Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An Archaeological Indicator of Matrilocal versus Patrilocal Residence

An Archaeological Indicator of Matrilocal versus Patrilocal Residence <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The growing willingness among archaeologists to draw inferences about cultural behavior is offset by the almost total lack of research that shows how ethnographic and archaeological phenomena are correlated. If ethnologists and archaeologists are to do complementary research on the same problems of cultural process and variation, we must try to explore, systematically and comparatively, how the behavioral and material realms may be correlated. The present paper offers an example of such research. I describe the design and results of a cross-cultural study that suggests an archaeological indicator of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Briefly, it appears from 2 separate random samples of ethnographically described societies that matrilocal versus patrilocal residence can be simply and accurately predicted from the living floor area of the average house in the society.</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Antiquity CrossRef

An Archaeological Indicator of Matrilocal versus Patrilocal Residence

American Antiquity , Volume 38 (2): 177-182 – Apr 1, 1973

An Archaeological Indicator of Matrilocal versus Patrilocal Residence


Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The growing willingness among archaeologists to draw inferences about cultural behavior is offset by the almost total lack of research that shows how ethnographic and archaeological phenomena are correlated. If ethnologists and archaeologists are to do complementary research on the same problems of cultural process and variation, we must try to explore, systematically and comparatively, how the behavioral and material realms may be correlated. The present paper offers an example of such research. I describe the design and results of a cross-cultural study that suggests an archaeological indicator of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Briefly, it appears from 2 separate random samples of ethnographically described societies that matrilocal versus patrilocal residence can be simply and accurately predicted from the living floor area of the average house in the society.</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/an-archaeological-indicator-of-matrilocal-versus-patrilocal-residence-fHOlLOnGyJ

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0002-7316
DOI
10.2307/279363
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The growing willingness among archaeologists to draw inferences about cultural behavior is offset by the almost total lack of research that shows how ethnographic and archaeological phenomena are correlated. If ethnologists and archaeologists are to do complementary research on the same problems of cultural process and variation, we must try to explore, systematically and comparatively, how the behavioral and material realms may be correlated. The present paper offers an example of such research. I describe the design and results of a cross-cultural study that suggests an archaeological indicator of matrilocal versus patrilocal residence. Briefly, it appears from 2 separate random samples of ethnographically described societies that matrilocal versus patrilocal residence can be simply and accurately predicted from the living floor area of the average house in the society.</jats:p>

Journal

American AntiquityCrossRef

Published: Apr 1, 1973

There are no references for this article.