Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Meredith, R. Millsap (1992)
On the misuse of manifest variables in the detection of measurement biasPsychometrika, 57
G. Mellenbergh (1982)
Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item BiasJournal of Educational Statistics, 7
R. Nandakumar
Shealy-Stout's test for DIF. Journal of Educational Measurement.
T. Ackerman (1992)
Ackerman, T. (1992, April).Assessing construct validity using multidimensional item response theory. Paper presented at the 1992 AERA/NCME joint meeting, San Francisco, CA.
R. Shealy, W. Stout (1991)
A Procedure to Detect Item Bias Present Simultaneously in Several Items
R. Shealy (1989)
An item response theory-based statistical procedure for detecting concurrent internal bias in ability tests
R. Nandakumar (1993)
Simultaneous DIF Amplification and Cancellation: Shealy-Stout's Test for DIFJournal of Educational Measurement, 30
H. Swaminanthan (1985)
Item response theory: Principles and applications
G. J. Mellenbergh (1982)
Contingency table methods for assessing item biasJournal of Educational Statistics, 7
N. Dorans, Edward Kulick (1986)
Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test.Journal of Educational Measurement, 23
H. Swaminathan, H. Rogers (1990)
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression ProceduresJournal of Educational Measurement, 27
Gary Lautenschiager, Dong-Gun Park (1988)
IRT Item Bias Detection Procedures: Issues of Model Misspecification, Robustness, and Parameter LinkingApplied Psychological Measurement, 12
T. Ansley, R. Forsyth (1985)
An Examination of the Characteristics of Unidimensional IRT Parameter Estimates Derived From Two-Dimensional DataApplied Psychological Measurement, 9
R. T. Shealy (1989)
.An item response theory-based statistical procedure for detecting concurrent internal bias in ability tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
R. D. Bock (1984)
Item operating characteristics of the Armed Services Aptitude Battery (ASVAB). Form 8A
F. Kok (1988)
Item Bias and Test Multidimensionality
R. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan (1984)
Item Response TheoryThe History of Educational Measurement
C. Fraser (1983)
NOHARM II, A Fortran program for fitting unidimensional and multi-dimensional normal ogive models of latent trait theory
L. Roussos (1993)
Simulation studies of effects of small sample size and studied item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenzel Type 1 error performance
M. D. Reckase (1992)
A brief review. Paper presented at the 1992 NCME Meeting
W. F. Stout (1993)
An item response theory model for test bias and differential test functioning
F. Lord (1980)
Applications of Item Response Theory To Practical Testing Problems
R. Zwick (1990)
When Do Item Response Function and Mantel-Haenszel Definitions of Differential Item Functioning Coincide?Journal of Educational Statistics, 15
N. J. Dorans (1992)
November)
R. Shealy, W. Stout (1991)
An Item Response Theory Model for Test Bias.
W. Stout (1987)
A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionalityPsychometrika, 52
P. Holland, Dorothy Thayer (1986)
DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING AND THE MANTEL‐HAENSZEL PROCEDUREETS Research Report Series, 1986
F. Drasgow (1987)
A study of measurement bias of two standard psychological testsJournal of Applied Psychology, 72
F. Drasgow (1987)
Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72
R. Linn, Michael LeVine, C. Hastings, James Wardrop (1981)
Item Bias in a Test of Reading ComprehensionApplied Psychological Measurement, 5
N. S. Raju (1992)
Raju, N. S., van der Linden, W. J., & Fleer, P. J. (1992, April).An IRT-based internal measure of test bias with applications for differential item functioning. Paper presented at the 1992 AERA meeting, San Francisco, CA.
M. Tatsuoka, F. Lord, M. Novick, A. Birnbaum (1971)
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66
Terry Ackerman (1992)
Assessing Construct Validity Using Multidimensional Item Response Theory.
R. Hambleton, H. Rogers (1989)
Detecting potentially biased test items : Comparison of IRT area and Mantel-Haenszel methodsApplied Measurement in Education, 2
H. Wainer (1993)
Model-based standardized measurement of an item's differential impact
R. E. Millsap (1989)
Why there is no free lunch. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society
Terry Ackerman (1992)
A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity from a Multidimensional PerspectiveJournal of Educational Measurement, 29
Abstract A model-based modification (SIBTEST) of the standardization index based upon a multidimensional IRT bias modeling approach is presented that detects and estimates DIF or item bias simultaneously for several items. A distinction between DIF and bias is proposed. SIBTEST detects bias/DIF without the usual Type 1 error inflation due to group target ability differences. In simulations, SIBTEST performs comparably to Mantel-Haenszel for the one item case. SIBTEST investigates bias/DIF for several items at the test score level (multiple item DIF called differential test functioning: DTF), thereby allowing the study of test bias/DIF, in particular bias/DIF amplification or cancellation and the cognitive bases for bias/DIF.
Psychometrika – Cambridge University Press
Published: Jun 1, 1993
Keywords: Psychometrics; Assessment, Testing and Evaluation; Statistics for Social Sciences, Humanities, Law; Statistical Theory and Methods
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.