Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Testing DSM-5 in routine clinical practice settings: feasibility and clinical utility.

Testing DSM-5 in routine clinical practice settings: feasibility and clinical utility. This article describes the clinical utility and feasibility of proposed DSM-5 criteria and measures as tested in the DSM-5 Field Trials in Routine Clinical Practice Settings (RCP). METHODS RCP data were collected online for six months (October 2011 to March 2012). Participants included psychiatrists, licensed clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, advanced practice psychiatric-mental health nurses, licensed counselors, and licensed marriage and family therapists. Clinicians received staged, online training and enrolled at least one patient. Patients completed self-assessments of cross-cutting symptom domains, disability measures, and an evaluation of these measures. Clinicians conducted diagnostic interviews and completed DSM-5 and related assessments and a clinical utility questionnaire. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) Pubmed

Testing DSM-5 in routine clinical practice settings: feasibility and clinical utility.

Mościcki, Eve K; Clarke, Diana E; Kuramoto, S Janet; Kraemer, Helena C; Narrow, William E; Kupfer, David J; Regier, Darrel A
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) , Volume 64 (10): 9 – Jun 23, 2014
Download PDF

Testing DSM-5 in routine clinical practice settings: feasibility and clinical utility.


Abstract

This article describes the clinical utility and feasibility of proposed DSM-5 criteria and measures as tested in the DSM-5 Field Trials in Routine Clinical Practice Settings (RCP). METHODS RCP data were collected online for six months (October 2011 to March 2012). Participants included psychiatrists, licensed clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, advanced practice psychiatric-mental health nurses, licensed counselors, and licensed marriage and family therapists. Clinicians received staged, online training and enrolled at least one patient. Patients completed self-assessments of cross-cutting symptom domains, disability measures, and an evaluation of these measures. Clinicians conducted diagnostic interviews and completed DSM-5 and related assessments and a clinical utility questionnaire.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/testing-dsm-5-in-routine-clinical-practice-settings-feasibility-and-fcdBC1UQT7

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
1075-2730
DOI
10.1176/appi.ps.201300098
pmid
23852272

Abstract

This article describes the clinical utility and feasibility of proposed DSM-5 criteria and measures as tested in the DSM-5 Field Trials in Routine Clinical Practice Settings (RCP). METHODS RCP data were collected online for six months (October 2011 to March 2012). Participants included psychiatrists, licensed clinical psychologists, clinical social workers, advanced practice psychiatric-mental health nurses, licensed counselors, and licensed marriage and family therapists. Clinicians received staged, online training and enrolled at least one patient. Patients completed self-assessments of cross-cutting symptom domains, disability measures, and an evaluation of these measures. Clinicians conducted diagnostic interviews and completed DSM-5 and related assessments and a clinical utility questionnaire.

Journal

Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) – Pubmed

Published: Jun 23, 2014

There are no references for this article.