Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/polygraph-testimony-and-juror-judgments-a-comparison-of-the-guilty-f00JVks0xw
References (24)
-
Lykken Lykken (1959)
The GSR in the detection of deceptionJournal of Applied Psychology, 43
-
N. Spaños, S. DuBreuil, M. Gwynn (1991)
The Effects of Expert Testimony concerning Rape on the Verdicts and Beliefs of Mock JurorsImagination, Cognition and Personality, 11
-
T. Bashore, P. Rapp (1993)
Are there alternatives to traditional polygraph proceduresPsychological Bulletin, 113
-
D. Lykken (1959)
The GSR in the detection of guilt.Journal of Applied Psychology, 43
-
A. Cavoukian, R. Heslegrave (1980)
The admissibility of polygraph evidence in courtLaw and Human Behavior, 4
-
MacCoun MacCoun, Kerr Kerr (1988)
Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors' bias for leniencyJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54
-
Honts Honts, Perry Perry (1992)
Polygraph admissibility: Changes and challengesLaw and Human Behavior, 16
-
Mueller (1995)
Federal Rules of Evidence -
N. Spaños, Bryan Myers, S. DuBreuil, A. Pawlak (1992)
The Effects of Polygraph Evidence and Eyewitness Testimony on the Beliefs and Decisions of Mock JurorsImagination, Cognition and Personality, 12
-
G. Wells (1992)
Naked Statistical Evidence of Liability: Is Subjective Probability Enough?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62
-
David Faigman (1995)
The evidentiary status of social science under Daubert : Is it "scientific," "technical," or "other" knowledge?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 1
-
N. Pennington, R. Hastie (1992)
Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62
-
Koffler Koffler (1957)
The lie detector–A critical appraisal of the technique as a potential undermining factor in the judicial processNew York Law Forum, 123
-
G. Wells (1993)
What do we know about eyewitness identification?The American psychologist, 48 5
-
M. Burt (1980)
Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of personality and social psychology, 38 2
-
A. Markwart (1983)
The effect of polygraph evidence on mock jury decision-making. -
Cavoukian Cavoukian, Heselgrave Heselgrave (1980)
The admissibility of polygraph evidence in court: Some empirical findingsLaw and Human Behavior, 4
-
C. Honts, Mary Perry (1992)
Polygraph admissibilityLaw and Human Behavior, 16
-
Carlson Carlson, Pasano Pasano, Jannuzzo Jannuzzo (1977)
The effect of lie detector evidence on jury deliberations: An empirical studyJournal of Police Science and Administration, 5
-
Saxe Saxe, Dougherty Dougherty, Cross Cross (1985)
The validity of polygraph tests: Scientific analysis and public policyAmerican Psychologist, 40
-
C. Patrick, W. Iacono (1989)
Psychopathy, Threat, and Polygraph Test AccuracyJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
-
P. Giannelli (1980)
The Admissibility of Novel Scientific Evidence: Frye v. United States, a Half-Century LaterColumbia Law Review, 80
-
W. Alexander (1975)
NEW MATERIALS CREATED FROM WASTE -
D. Lykken (1998)
A Tremor In The Blood
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1997 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
- ISSN
- 0021-9029
- eISSN
- 1559-1816
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01606.x
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
The present experiment investigated the impact of the Control Question Test (CQT) and the Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) on the verdicts of mock jurors. Although studies have indicated that polygraph evidence has little influence on jurors' verdicts (Cavoukian & Heselgrave, 1980; Spanos, Myers, Dubreuil, & Pawlak, 1992–1993), no research has previously distinguished between the different types of polygraph tests and their impact on juror verdicts. In the present study, jurors were shown a videotape of a simulated rape‐murder trial that contained either CQT polygraph evidence, GKT polygraph evidence, or no polygraph evidence. No differences were found among the 3 conditions for either jury verdicts or individual juror verdicts, and jurors tended to rate both forms of polygraph testimony below other forms of equally suspect evidence, such as eyewitness testimony, in its influence on their decision‐making process.
Journal
Journal of Applied Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 1997