge-remote fragmentation (CRF) along the fatty acyl chain has been demonstrated for unsaturated FA analysis via high energy CID of deprotonated anions on sector instruments (51) and later via low energy CID on metal adduct of FA or fixed charged derivatized FA cations (26, 52). McLuckey group used charge inversion ion/ion chemistry to synthesize the metal adduct of FA, e.g. the complex cations between fatty acid and phenanthroline magnesium ([FA-H+MgPhen] ), inside a mass spectrometer; subsequent low energy CID of the complex triggered CRF along the fatty acid chain, leading to the characteristic “V” pattern around a C=C for unsaturated FAs (53) . The same principle was later applied for the structural analysis of GPLs, in which the anions of GPL molecules were firstly fragmentated by CID to generate fatty acid anions before going through charge-inversion ion/ion chemistry and subsequent CID steps (54). Jackson group developed an MS MAD-CID approach, in which the singly charged PC cations was firstly converted to the corresponding radical cations by interreacting with metastable helium atom (~20 eV), then mass-isolated, and fragmented by low energy CID (55). The overall fragmentation pattern induced by MAD-CID is similar to that reported from EIEIO. Takahashi et al. developed hydrogen abstraction dissociation (HAD) and oxygen attachment dissociation (OAD) for the structural analysis of GPLs (56). The interaction between the lipid ions and a neutral hydrogen atom (H•) inside an ion trap induces RDD along the fatty acyl chain. When using OH• and O for the reaction, the C=C is first oxidized and then fragmentated at the adjacent methylene bridges, allowing for the assignment of the C=Cs (56). Due to the requirement of sophisticated MS instrumentation and limited sensitivity, these methods have not yet been applied for large-scale lipid analysis. C=C specific derivatization coupled with MS/MS PB-MS/MS The PB reaction is a [2+2] cycloaddition reaction between an electronically excited ketone or aldehyde and a C=C. The reaction is highly specific to a C=C and can be accomplished in moderate yield (around 30%) within a minute under UV irradiation for a broad range of lipid classes when performed in Journal Pre-proof flow microreactors. Acetone was used as the PB reagent and an ESI solvent in the first demonstration by Ma and Xia in 2014 (57). The reaction was directly performed inside a borosilicate glass emitter of nanoelectrospray ionization (nanoESI) upon irradiation by a 254-nm UV lamp. In such a process, the unsaturated lipids are derivatized online, ionized, and directly subjected to MS analysis. Two regio-PB products (P and P ) are formed from the cyclization reaction, resulting from two relative orientations of 1 2 the addition (Scheme 2a). Subsequent MS CID of the mixture of PB products generates a pair of C=C diagnostic fragment ions, one containing an olefin at the cleavage site (F ) while the other containing an aldehyde (F ). These ions provide definitive information for pinpointing the locations of the C=Cs. The acetone PB reaction has been incorporated in the shotgun analysis workflow for identification and relative quantitation of fatty acids and several classes of phospholipids in biological samples (58). It has also been online coupled with LC-MS systems, where a photochemical flow microreactor is connected in between the LC unit and the ESI source. By employing acetone as the mobile phase solvent for hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC), more than 200 GPLs were identified at the C=C location level from different types of biological samples, including bovine liver extracts, different types of mouse tissue, human plasma, and human breast cancer tissue (59). Improved capability for the identification at the location of C=C level can be achieved for ether vs. diacyl GPL isobaric species, chain composition isomers, and C=C E/Z isomers by coupling the acetone PB reaction with reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) (60). It is noted that MS CID of the PB products typically produces more abundant diagnostic ions in positive ion mode than negative ion mode. For anionic GPLs, such as PG and PI, phosphate methylation can be performed prior to PB-MS/MS in positive ion mode, which improves the limit of identification (LOI, 5 nM for the synthetic standards) (61). Besides, PB-MS/MS has also been incorporated into sampling tip- based devices for the analysis of lipid C=C location isomers in single cells(62). A series of aryl ketones and aldehydes have been developed besides acetone, rendering a flexibility in choosing the most suitable PB reagents for a specific application in lipid analysis (63). For instance, acetyl pyridines (3- and 2-acpy) have been developed as the charge-tagging/switching PB reagents, which improve the limit of identification for nonpolar lipids including FAs, cholesteryl easters (CEs), and GLs down to the Journal Pre-proof 3 4 C=C location level (64, 65). By coupling 2-acpy PB reaction with MS or MS -CID, the locations of C=Cs can be confidently determined with sn-chain specificity for GPLs (66). The high sensitivity of 2-acpy PB- MS/MS further enables single cell lipidomic analysis at the C=C location level (67). A very important aspect of the PB reaction is its combability with different lipid analysis settings, including MS imaging (MSI) and direct analysis (68, 69). Bednarik et al. demonstrated coupling offline on- tissue benzaldehyde PB reaction with MALDI-2-MS/MS (70). Distinct distribution of the Δ9 versus Δ11 C=C isomers of PS 18:1_18:1 was revealed in the white and gray areas of mouse cerebellum. By developing PB molecules which could also function as the MALDI matrix, such as benzophenone and 2- benzoylpyridine, Heiles group demonstrated PB derivatization upon 343 nm laser irradiation during the normal MALDI process. Isomer-resolved MS imaging of PCs at the C=C location level is achieved with high lateral resolution (10 μm) in mouse pancreas tissue sections (71). Scheme 2. Double bond specific derivatization methods coupled with subsequent MS/MS for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) the PB reaction, (b) epoxidation, and (c) ΔO -ene reaction. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. Epoxidation-MS/MS. Epoxidation converts a C=C to a polar and highly strained three-membered ring. By performing CID on the lipid epoxides, a pair of ions different by 16 Da are formed from ring rupture, which allows for the assignment of C=C location (Scheme 2b). Lipid epoxidation can be achieved by reacting with oxidative species formed in situ in a solution or during nanoESI process or with peracids in bulk solution. Zhao et al. developed an epoxidation strategy by blowing helium low-temperature plasma (He-LTP) into FAs dissolved in acetone/water solution (72). Almost quantitative conversion of mono- unsaturated FAs was achieved within one minute. Chemically unstable dioxirane (Scheme 2b) is hypothesized to be the epoxidation reagent. For the analysis of GPLs, acetonitrile is a better solvent for in situ epoxidation via He-LTP, in which peroxycarboximidic acid is likely the oxidant (73). Epoxidation has Journal Pre-proof also been demonstrated via electrochemistry during the process of nanoESI (74) (75). These in situ epoxidation methods have the advantage of facile and fast analysis of unsaturated lipids. The classical epoxidation reaction via meta-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (m-CPBA) was adopted for lipid analysis by Li group (76) and Hsu group (77), independently. Efficient conversion can be achieved for unsaturated FAs (>70%) and GPLs (26-91%) at room temperature within one hour. The limit of detection of C=C diagnostic ions is at nM range for mono- and poly-unsaturated FAs and sub-μM range for 3 4 GPLs, the latter of which is mainly limited by performing MS for MS CID in negative ion mode (77). The above epoxidation strategy has been integrated with direct fusion ESI, LC-MS, and DESI for imaging lipid C=C location isomers in tissue sections. Very recently, peracetic acid was used as the epoxidation reagent and it was applied for mapping C=C location isomers of FAs in tissues via MALDI-MS/MS (63). Other epoxidation strategies have also been explored; for example, Oxone was used as the epoxidation reagent and applied for the analysis of FA C=C isomers in human plasma samples (78); epoxidation of unsaturated FAs was achieved by pulsed corona discharge generated by triboelectric nanogenerators (79) and by atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (80). 1 1 𝚫 O -ene reaction. A C=C can be converted to hydroperoxides by reacting with singlet oxygen ( ΔO ) 2 2 existed in ambient air (81) or formed by photosensitizing (82). MS CID of lipid hydroperoxides produces fragments indicative of C=C locations in unsaturated lipids (Scheme 2c). In the report by Laskin and co- workers (83), rose bengal dissolved in the ESI or nano-DESI spray solution was used as the photosensitizer, while a green laser pointer (532 nm) was used to initiate the formation of ΔO . A reaction yield around 30% can be achieved with reaction time estimated shorter than 250 ms. This method has been demonstrated for ambient imaging of lipid isomers via nano-DESI from animal tissue sections. Characterization at the sn-position level GPLs and GLs are de novo synthesized and dynamically modified for fatty acyl compositions in the cell (84, 85). These processes generate an array of chain compositional isomers as well as sn-isomers. For analysis of GPLs at the sn-position level, selective hydrolysis of the ester bond at sn-1 or sn-2 position via Journal Pre-proof phospholipases A (PLA and PLA ) followed by LC-MS analysis is the gold-standard, albeit of low- 1 2 throughput (86, 87). MS CID of the anions of GPLs typically produces more abundant fragment ions due to neutral loss of the sn-2 chain than the sn-1 fatty acyl chain; thus, their abundance ratios have been used to differentiate the sn-isomers. The ion abundance ratio, however, is dependent on the headgroup, fatty acyl identity, and instrument conditions, rendering a relatively high uncertainty especially for isomer quantitation (88). The analysis of monoacylglycerides (MAGs) and diacylglycerides (DAGs) can be complicated by facile α-hydroxy acyl migration besides their low endogenous abundances (89). Reports on the analysis of MAGs and DAGs at the sn-position level mainly rely on the chemical modification of the free hydroxyl group(s) to reduce acyl migration and produce signature fragmentation patterns for the sn-isomers via 2 2 subsequent MS CID (90, 91). On the other hand, MS CID of the ammonium adduct ions of TAGs forms abundant DAG product ions, which is widely used for identification of GLs at the fatty acyl composition level (92). It is observed that the neutral loss of fatty acyls as free fatty acids from sn‐ 1/3 positions are more favorable than the sn‐ 2 position. However, the abundance ratios of these DAG product ions are also dependent on the fatty acid compositions, especially at the presence of PUFA, making this method less rigorous for differentiating sn-isomers (93). Hsu and Turk showed that further CID of the DAG ions improved differentiation among positional isomers due to an exclusive loss of the sn-2 chain as an 𝛼 ,𝛽 - unsaturated FA (94). However, non-linear effects exist thus complicating its application for the analysis of complex TAG mixtures. In a mechanistic study conducted by Hsu and Turk, they proved that the Cα-H on fatty acyl chains instead of the C -H on glycerol backbone participated in the phospho-head group loss (HOE loss in Scheme 3a) from CID of PC cations ([M + H/Li] ) (95). A preference to removing the Cα-H on sn-2 over sn-1 chain forms a dioxolane ring in the product ions (structure shown in Scheme 3a). This mechanistic insight facilitates the development of a suite of new MS/MS methods for analysis of the sn-isomers of GPLs and GLs. For instance, noticing that the proposed fragment structure contains a newly formed C=C between C1 and C2 of the fatty acyl chain, Blanksby and co-workers conducted MS CID-OzID experiments on GPLs Journal Pre-proof + ([M + Na] ) and proved the formation of the dioxolane-type products as the dominant pathway (96), the structure of which was recently corroborated by cryogenic infrared spectroscopy (cryo-IR) measurements (97). More importantly, OzID of the newly formed C=C in the dioxolane-type products provides fragment ions only containing the sn-1 chain information, allowing definitive assignment of the sn-geometry in GPLs (Scheme 3b). The relative ion abundances of the OzID products can be used to achieve relative quantitation of sn-isomers of GPLs, which are of great value especially when the isomers cannot be chromatographically separated (98). Scheme 3. The MS/MS methods capable of analyzing GPLs and TAGs at the sn-position level. (a) 2 + Formation of a dioxolane-type fragment ion from MS CID of [M + Na] of GPLs. Loss of the sn-2 C𝛼 -H 2/3 is the exclusive pathway involved in the phospho-headgroup loss (-HOE) from MS CID of protonated or metal adduct of GPLs. The dioxolane-type fragment ion contains a C=C newly formed between the first two carbons of the sn-2 acyl chain. For TAGs, the C𝛼 -H can be lost from any of the three sn-positions and thus four structures of dioxolane-type fragment ions are formed if the three chains have different masses. 3 3 3 (b) MS CID-OzID, (c) MS CID-UVPD, and (d) 2-acpy PB coupled with MS CID for analysis of sn- isomer of GLPs. Targeting the unique C=C formed in the dioxolane-type fragment ions, 193 nm UVPD was incorporated in an MS CID-UVPD sequence for the assignment of sn-position isomers of GPLs ([M + Na] ) (34) . UVPD cleaves multiple bonds of the five-membered dioxolane ring, producing more diverse product ions than the CID-OzID approach (Scheme 3c). MS CID of the 2-acpy PB products of GPLs ([M + Na] ) is also capable of forming the dioxolane-type fragment ions. By conducting a further stage of CID, sn-specific product ions can be obtained (Scheme 3d). Using 2-acpy, the PB-MS CID method allows for the identification of the C=C locations and sn-positions in the same mass spectra. Interestingly, the conventional PB reagents such as acetone and benzophenone do not produce abundant dioxolane-type Journal Pre-proof product ions via CID, while the 2-acpy PB products provide about ~20 folds enhancement of the dioxolane- type of product ions (66) . Although the dioxolane-type fragments are also formed from the neutral loss of FA via MS CID of TAG ([M + Na] ), the analysis of a mixture of TAG sn-isomers turns out to be more challenging. This is because MS CID of each sn-pure TAG can produce four dioxolane-type fragments if the three chains are different in mass (Scheme 3a). Further application of OzID/UVPD on these dioxolane product ions will generate FA fragment ions with overlapping m/z to those from the sn-isomers, making independent identification difficult. A combination of sn-resolving separation techniques with these MS/MS methods is most suitable for the identification and quantitation of TAG sn-isomers (99). EIEIO is capable of pinpointing sn-isomers of GPLs and TAGs without a need for isomer separation. Upon EIEIO the fragment peaks resulting from the loss of two fatty acyl chains are diagnostic to the assignment of sn-positions for TAGs (Scheme 4a). The combined loss of the sn-1(or sn-3) and sn-2 fatty acyl chains leads to the formation of a doublet with 2 Da difference in mass, signature for fatty acyl located at either sn-1 or sn-3. The fragmentation scheme for the formation of sn-1 fragments is shown as an example in Scheme 4a. On the other hand, the double loss of sn-1 and sn-3 fatty acyls forms the sn-2 fragment ions as a singlet. For GPLs, EIEIO can induce a cleavage between C1-C2 in the glycerol backbone, forming a distinct sn-2 fragment ion for the sn-position assignment (Scheme 4b) (42). Baba et al. coupled DMS with EIEIO and demonstrated detailed structural analysis of over 300 lipids together with relative quantitation of the sn-isomers of some GPLs and GLs (47). Scheme 4. (a) Formation of the sn-specific fragment ions from EIEIO of TAG ([M +Na] ). The doublet with 2 Da mass difference is a signature for sn-1 or sn-3 fragments while sn-2 fragment appears as a singlet. (b) Formation of the sn-2 fragment from EIEIO of GPL ([M + H] ). (c) Formation of the sn-1 fragment via 2 - from MS CID of PC or LPC ([M + HCO ] ). Journal Pre-proof - The phosphocholine head group establishes strong hydrogen bonding with bicarbonate anion (HCO ). 2 - MS CID of this complex ([M + HCO ] ) induces a homolytic C-N cleavage within the choline moiety and generates the carbon-centered radical anions which further dissociate to from the sn-1 fragment (Scheme 4c). Based on this RDD pathway, Zhao et al. established an LC-MS/MS workflow for the identification and quantitation of the sn-isomers of PCs (100) and LPCs in lipid extracts (101). In another report, Heiles group 2+ showed that 213 nm UVPD of PC ([M + Fe] ) produced signature fragment ions for the assignment of sn- isomers of PCs from lipid extracts (102). Characterization of chain modifications Methyl branched chain fatty acids (BCFAs) are abundant in bacteria, skin secretions, rumen tissue, and milk (103). Brenna and co-workers have developed EI-MS CID (104) and covalent adduct chemical ionization (CACI)- MS CID for structural elucidation and quantitation of the methyl esters of BCFAs (105, 106). These methods enabled the discovery of fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) as the desaturase for branched chain and odd chain saturated fatty acids (107). Cyclopropane modification is commonly found in various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria (108). This modification is catalyzed by cyclopropane fatty acid synthase in which process a methylene group derived from S-adenosylmethionine is inserted to a C=C (109). The cyclopropane group has a weak absorption around the wavelength of 200 nm and can be dissociated by 193 nm or 213 nm UVPD via dual cross-ring C−C cleavages on both sides of the cyclopropane ring. The diagnostic ions are mass separated by 14 Da, different from UVPD of a C=C, thus enabling the identification and localization of cyclopropane on a fatty acyl chain. Brodbelt and co-workers integrated 213 nm UVPD with LC-MS/MS and identified a series of cyclopropyl GLPs in Escherichia coli (E. coli) and mycolic acids in Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) and tuberculosis lipid extracts (110). CRF and RDD are both capable of inducing C-C cleavages along fatty acyl chain. This unique aspect has been utilized to characterize various chain modifications. Han and co-workers demonstrated that the distinct MS CID fragmentation patterns of chain modification isomers were generated from fixed-charge derivatization of FAs. The types of modifications being evaluated include nitrosylation, hydroxylation, and Journal Pre-proof methyl branching (26). Blanksby group and Julian group applied RDD for the analysis of chain modifications via UVPD of C-I bond in covalently modified lipids (50) or lipids non-covalently complexed with a photocaged radical initiator (48). One common feature of these derivatization reagents is that they all contain a photolabile aryl–iodide motif, which can liberate an aryl radical upon 266 nm UVPD at high efficiency. Acyl chain modifications include methyl branching, cyclopropane modification, hydroxylation on FAs can be identified and localized from performing MS UVPD-CID. By employing a new generation of photocaged radical initiator, 1-(3-(aminomethyl)-4-iodophenyl)pyridin-1-ium (4-I-AMPP ), Blanksby and co-workers found that 266 nm UVPD was efficient in producing direct photolysis of C-C bonds adjacent to the hydroxyl group (111). Additionally, RDD produces a distinctive 29 Da spacing for simple hydroxyl fatty acids (HFAs) derivatized by 4-I-AMPP+, while a 30 Da spacing was observed for polyunsaturated HFAs, e.g., isomers from the hydroxyeicosatetraenoic (HETE) acid and hydroxyeicosapentaenoic (HEPE) acid families. This method is compatible with LC-MS analysis time frame and has a potential to be employed for the identification of chain modified fatty acids in biological matrices. The RDD approach via CID of the [M + HCO ] (M: PC, LPC, SM) has been utilized for the characterization of chain modifications (101). By integrating on an LC-MS system, the iso- and anteiso- branched LPC 17:0 isomers have been identified and relatively quantified (101). In another report, C-2 hydroxylation of N-acyls and iso-methyl branched sphingosine base were identified from SMs of C. elegans (112). The intrachain fragments generated from these methods are of relatively low ion abundances, thus limiting the sensitivity of this method. Quantitation of lipid isomers Given that lipid isomers are derived from distinct biosynthetic pathways, quantitation of lipids at various isomeric levels is important to deepen the understanding of lipid metabolism. For situations where the isomers can be well resolved by separations and the synthetic standards are available, isomer quantitation is straightforward by constructing the calibration curve from their synthetic standards. The above situation, Journal Pre-proof however, is rarely encountered, especially for complex lipids. The more frequent cases are that either the synthetic standards of the lipid isomers are not available, nor can they be separated under typical separation conditions used in large-scale lipid profiling. Under these circumstances isomer-resolving MS/MS methods as discussed in previous sections are instrumental in providing quantitation of lipid isomers. For instance, a linear calibration curve can be obtained by plotting the abundance ratios of the diagnostic ions as a function of the molar ratios of the isomers when the synthetic standards of the isomers are available, however, not resolved by separations (Fig. 3a). The molar fraction of the isomers from an unknown can thus be extracted from the calibration curve (Fig. 3b). When the total quantity of the isomer is known, the concentration information can be further obtained. Examples of isomer quantitation following this principle have been shown for both C=C location isomers and sn-isomers (58, 65). When the standards are not available, only “relative fractional quantitation” can be obtained because how the structural differences of the isomers might affect ionization and fragmentation is unknown. In this case, the abundance ratios or fractions of the diagnostic ions are directly used for relative fractional quantitation. Relative fractional quantitation is very useful as a readout for monitoring dysregulated lipid metabolism in various applications as discussed in the latter section. Isomer quantitation has also been performed using a certain pattern of the fragment ions when diagnostic ions are not formed, in which more complex calibrations are involved (26, 47, 113). Fig. 3. Schematics for isomer quantitation by isomer-resolving MS/MS: (a) forming diagnostic fragment ions for each isomer (A and B) by MS/MS and (b) constructing a calibration curve and obtaining molar fraction of each isomer if the synthetic standards are available for different biological samples (S1 and S2). If synthetic standards are not available, “relative fractional quantitation” is achieved from measuring the abundance ratios of the diagnostic ions (I /I ). A B Applications of detailed lipid structural analysis Journal Pre-proof In recently years the isomer-resolving MS/MS methods are increasingly applied for identification and quantitation of complex lipids at the levels of C=C location and sn-position as summarized in Table 1. These types of detailed information provide direct experimental evidence to studying the metabolism of lipid isomers. Young et al. used OzID-MS/MS to investigate substrate promiscuity of the human fatty acid desaturase FADS2 (114). In combination with gene silencing and stable isotope tracing, FADS2 was found to promote the production of n-8, n-10, and n-12 lipid species that have rarely been reported previously in human cell lines (Fig. 4a). The distribution of lipid isomers in tumor microenvironment was further revealed by MALDI-OzID-MS/MS imaging, suggesting distinct enzyme-substrate interactions in tumor regions. In another report, Li et al. studied the response of cellular lipidome under SCD1 inhibition at the single-cell level (67). The relative amounts of lipid C=C location isomers in MDA-Mb-468 cell lines were found to change significantly after SCD1 inhibition by CAY10566 (Fig. 4b). The abundances of PCs containing the n-7 isomers of C16:1 and C18:1 decreased significantly upon inhibition while the abundances of PCs containing C18:2 (n-6, n-9) and the n-10 isomers of C16:1 and C18:1 increased (Fig. 4c). This may be resulted from an enhanced FADS2 activity due to the inhibition of SCD1. Fig. 4. a) Heatmap of the C=C location isomers of GPLs in treated LNCaP cells relative to untreated cells (114), showing that SCD-1-related lipids (the n-7 and n-9 isomers) and FADS2-related lipids (the n-10 isomers) have inversed abundance shifts due to silencing of SCD1 and FADS2, respectively. (Reprinted with permission (114). Copyright 2021 Elsevier). b) Alterations in the relative amounts of the C=C location isomers of PC 34:2 in MDA-MB-468 single cells upon SCD1 inhibition (67) and c) significant decrease of the C16:1(n-7) and C18:1(n-7) isomers of PC 34:2. (Reprinted with permission (67). Copyright 2021 Springer Nature). d) Synthetic pathways of different C=C location isomers of monounsaturated FAs in human cells (modified from (114)). Mammalian C18:1 typically consists of n-9 (or Δ9) and n-7 (or Δ11) as the two major C=C location isomers resulting from distinct biosynthetic pathways (Fig. 4d). The relative abundance of the isomers can Journal Pre-proof be affected due to a dysregulated lipid metabolism caused by the unset or progression of disease. For instance, the relative compositions of the n-9 and n-7 isomers of C18:1 in a variety of PCs and PEs were found to change significantly between plasma samples of normal control and type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients and tissue samples from breast cancer patients using an LC-PB-MS/MS method (59). In combination with methylation and charge-tagging, PB-MS/MS also enabled sensitive screening of potential plasma lipid C=C isomer biomarkers of T2D in other classes of lipids such as anionic GPLs (61), FAs (65), DGs, and TGs (115). By discrimination of both C=C and sn-isomers of GPLs, it showed further advantage in phenotyping different disease states and discovery of differentiating lipids (66). For example, no statistically significant change was obtained by using either relative abundance of C=C location isomers or sn-position isomers of certain GPLs for the discrimination of non-small cell lung cancer tissues from adjacent normal tissues. However, using information from both C=C and sn-isomers from a series of GPLs, all the tissues were correctly classified by hierarchical cluster analysis. Paine et al. applied MALDI-OzID-MSI for the analysis of medulloblastoma tumor in mouse brain tissue samples (33, 116). Altered isomeric populations in the tumor were observed relative to the surrounding white and gray matter, such as the sn-isomers of PC 16:0_18:1, PC 18:0/18:1, and PC 16:0_20:1, and the n-7 C=C location isomers in PC 34:1 and PC 36:1. Marshall et al. incorporated OzID into data-independent shotgun lipidomics workflow for two-dimensional characterization of lipid isomers in human plasma (29). It revealed that most unsaturated lipids were present as isomeric mixtures, some of which showed common origins in lipid biosynthesis, indicating that human plasma lipidome may be a valuable resource to unresolved new lipid isomers biomarkers. In a recent report, significant alterations in n-10/n-9 ratios of lipids in human prostate tissues were demonstrated, including PS 34:1, PS 36:1, PE 36:1, and PC 34:1 (114). Klein et al. coupled DESI with UVPD for imaging C=C location isomers in tissue samples (40). For human lymph node tissue containing thyroid cancer metastasis, the intensity ratios of PC 16:0_18:1(n-9) to PC 16:0_18:1(n-7) showed different distributions between normal and cancerous portions of the tissue. DESI-UVPD-MSI allowed the discrimination of breast cancer subtypes of different hormone receptor status based on the relative abundances of the n-9 and n-7 isomers of FA 18:1 (117). Journal Pre-proof DESI-MSI via a prior mCPBA epoxidation revealed significant increase of PG 16:0_18:1(n-7) isomer in the tumor cell regions (77). Using peracetic acid for epoxidation, an MALDI-MSI approach was recently reported, which showed high sensitivity for imaging the C=C location isomers of FAs in murine melanoma tumor (63). Conclusions and Outlook We have seen a rapid expansion of MS/MS methods capable of resolving lipid isomers at various structural levels over the past few years. These developments lead to the discovery of novel lipid molecules, show the possibility to untangle lipid metabolism involving isomers, and offer a new direction for biomarker discovery. While promising, many of the techniques are in the early stage of development; further technical advancement is needed for them to evolve as the tool of choice for lipid profiling in the future. For instance, most methods work better in positive ion mode regarding formation of the diagnostic fragment ions, which thus have limited sensitivity for anionic lipids (e.g., PA and PI) and nonpolar lipids (e.g., FA, GL, and CE). Some successes have been achieved by enhancing ionization of these lipid classes in positive ion mode via phosphate methylation or charge-tagging. Nevertheless, isomer-resolving MS/MS methods which are independent of the charge polarity of lipids need to be explored. It is also desirable to integrate isomer- resolving MS/MS methods with different lipidomic analysis workflows, especially LC-MS, one of the major platforms for lipid analysis. This requires innovations in instrumentation to shorten the ion activation time of MS/MS to tens of ms while still produce abundant diagnostic fragment ions so that they can be compatible with LC separations. With new developments in methodologies and instrumentation, IMS has gained increasing attention in MS applicaitons during past few years (118). IMS provides a dimension of separation according to the collision cross sections of lipid ions in tens of milliseconds timescale (119), which is readily compatible with shotgun analysis, LC separations, MS imaging, and isomer-resolving MS/MS on several commercial mass spectrometers. While there are solutions for locating C=C or sn- position in lipids as emphasized in this review, new MS methods, likely through an integration with gas- Journal Pre-proof phase spectroscopy, such as cryo-infrared spectroscopy (120), are needed to solve more challenging structural problems, including stereo-configuration of the C=C and the identity of the glycans. There is always a trade-off between sensitivity and the level of structural information one can get. For the MS methods discussed herein, they typically offer a limit of identification in the range of nM to sub-μM, one to two orders of magnitude higher than the measurements without differentiating lipid isomers. To push detailed structural analysis to the lipids of lower abundances, such as lipid mediators or single cell lipidome, an integration with pre-enrichment methods will help in this regard. With the new capabilities of deep-lipidotyping, of equal importance is development of tools for data analysis and automated lipid annotation at deeper structural levels (121). This development is critical to speeding up the transfer of new MS methods from expert labs to ordinary lipid analysis labs. Due to the shortage of the lipid standards, it remains challenging for quantitation of complex lipids in biological samples. Relative quantitation of lipid isomers thus provides a simple and effective means to study the change of lipids from different biological states. Several examples have shown that relative quantitation of C=C location isomers or sn-position isomers is more sensitive in the discovery of differentiating lipids which might be potential biomarkers. It is expected that more lipidomics labs will be interested in using deep-lipidotyping as a new means to investigate lipid functions and metabolism. Author Contributions W. Z. and Y. X. wrote the manuscript. R. J., J. Z., and Y. L. prepared the figures. All authors critically reviewed the article. References 1. Han, X., and R. W. Gross. (2003). Global analyses of cellular lipidomes directly from crude extracts of biological samples by ESI mass spectrometry: a bridge to lipidomics. J. Lipid Res. 44: 1071- 2. Wenk, M. R. (2005). The emerging field of lipidomics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 4: 594-610. 3. Wenk, M. R. (2010). Lipidomics: New Tools and Applications. Cell 143: 888-895. 4. Lam, S. M., C. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Ni, S. Zhang, S. Yang, X. Huang, L. Mo, J. Li, B. Lee, M. Mei, L. Huang, M. Shi, Z. Xu, F. P. Meng, W. J. Cao, M. J. Zhou, L. Shi, G. H. Chua, B. Li, J. Cao, J. Journal Pre-proof Wang, S. Bao, Y. Wang, J. W. Song, F. Zhang, F. S. Wang, and G. Shui. (2021). A multi-omics investigation of the composition and function of extracellular vesicles along the temporal trajectory of COVID-19. Nat. Metab. 3: 909-922. 5. Lipidomics Standards Initiative, C. (2019). Lipidomics needs more standardization. Nat. Metab. 1: 745-747. 6. Currie, E., A. Schulze, R. Zechner, T. C. Walther, and R. Farese Jr. (2013). Cellular fatty acid metabolism and cancer. Cell Metab. 18: 153-161. 7. Quehenberger, O., A. M. Armando, and E. A. Dennis. (2011). High sensitivity quantitative lipidomics analysis of fatty acids in biological samples by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1811: 648-656. 8. Schwudke, D., J. T. Hannich, V. Surendranath, V. Grimard, T. Moehring, L. Burton, T. Kurzchalia, and A. Shevchenko. (2007). Top-Down Lipidomic Screens by Multivariate Analysis of High- Resolution Survey Mass Spectra. Anal. Chem. 79: 4083-4093. 9. Züllig, T., M. Trötzmüller, and H. C. Köfeler. (2020). Lipidomics from sample preparation to data analysis: a primer. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 412: 2191-2209. 10. Voinov, V. G., S. E. Bennett, J. S. Beckman, and D. F. Barofsky. (2014). ECD of tyrosine phosphorylation in a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with a radio-frequency-free electromagnetostatic cell. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 25: 1730-1738. 11. Chi, A., C. Huttenhower, L. Y. Geer, J. J. Coon, J. E. Syka, D. L. Bai, J. Shabanowitz, D. J. Burke, O. G. Troyanskaya, and D. F. Hunt. (2007). Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 2193-2198. 12. Wolff, J. J., T. N. Laremore, H. Aslam, R. J. Linhardt, and I. J. Amster. (2008). Electron-induced dissociation of glycosaminoglycan tetrasaccharides. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19: 1449-1458. 13. Porta Siegel, T., K. Ekroos, and S. R. Ellis. (2019). Reshaping Lipid Biochemistry by Pushing Barriers in Structural Lipidomics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58: 6492-6501. 14. Liebisch, G., E. Fahy, J. Aoki, E. A. Dennis, T. Durand, C. S. Ejsing, M. Fedorova, I. Feussner, W. J. Griffiths, H. Kofeler, A. H. Merrill, Jr., R. C. Murphy, V. B. O'Donnell, O. Oskolkova, S. Subramaniam, M. J. O. Wakelam, and F. Spener. (2020). Update on LIPID MAPS classification, nomenclature, and shorthand notation for MS-derived lipid structures. J. Lipid. Res. 61: 1539-1555. 15. Han, X. (2016). Lipidomics for studying metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 12: 668-679. 16. Yang, K., and X. Han. (2016). Lipidomics: techniques, applications, and outcomes related to biomedical sciences. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41: 954-969. 17. Murphy, R. C. 2014. Tandem mass spectrometry of lipids: molecular analysis of complex lipids. Royal Society of Chemistry. 18. Han, X. 2016. Lipidomics: comprehensive mass spectrometry of lipids. John Wiley & Sons. 19. Lorent, J. H., K. R. Levental, L. Ganesan, G. Rivera-Longsworth, E. Sezgin, M. Doktorova, E. Lyman, and I. Levental. (2020). Plasma membranes are asymmetric in lipid unsaturation, packing and protein shape. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16: 644-652. 20. Subbaiah, P. V., D. Sircar, B. Aizezi, and E. Mintzer. (2010). Differential effects of conjugated linoleic acid isomers on the biophysical and biochemical properties of model membranes. BBA- Biomembranes 1798: 506-514. 21. Martinez-Seara, H., T. Róg, M. Pasenkiewicz-Gierula, I. Vattulainen, M. Karttunen, and R. Reigada. (2008). Interplay of unsaturated phospholipids and cholesterol in membranes: effect of the double-bond position. Biophys. J. 95: 3295-3305. 22. Vriens, K., S. Christen, S. Parik, D. Broekaert, K. Yoshinaga, A. Talebi, J. Dehairs, C. Escalona- Noguero, R. Schmieder, T. Cornfield, C. Charlton, L. Romero-Pérez, M. Rossi, G. Rinaldi, M. F. Orth, R. Boon, A. Kerstens, S. Y. Kwan, B. Faubert, A. Méndez-Lucas, C. C. Kopitz, T. Chen, J. Fernandez- Garcia, J. A. G. Duarte, A. A. Schmitz, P. Steigemann, M. Najimi, A. Hägebarth, J. A. Van Ginderachter, E. Sokal, N. Gotoh, K.-K. Wong, C. Verfaillie, R. Derua, S. Munck, M. Yuneva, L. Beretta, R. J. DeBerardinis, J. V. Swinnen, L. Hodson, D. Cassiman, C. Verslype, S. Christian, S. Grünewald, T. G. P. Journal Pre-proof Grünewald, and S.-M. Fendt. (2019). Evidence for an alternative fatty acid desaturation pathway increasing cancer plasticity. Nature 566: 403-406. 23. Lawrence, P., and J. T. Brenna. (2006). Acetonitrile covalent adduct chemical ionization mass spectrometry for double bond localization in non-methylene-interrupted polyene fatty acid methyl esters. Anal. Chem. 78: 1312-1317. 24. Wang, D. H., Z. Wang, J. R. Cortright, K. P. Le, L. Liu, K. S. D. Kothapalli, and J. T. Brenna. (2020). Identification of polymethylene-interrupted polyunsaturated fatty acids (PMI-PUFA) by solvent- mediated covalent adduct chemical ionization triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 92: 8209-8217. 25. Griffiths, W. J. (2003). Tandem mass spectrometry in the study of fatty acids, bile acids, and steroids. Mass Spectrom. Rev. 22: 81-152. 26. Wang, M., R. H. Han, and X. Han. (2013). Fatty acidomics: global analysis of lipid species containing a carboxyl group with a charge-remote fragmentation-assisted approach. Anal. Chem. 85: 9312-9320. 27. Thomas, M. C., T. W. Mitchell, D. G. Harman, J. M. Deeley, J. R. Nealon, and S. J. Blanksby. (2008). Ozone-induced dissociation: elucidation of double bond position within mass-selected lipid ions. Anal. Chem. 80: 303-311. 28. Brown, S. H., T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2011). Analysis of unsaturated lipids by ozone-induced dissociation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1811: 807-817. 29. Marshall, D. L., A. Criscuolo, R. S. E. Young, B. L. J. Poad, M. Zeller, G. E. Reid, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2019). Mapping unsaturation in human plasma lipids by data-independent ozone-induced dissociation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 30: 1621-1630. 30. Poad, B. L., H. T. Pham, M. C. Thomas, J. R. Nealon, J. L. Campbell, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2010). Ozone-induced dissociation on a modified tandem linear ion-trap: observations of different reactivity for isomeric lipids. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21: 1989-1999. 31. Poad, B. L. J., M. R. Green, J. M. Kirk, N. Tomczyk, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2017). High-pressure ozone-induced dissociation for lipid structure elucidation on fast chromatographic timescales. Anal. Chem. 89: 4223-4229. 32. Poad, B. L. J., X. Zheng, T. W. Mitchell, R. D. Smith, E. S. Baker, and S. J. Blanksby. (2018). Online ozonolysis combined with ion mobility-mass spectrometry provides a new platform for lipid isomer analyses. Anal. Chem. 90: 1292-1300. 33. Claes, B. S. R., A. P. Bowman, B. L. J. Poad, R. S. E. Young, R. M. A. Heeren, S. J. Blanksby, and S. R. Ellis. (2021). Mass spectrometry imaging of lipids with isomer resolution using high-pressure ozone-induced dissociation. Anal. Chem. 93: 9826-9834. 34. Williams, P. E., D. R. Klein, S. M. Greer, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2017). Pinpointing double bond and sn-positions in glycerophospholipids via hybrid 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation (UVPD) mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139: 15681-15690. 35. Ryan, E., C. Q. N. Nguyen, C. Shiea, and G. E. Reid. (2017). Detailed structural characterization of sphingolipids via 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation and ultra high resolution tandem mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28: 1406-1419. 36. Buenger, E. W., and G. E. Reid. (2020). Shedding light on isomeric FAHFA lipid structures using 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry. Eur. J. Mass. Spectrom. 26: 311-323. 37. Klein, D. R., M. S. Blevins, L. A. Macias, M. V. Douglass, M. S. Trent, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2020). Localization of double bonds in bacterial glycerophospholipids using 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation in the negative Mode. Anal. Chem. 92: 5986-5993. 38. Macias, L. A., C. L. Feider, L. S. Eberlin, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2019). Hybrid 193 nm Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry Localizes Cardiolipin Unsaturations. Anal. Chem. 91: 12509- 39. Macias, L. A., K. Y. Garza, C. L. Feider, L. S. Eberlin, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2021). Relative quantitation of unsaturated phosphatidylcholines using 193 nm ultraviolet photodissociation parallel reaction monitoring mass spectrometry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143: 14622-14634. Journal Pre-proof 40. Klein, D. R., C. L. Feider, K. Y. Garza, J. Q. Lin, L. S. Eberlin, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2018). Desorption electrospray ionization coupled with ultraviolet photodissociation for characterization of phospholipid isomers in tissue sections. Anal. Chem. 90: 10100-10104. 41. Cody, R. B. B. S. F. (1979). Electron impact excitation of ions from organics: an alternative to collision induced dissociation. Anal. Chem. 51: 547-551. 42. Campbell, J. L., and T. Baba. (2015). Near-complete structural characterization of phosphatidylcholines using electron impact excitation of ions from organics. Anal. Chem. 87: 5837-5845. 43. Jones, J. W., C. J. Thompson, C. L. Carter, and M. A. Kane. (2015). Electron-induced dissociation (EID) for structure characterization of glycerophosphatidylcholine: determination of double- bond positions and localization of acyl chains. J. Mass Spectrom. 50: 1327-1339. 44. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, and P. R. S. Baker. (2016). In-depth sphingomyelin characterization using electron impact excitation of ions from organics and mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 57: 858-867. 45. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, and P. R. S. Baker. (2016). Structural identification of triacylglycerol isomers using electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO). J. Lipid Res. 57: 2015-2027. 46. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, and P. R. S. Baker. (2017). Distinguishing Cis and Trans Isomers in Intact Complex Lipids Using Electron Impact Excitation of Ions from Organics Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89: 7307-7315. 47. Baba, T., J. L. Campbell, J. C. Y. Le Blanc, P. R. S. Baker, and K. Ikeda. (2018). Quantitative structural multiclass lipidomics using differential mobility: electron impact excitation of ions from organics (EIEIO) mass spectrometry. J. Lipid Res. 59: 910-919. 48. Pham, H. T., T. Ly, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2012). Differentiation of complex lipid isomers by radical-directed dissociation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 84: 7525-7532. 49. Narreddula, V. R., B. I. McKinnon, S. J. P. Marlton, D. L. Marshall, N. R. B. Boase, B. L. J. Poad, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2021). Next-generation derivatization reagents optimized for enhanced product ion formation in photodissociation-mass spectrometry of fatty acids. Analyst 146: 156-169. 50. Narreddula, V. R., N. R. Boase, R. Ailuri, D. L. Marshall, B. L. J. Poad, M. J. Kelso, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2019). Introduction of a Fixed-Charge, Photolabile Derivative for Enhanced Structural Elucidation of Fatty Acids. Anal. Chem. 91: 9901-9909. 51. Tomer, K. B., F. W. Crow, and M. L. J. J. o. t. A. C. S. Gross. (1983). Location of double-bond position in unsaturated fatty acids by negative ion MS/MS. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105: 5487-5488. 52. Hsu, F. F., and J. Turk. (1999). Distinction among isomeric unsaturated fatty acids as lithiated adducts by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using low energy collisionally activated dissociation on a triple stage quadrupole instrument. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 10: 600-612. 53. Randolph, C. E., D. J. Foreman, S. K. Betancourt, S. J. Blanksby, and S. A. McLuckey. (2018). Gas-phase ion/ion reactions involving tris-phenanthroline alkaline earth metal complexes as charge inversion reagents for the identification of fatty acids. Anal. Chem. 90: 12861-12869. 54. Randolph, C. E., S. J. Blanksby, and S. A. McLuckey. (2020). Toward complete structure elucidation of glycerophospholipids in the gas phase through charge inversion ion/ion chemistry. Anal. Chem. 92: 1219-1227. 55. Li, P., W. D. Hoffmann, and G. P. Jackson. (2016). Multistage mass spectrometry of phospholipids using collision-induced dissociation (CID) and metastable atom-activated dissociation (MAD). Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 403: 1-7. 56. Takahashi, H., Y. Shimabukuro, D. Asakawa, S. Yamauchi, S. Sekiya, S. Iwamoto, M. Wada, and K. Tanaka. (2018). Structural analysis of phospholipid using hydrogen abstraction dissociation and oxygen attachment dissociation in tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90: 7230-7238. 57. Ma, X., and Y. Xia. (2014). Pinpointing Double Bonds in Lipids by Paternò-Büchi Reactions and Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53: 2592-2596. Journal Pre-proof 58. Ma, X., L. Chong, R. Tian, R. Shi, T. Y. Hu, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2016). Identification and quantitation of lipid C=C location isomers: a shotgun lipidomics approach enabled by photochemical reaction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113: 2573-2578. 59. Zhang, W., D. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. Wu, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2019). Online photochemical derivatization enables comprehensive mass spectrometric analysis of unsaturated phospholipid isomers. Nat. Commun. 10: 79. 60. Zhang, W., B. Shang, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2020). Enhanced Phospholipid isomer analysis by online photochemical derivatization and RPLC-MS. Anal. Chem. 92: 6719-6726. 61. Xia, T., H. Ren, W. Zhang, and Y. Xia. (2020). Lipidome-wide characterization of phosphatidylinositols and phosphatidylglycerols on C=C location level. Anal. Chim. Acta 1128: 107-115. 62. Zhu, Y., W. Wang, and Z. Yang. (2020). Combining Mass Spectrometry with Paternò–Büchi Reaction to Determine Double-Bond Positions in Lipids at the Single-Cell Level. Anal. Chem. 92: 11380- 63. Ma, X., W. Zhang, Z. Li, Y. Xia, and Z. Ouyang. (2021). Enabling high structural specificity to lipidomics by coupling photochemical derivatization with tandem mass spectrometry. Acc. Chem. Res. 54: 3873-3882. 64. Esch, P., and S. Heiles. (2018). Charging and charge switching of unsaturated lipids and apolar compounds using Paternò-Büchi reactions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 29: 1971-1980. 65. Zhao, J., M. Fang, and Y. Xia. (2021). A liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry workflow for in-depth quantitation of fatty acid double bond location isomers. J. Lipid. Res. 62: 100110. 66. Cao, W., S. Cheng, J. Yang, J. Feng, W. Zhang, Z. Li, Q. Chen, Y. Xia, Z. Ouyang, and X. Ma. (2020). Large-scale lipid analysis with C=C location and sn-position isomer resolving power. Nat. Commun. 11: 375. 67. Li, Z., S. Cheng, Q. Lin, W. Cao, J. Yang, M. Zhang, A. Shen, W. Zhang, Y. Xia, X. Ma, and Z. Ouyang. (2021). Single-cell lipidomics with high structural specificity by mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 12: 2869. 68. Su, Y., X. Ma, J. Page, R. Shi, Y. Xia, and Z. Ouyang. (2019). Mapping lipid C=C location isomers in organ tissues by coupling photochemical derivatization and rapid extractive mass spectrometry. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 445. 69. Tang, F., C. Guo, X. Ma, J. Zhang, Y. Su, R. Tian, R. Shi, Y. Xia, X. Wang, and Z. Ouyang. (2018). Rapid in situ profiling of lipid C=C location isomers in tissue using ambient mass spectrometry with photochemical reactions. Anal. Chem. 90: 5612-5619. 70. Bednarik, A., S. Bolsker, J. Soltwisch, and K. Dreisewerd. (2018). An on-tissue Paterno-Buchi reaction for localization of carbon-carbon double bonds in phospholipids and glycolipids by matrix- assisted laser-desorption-ionization mass-spectrometry imaging. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57: 12092-12096. 71. Wäldchen, F., F. Mohr, A. H. Wagner, and S. Heiles. (2020). Multifunctional Reactive MALDI Matrix Enabling High-Lateral Resolution Dual Polarity MS Imaging and Lipid C═C Position-Resolved MS2 Imaging. Anal. Chem. 92: 14130-14138. 72. Zhao, Y., H. Zhao, X. Zhao, J. Jia, Q. Ma, S. Zhang, X. Zhang, H. Chiba, S.-P. Hui, and X. Ma. (2017). Identification and Quantitation of C═C Location Isomers of Unsaturated Fatty Acids by Epoxidation Reaction and Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 89: 10270-10278. 73. Cao, W., X. Ma, Z. Li, X. Zhou, and Z. Ouyang. (2018). Locating carbon–carbon double bonds in unsaturated phospholipids by epoxidation reaction and tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 90: 10286-10292. 74. Tang, S., H. Cheng, and X. Yan. (2020). On‐demand electrochemical epoxidation in nano‐ electrospray ionization mass spectrometry to locate carbon–carbon double bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59: 209-214. 75. Chintalapudi, K., and A. K. Badu-Tawiah. (2020). An integrated electrocatalytic nESI-MS platform for quantification of fatty acid isomers directly from untreated biofluids. Chem. Sci. 11: 9891- Journal Pre-proof 76. Feng, Y., B. Chen, Q. Yu, and L. Li. (2019). Identification of double bond position isomers in unsaturated lipids by m-CPBA epoxidation and mass spectrometry fragmentation. Anal. Chem. 91: 1791- 77. Kuo, T. H., H. H. Chung, H. Y. Chang, C. W. Lin, M. Y. Wang, T. L. Shen, and C. C. Hsu. (2019). Deep lipidomics and molecular imaging of unsaturated lipid isomers: a universal strategy initiated by mCPBA epoxidation. Anal. Chem. 91: 11905-11915. 78. Song, C., D. Gao, S. Li, L. Liu, X. Chen, and Y. Jiang. (2019). Determination and quantification of fatty acid C=C isomers by epoxidation reaction and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1086: 82-89. 79. Bouza, M., Y. Li, C. Wu, H. Guo, Z. L. Wang, and F. M. Fernández. (2020). Large-Area Triboelectric Nanogenerator Mass Spectrometry: Expanded Coverage, Double-Bond Pinpointing, and Supercharging. J. Am. Soc. Mass. Spectrom. 31: 727-734. 80. Swiner, D. J., D. S. Kulyk, H. Osae, G. R. Durisek Iii, and A. K. Badu-Tawiah. (2022). Reactive Thread Spray Mass Spectrometry for Localization of C═C Bonds in Free Fatty Acids: Applications for Obesity Diagnosis. Anal. Chem. 94: 2358-2365. 81. Zhou, Y., H. Park, P. Kim, Y. Jiang, and C. E. Costello. (2014). Surface oxidation under ambient air-not only a fast and economical method to identify double bond positions in unsaturated lipids but also a reminder of proper lipid processing. Anal. Chem. 86: 5697-5705. 82. Girotti, A. W. (1985). Mechanisms of lipid peroxidation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1: 87-95. 83. Unsihuay, D., P. Su, H. Hu, J. Qiu, S. Kuang, Y. Li, X. Sun, S. K. Dey, and J. Laskin. (2021). Imaging and analysis of isomeric unsaturated lipids through online photochemical derivatization of carbon-carbon double bonds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60: 7559-7563. 84. Shindou, H., and T. Shimizu. (2009). Acyl-CoA: lysophospholipid acyltransferases. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 1-5. 85. Shindou, H., D. Hishikawa, T. Harayama, K. Yuki, and T. Shimizu. (2009). Recent progress on acyl CoA: lysophospholipid acyltransferase research. J. Lipid Res. 50: S46-S51. 86. Dennis, E. A., J. Cao, Y. H. Hsu, V. Magrioti, and G. Kokotos. (2011). Phospholipase A2 enzymes: physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention. Chem. Rev. 111: 6130-6185. 87. Inoue, A., and J. Aoki. (2006). Phospholipase A1: structure, distribution and function. Future Lipidol. 1: 687-700. 88. Ekroos, K., C. S. Ejsing, U. Bahr, M. Karas, K. Simons, and A. Shevchenko. (2003). Charting molecular composition of phosphatidylcholines by fatty acid scanning and ion trap MS3 fragmentation. J. Lipid Res. 44: 2181-2192. 89. Vogeser, M., and G. Schelling. (2007). Pitfalls in measuring the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol in biological samples. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 45: 1023-1025. 90. Wang, M., J. Hayakawa, K. Yang, and X. Han. (2014). Characterization and quantification of diacylglycerol species in biological extracts after one-step derivatization: a shotgun lipidomics approach. Anal. Chem. 86: 2146-2155. 91. Yang, K., B. G. Dilthey, and R. W. Gross. (2016). Shotgun lipidomics approach to stabilize the regiospecificity of monoglycerides using a facile low-temperature derivatization enabling their definitive identification and quantitation. Anal. Chem. 88: 9459-9468. 92. Murphy, R., T. Leiker, and M. Robert. (2011). Glycerolipid and cholesterol ester analyses in biological samples by mass spectrometry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1811: 776-783. 93. Herrera, L. C., M. A. Potvin, and J. E. Melanson. (2010). Quantitative analysis of positional isomers of triacylglycerols via electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry of sodiated adducts. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 24: 2745-2752. 94. Hsu, F. F., and J. Turk. (2010). Electrospray ionization multiple-stage linear ion-trap mass spectrometry for structural elucidation of triacylglycerols: assignment of fatty acyl groups on the glycerol backbone and location of double bonds. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 21: 657-669. Journal Pre-proof 95. Hsu, F. F., and J. Turk. (2003). Electrospray ionization/tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric studies on phosphatidylcholines: The fragmentation processes. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 14: 352-363. 96. Pham, H. T., A. T. Maccarone, M. C. Thomas, J. L. Campbell, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2014). Structural characterization of glycerophospholipids by combinations of ozone- and collision-induced dissociation mass spectrometry: the next step towards “top-down” lipidomics. Analyst 139: 204-214. 97. Kirschbaum, C., K. Greis, L. Polewski, S. Gewinner, W. Schollkopf, G. Meijer, G. von Helden, and K. Pagel. (2021). Unveiling glycerolipid fragmentation by cryogenic infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143: 14827-14834. 98. Kozlowski, R. L., T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2015). A rapid ambient ionization-mass spectrometry approach to monitoring the relative abundance of isomeric glycerophospholipids. Sci. Rep. 5: 9243. 99. Marshall, D. L., H. T. Pham, M. Bhujel, J. S. Chin, J. Y. Yew, K. Mori, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2016). Sequential collision-and ozone-induced dissociation enables assignment of relative acyl chain position in triacylglycerols. Anal. Chem. 88: 2685-2692. 100. Zhao, X., W. Zhang, D. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Cao, Q. Chen, Z. Ouyang, and Y. Xia. (2019). A lipidomic workflow capable of resolving sn- and C=C location isomers of phosphatidylcholines. Chem. Sci. 10: 10740-10748. 101. Zhao, X., and Y. Xia. (2021). Characterization of fatty acyl modifications in phosphatidylcholines and lysophosphatidylcholines via radical-directed dissociation. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 32: 560-568. 102. Becher, S., P. Esch, and S. Heiles. (2018). Relative Quantification of Phosphatidylcholine sn- Isomers Using Positive Doubly Charged Lipid–Metal Ion Complexes. Anal. Chem. 90: 11486-11494. 103. Taormina, V. M., A. L. Unger, M. R. Schiksnis, M. Torres-Gonzalez, and J. Kraft. (2020). Branched-chain fatty acids—An underexplored class of dairy-derived fatty acids. Nutrients 12: 2875. 104. Ran-Ressler, R. R., P. Lawrence, and J. T. Brenna. (2012). Structural characterization of saturated branched chain fatty acid methyl esters by collisional dissociation of molecular ions generated by electron ionization. J. Lipid Res. 53: 195-203. 105. Wang, Z., D. H. Wang, H. G. Park, H. J. Tobias, K. S. D. Kothapalli, and J. T. Brenna. (2019). Structural identification of monounsaturated branched chain fatty acid methyl esters by combination of electron ionization and covalent adduct chemical ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91: 15147-15154. 106. Wang, D. H., Z. Wang, and J. T. Brenna. (2020). Gas Chromatography Chemical Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Identification and Straightforward Quantification of Branched Chain Fatty Acids in Foods. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 68: 4973-4980. 107. Wang, Z., H. G. Park, D. H. Wang, R. Kitano, K. S. Kothapalli, and J. T. Brenna. (2020). Fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) but not FADS1 desaturates branched chain and odd chain saturated fatty acids. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1865: 158572. 108. Poger, D., and A. E. Mark. (2015). A ring to rule them all: the effect of cyclopropane fatty acids on the fluidity of lipid bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 119: 5487-5495. 109. Zetzsche, L. E., and A. R. Narayan. (2020). Broadening the scope of biocatalytic C–C bond formation. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4: 334-346. 110. Blevins, M. S., D. R. Klein, and J. S. Brodbelt. (2019). Localization of cyclopropane modifications in bacterial lipids via 213 nm ultraviolet photodissociation mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 91: 6820-6828. 111. Narreddula, V. R., P. Sadowski, N. R. B. Boase, D. L. Marshall, B. L. J. Poad, A. J. Trevitt, T. W. Mitchell, and S. J. Blanksby. (2020). Structural elucidation of hydroxy fatty acids by photodissociation mass spectrometry with photolabile derivatives. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 34: e8741. 112. Zhao, X., G. Wu, W. Zhang, M. Dong, and Y. Xia. (2020). Resolving Modifications on Sphingoid Base and N-Acyl Chain of Sphingomyelin Lipids in Complex Lipid Extracts. Anal. Chem. 92: 14775-14782. Journal Pre-proof 113. Randolph, C. E., D. J. Foreman, S. J. Blanksby, and S. A. McLuckey. (2019). Generating fatty acid profiles in the gas phase: fatty acid identification and relative quantitation using ion/ion charge inversion chemistry. Anal. Chem. 91: 9032-9040. 114. Young, R. S. E., A. P. Bowman, E. D. Williams, K. D. Tousignant, C. L. Bidgood, V. R. Narreddula, R. Gupta, D. L. Marshall, B. L. J. Poad, C. C. Nelson, S. R. Ellis, R. M. A. Heeren, M. C. Sadowski, and S. J. Blanksby. (2021). Apocryphal FADS2 activity promotes fatty acid diversification in cancer. Cell Rep. 34: 108738. 115. Xia, T., M. Yuan, Y. Xu, F. Zhou, K. Yu, and Y. Xia. (2021). Deep Structural Annotation of Glycerolipids by the Charge-Tagging Paterno–Büchi Reaction and Supercritical Fluid Chromatography– Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 93: 8345-8353. 116. Paine, M. R. L., B. L. J. Poad, G. B. Eijkel, D. L. Marshall, S. J. Blanksby, R. M. A. Heeren, and S. R. Ellis. (2018). Mass spectrometry imaging with isomeric resolution enabled by ozone-induced dissociation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57: 10530-10534. 117. Feider, C. L., L. A. Macias, J. S. Brodbelt, and L. S. Eberlin. (2020). Double Bond Characterization of Free Fatty Acids Directly from Biological Tissues by Ultraviolet Photodissociation. Anal. Chem. 92: 8386-8395. 118. Wu, Q., J.-Y. Wang, D.-Q. Han, and Z.-P. Yao. (2020). Recent advances in differentiation of isomers by ion mobility mass spectrometry. TRAC Trends Anal. Chem. 124: 115801. 119. Hinz, C., S. Liggi, and J. L. Griffin. (2018). The potential of Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry for high-throughput and high-resolution lipidomics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 42: 42-50. 120. Kirschbaum, C., E. M. Saied, K. Greis, E. Mucha, S. Gewinner, W. Schöllkopf, G. Meijer, G. von Helden, B. L. J. Poad, S. J. Blanksby, C. Arenz, and K. Pagel. (2020). Resolving Sphingolipid Isomers Using Cryogenic Infrared Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59: 13638-13642. 121. Korf, A., V. Jeck, R. Schmid, P. O. Helmer, and H. Hayen. (2019). Lipid Species Annotation at Double Bond Position Level with Custom Databases by Extension of the MZmine 2 Open-Source Software Package. Anal. Chem. 91: 5098-5105. 122. Wäldchen, F., B. Spengler, and S. Heiles. (2019). Reactive matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging using an intrinsically photoreactive Paterno–Buchi matrix for double-bond localization in isomeric phospholipids. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141: 11816-11820. 123. West, H., and G. E. Reid. (2021). Hybrid 213 nm photodissociation of cationized Sterol lipid ions yield [M]+. Radical products for improved structural characterization using multistage tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 1141: 100-109. Journal Pre-proof Figure Captions Fig. 1. Structural hierarchy of a complex lipid, represented by a phosphatidylethanolamine molecule: PE 16:1(9Z)/20:4(5Z, 8Z, 11Z, 14Z). The “Δ” and “n-” annotations for the locations of C=C are indicated in the structure. The MS/MS methods that have been developed for characterizing at each structural level. *The identified structural levels are named according to Liebisch et al. (14) Fig. 2 The two approaches for locating the C=Cs in lipids by MS. The gas-phase ion activation methods, including OzID, UVPD, CRF, EIEIO, RDD, MAD, etc., initiate fragmentations at or around a C=C. Alternatively, the C=C can be firstly transformed into functional groups that are prone to generating informative fragments in subsequent CID. The transformations can be achieved via the PB reaction, epoxidation, and ΔO -ene reaction. Scheme 1. Gas-phase ion dissociation methods for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) OzID, (b) UVPD, and (c) EIEIO. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. Scheme 2. Double bond specific derivatization methods coupled with subsequent MS/MS for locating C=C(s) in lipids: (a) the PB reaction, (b) epoxidation, and (c) ΔO -ene reaction. The charge of the ions is carried by the headgroup (HG) and not indicated in the schemes. Scheme 3. The MS/MS methods capable of analyzing GPLs and TAGs at the sn-position level. (a) 2 + Formation of a dioxolane-type fragment ion from MS CID of [M + Na] of GPLs. Loss of the sn-2 C𝛼 -H 2/3 is the exclusive pathway involved in the phospho-headgroup loss (-HOE) from MS CID of protonated or metal adduct of GPLs. The dioxolane-type fragment ion contains a C=C newly formed between the first two carbons of the sn-2 acyl chain. For TAGs, the C𝛼 -H can be lost from any of the three sn-positions and thus four structures of dioxolane-type fragment ions are formed if the three chains have different masses. 3 3 3 (b) MS CID-OzID, (c) MS CID-UVPD, and (d) 2-acpy PB coupled with MS CID for analysis of sn- isomer of GLPs. Journal Pre-proof Scheme 4. (a) Formation of the sn-specific fragment ions from EIEIO of TAG ([M +Na] ). The doublet with 2 Da mass difference is a signature for sn-1 or sn-3 fragments while sn-2 fragment appears as a singlet. (b) Formation of the sn-2 fragment from EIEIO of GPL ([M + H] ). (c) Formation of the sn-1 fragment via 2 - from MS CID of PC or LPC ([M + HCO ] ). Fig. 3. Schematics for isomer quantitation by isomer-resolving MS/MS: (a) forming diagnostic fragment ions for each isomer (A and B) by MS/MS and (b) constructing a calibration curve and obtaining molar fraction of each isomer if the synthetic standards are available for different biological samples (S1 and S2). If synthetic standards are not available, “relative fractional quantitation” is achieved from measuring the abundance ratios of the diagnostic ions (I /I ). A B Fig. 4. a) Heatmap of the C=C location isomers of GPLs in treated LNCaP cells relative to untreated cells (114), showing that SCD-1-related lipids (the n-7 and n-9 isomers) and FADS2-related lipids (the n-10 isomers) have inversed abundance shifts due to silencing of SCD1 and FADS2, respectively. (Reprinted with permission (114). Copyright 2021 Elsevier). b) Alterations in the relative amounts of the C=C location isomers of PC 34:2 in MDA-MB-468 single cells upon SCD1 inhibition (67) and c) significant decrease of the C16:1(n-7) and C18:1(n-7) isomers of PC 34:2. (Reprinted with permission (67). Copyright 2021 Springer Nature). d) Synthetic pathways of different C=C location isomers of monounsaturated FAs in human cells (modified from (114)). Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Journal Pre-proof Table 1. A list of MS/MS approaches for characterization of complex lipids at the levels of C=C location and sn-position. Structure MS approach Lipids Samples Reference information Shotgun PB-MS/MS FA and GPL lipid extracts (58) LC-PB-MS/MS FA and GPL lipid extracts, plasma samples, (59-61, 65) GPL and MALDI-PB-MS/MS mouse brain tissue, (70, 122) glycosphingolipid, PC, cardiolipin, E. coli and human papillary thyroid (35, 36, 38, UVPD-MS FA, sphingolipid, carcinoma extracts 123) SM, TG LC-UVPD-MS FA and GPL bovine liver and porcine brain extracts (49, 63) DESI-UVPD-MS PC brain tissue, lymph node tissue (40) C=C OzID-MS GPL, SM, TG lipid extracts (27, 31) locations LC-OzID-MS PC, PE, SM human plasma (32) bovine liver extract, human plasma, (63, 72, 73, epoxidation-MS/MS FA and GPL yeast extract, serum samples 76) epoxidation-LC- FA and GPL human serum (76) MS/MS epoxidation-DESI- human serum, mouse adipocytes, and FA and GPL (76) MS/MS cancer tissue sections epoxidation-MALDI- FA cancer tissue samples, human cell lines (63) MS/MS HAD/OAD- MS/MS PC and LPC standards (56) + 3 (+Na ) PB-MS GPL human breast cancer cells (66) + 3 (+Na ) OzID-MS GPL cow brain and kidney extracts, (96, 98) + 3 (+Na ) UVPD-MS GP bovine liver and porcine brain extracts (34) sn- positions - 3 (+HCO ) PB-MS PC tissue samples of human breast cancer (100) 2+ 3 (+Fe ) UVPD-MS PC lipid extracts of mouse pancreas tissue (102) EIEIO PC egg yolk extracts (42) Journal Pre-proof

Journal

Journal of Lipid ResearchAmerican Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Published: Apr 27, 2022

Keywords: lipidomics; tandem mass spectrometry; lipid isomers; double bond location; sn-position; glycerolipids; glycerophospholipids; branched-chain fatty acids; liquid chromatography; phenotyping

There are no references for this article.