Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Callaway Callaway (1995)
Positive interactions among plantsBotanical Review, 61
J. Connolly, P. Wayne, F. Bazzaz (2001)
Interspecific Competition in Plants: How Well Do Current Methods Answer Fundamental Questions?The American Naturalist, 157
J. Grime (1973)
Competitive Exclusion in Herbaceous VegetationNature, 242
R. Callaway, L. Walker (1997)
Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communitiesEcology, 78
Benjamin Smith, J. Wilson (1996)
A consumer's guide to evenness indicesOikos, 76
James Coleman, K. McConnaughay, D. Ackerly (1994)
Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants.Trends in ecology & evolution, 9 5
Brent Smith (1983)
Demography of Floerkea proserpinacoides, a forest-floor annual. III: Dynamics of seed and seedling populationsJournal of Ecology, 71
T. White (2001)
Opposing paradigms: regulation or limitation of populations?Oikos, 93
L. Adler, K. Wikler, F. Wyndham, C. Linder, J. Schmitt (1993)
Potential for Persistence of Genes Escaped from Canola: Germination Cues in Crop, Wild, and Crop-Wild Hybrid Brassica rapaFunctional Ecology, 7
Author Grime (1977)
Evidence for the Existence of Three Primary Strategies in Plants and Its Relevance to Ecological and Evolutionary TheoryThe American Naturalist, 111
Goldberg Goldberg, Turkington Turkington, Olsvig‐Whittaker Olsvig‐Whittaker (1995)
Quantifying the community‐level consequences of competitionFolia Geobotanica Phytotax, 30
A. Dyer, A. Fenech, K. Rice (2000)
Accelerated seedling emergence in interspecific competitive neighbourhoodsEcology Letters, 3
M. Holmgren, M. Scheffer, M. Huston (1997)
The interplay of facilitation and competition in plant communitiesEcology, 78
(1996)
A consumer ’ s guide to evenness index
R. Callaway (1998)
Are positive interactions species-specific ?Oikos, 82
D. Goldberg, T. Rajaniemi, J. Gurevitch, A. Stewart‐Oaten (1999)
EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO QUANTIFYING INTERACTION INTENSITY: COMPETITION AND FACILITATION ALONG PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENTSEcology, 80
S. Waite, M. Hutchings (1978)
THE EFFECTS OF SOWING DENSITY, SALINITY AND SUBSTRATE UPON THE GERMINATION OF SEEDS OF PLANTAGO CORONOPUS L.New Phytologist, 81
Brent Smith (1983)
DEMOGRAPHY OF FLOERKEA PROSERPINACOIDES, A FOREST-FLOOR ANNUAL I. DENSITY-DEPENDENT GROWTH AND MORTALITYJournal of Ecology, 71
K. Tielbörger, R. Kadmon (2000)
TEMPORAL ENVIRONMENTAL VARIATION TIPS THE BALANCE BETWEEN FACILITATION AND INTERFERENCE IN DESERT PLANTSEcology, 81
I. Palmblad (1968)
Competition in Experimental Populations of Weeds with Emphasis on the Regulation of Population SizeEcology, 49
(1998)
Are positive interactions
D. Goldberg, R. Turkington, L. Olsvig‐Whittaker, A. Dyer (2001)
Density dependence in an annual plant community: variation among life history stagesEcological Monographs, 71
D. Goldberg, Andrew Barton (1992)
Patterns and Consequences of Interspecific Competition in Natural Communities: A Review of Field Experiments with PlantsThe American Naturalist, 139
Dyer R., Goldberg E., Turkington R., Sayre C. (2001)
Effects of growing conditions and source habitat on plant traits and functional group definitionFunctional Ecology, 15
M. Austin (1989)
Plant strategies and the dynamics and structure of plant communitiesTrends in Ecology and Evolution, 4
M. Bertness, R. Callaway (1994)
Positive interactions in communities.Trends in ecology & evolution, 9 5
E. Newman (1973)
Competition and Diversity in Herbaceous VegetationNature, 244
D. Goldberg, G. Estabrook (1998)
Separating the effects of number of individuals sampled and competition on species diversity: an experimental and analytic approachJournal of Ecology, 86
B. Murray (1998)
Density‐dependent germination and the role of seed leachateAustral Ecology, 23
(1992)
Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities: field experiments with plants
(1989)
Modeling the evolutionary ecology of seedbanks
A. Novoplansky, D. Goldberg (2001)
Effects of water pulsing on individual performance and competitive hierarchies in plantsJournal of Vegetation Science, 12
D. Venable (1989)
CHAPTER 5 – Modeling the Evolutionary Ecology of Seed Banks
R. Kadmon (1995)
Plant Competition along Soil Moisture Gradients: A Field Experiment with the Desert Annual Stipa CapensisJournal of Ecology, 83
(1996)
A consumer’s guide to evenness
B. Murray (1994)
On density dependenceOikos, 69
N. Fowler (1986)
Density-dependent population regulation in a Texas grasslandEcology, 67
(1971)
Chemical interaction between seeds of common plants
D. Gibson, J. Connolly, D. Hartnett, J. Weidenhamer (1999)
Designs for greenhouse studies of interactions between plantsJournal of Ecology, 87
Y. Linhart (1976)
Density-dependent seed germination strategies in colonizing versus non-colonizing plant species.Journal of Ecology, 64
J. Grace (1995)
On the Measurement of Plant Competition IntensityEcology, 76
Summary 1 Few experiments directly test the role of density dependence in natural plant communities. 2 We tested (i) whether different initial seed densities of the entire seed bank of an annual plant community affected performance (emergence, mean plant biomass and survival) and (ii) whether density‐dependent processes were operating within the communities. We also tested whether life‐stage, year and soil moisture (both on a topographic gradient and in an experimental manipulation) influenced the effects of seed density. 3 We considered two distinct phases: seed to emergent seedlings, and emergent seedlings to established plants. 4 The seed bank was collected from a semistabilized sand dune in the Negev Desert, Israel. This was added to sieved sand in plots at the same site at four different initial seed densities: 1/16×, 1/4×, 1× (natural seed density) and 2×. The experiment was repeated for three consecutive growing seasons. 5 Emergence of seedlings was significantly influenced by initial seed density in all 3 years, with higher initial seed densities having lower rates of emergence. 6 Mean final plant size was negatively density dependent and consistently unaffected by the initial seed density sown. 7 In general, there were no strong interactions of topographic position with initial seed density, processes within the vegetation were not density dependent and the experimental addition of water did not influence any of the performance measures tested. Density‐dependent processes vary from year to year, while moisture effects do not. 8 We conclude that seedling emergence and some processes in the established plant community are density dependent, but the established plant community is also affected by other processes, such as resource limitation.
Journal of Ecology – Wiley
Published: Jun 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.