J. Price, S. Droege, A. Price (1995)
The Summer Atlas of North American Birds
W. Severinghaus (1981)
Guild theory development as a mechanism for assessing environmental impactEnvironmental Management, 5
(1981)
Limitation in small habitat islands: chance or competition?
P. Angermeier, J. Karr (1994)
Biological Integrity versus Biological Diversity as Policy DirectivesProtecting biotic resourcesBioScience, 44
M. Willson (1974)
Avian Community Organization and Habitat StructureEcology, 55
(1995)
Landscape-level management of migratory birds: looking past the trees to see the forest
T. Martin (1995)
Avian Life History Evolution in Relation to Nest Sites, Nest Predation, and FoodEcological Monographs, 65
(1958)
Georgia birds
T. Lewis, B. Conkling (1994)
Forest health monitoring: Southeast loblolly/shortleaf pine demonstration interim report
R. Sharitz, L. Boring, D. Lear, J. Pinder (1992)
Integrating Ecological Concepts with Natural Resource Management of Southern Forests.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2 3
(1980)
Geographic variation in the avifaunas of tropical forest undergrowth
D. Finch (1991)
Population ecology, habitat requirements, and conservation of neotropical migratory birds, 205
J. Verner (1984)
The guild concept applied to management of bird populationsEnvironmental Management, 8
M. Morrison (1986)
Bird Populations as Indicators of Environmental Change
(1978)
Bird communities associated with succession and management of loblolly-shortleaf pine forests. Pages 50–65 in R. M. DeGraaf, editor. Management of southern forests for nongame birds
(1995)
Influences on the effectiveness of fixed-radius point counts in forests. Pages 49-56 in
J. Karr (1991)
Biological Integrity: A Long-Neglected Aspect of Water Resource Management.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 1 1
Mary Croonquist, R. Brooks (1991)
Use of avian and mammalian guilds as indicators of cumulative impacts in riparian-wetland areasEnvironmental Management, 15
(1992)
Forest monitoring 1992 activities plan. EPA/602/R-93/002
D. Johnston, E. Odum (1956)
Breeding Bird Populations in Relation to Plant Succession on the Piedmont of GeorgiaEcology, 37
(1987)
Birds as indicators of forest stand condition in boreal forests of eastern Canada The value of birds
W. Block, D. Finch, L. Brennan (1995)
Single-species versus multiple-species approaches for management
(1947)
South Carolina birdlife
T. Martin, Pingjun Li (1992)
Life History Traits of Open- vs. Cavity-Nesting BirdsEcology, 73
(1987)
Sugar maple forest decline and implications for forest insects and birds
R. Mannan (1984)
Bird populations and vegetation characteristics in managed and old-growth forests, northeastern Oregon.Journal of Wildlife Management, 48
(2000)
Regional Monitoring of Bird Communities Canterbury et al. Conservation Biology
C. Robbins, D. Dawson, B. Dowell (1989)
Habitat area requirements of breeding forest birds of the middle Atlantic states, 103
R. Root (1967)
The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray GnatcatcherEcological Monographs, 37
C. Palmer, K. Ritters, T. Strickland, D. Cassell, G. Byers (1992)
Monitoring and research strategy for forests - environmental monitoring and assessment program
Code of Federal Regulations. 1985. National Forest system land and resource management planning. 36 CFR Chapter II 219
(1995)
Ecology and management of Neotropical migratory birds: a review and synthesis of critical issues
Temple Temple, Wiens Wiens (1989)
Bird populations and environmental changes: can birds be bio‐indicators?American Birds, 43
F. James, R. Johnston, Noel Wamer, G. Niemi, W. Boecklen (1984)
The Grinnellian Niche of the Wood ThrushThe American Naturalist, 124
J. Karr, Philip Yant, K. Fausch, I. Schlosser (1987)
Spatial and Temporal Variability of the Index of Biotic Integrity in Three Midwestern StreamsTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 116
R. Mannan, M. Morrison, E. Meslow (1984)
The use of guilds in forest bird management.Wildlife Society Bulletin, 12
(1989)
Birds as a tool in environmental monitoring
(1982)
Bird habitat relationships on southeastern forest lands. General technical report SE-GTR-22
T. Martin (1993)
Nest Predation and Nest SitesNew perspectives on old patternsBioScience, 43
D. Bradford, S. Franson, A. Neale, D. Heggem, Glen Miller, G. Canterbury (1998)
Bird Species Assemblages as Indicators of Biological Integrity in Great Basin RangelandEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 49
P. Ehrlich (1988)
The Birder's Handbook
R. Szaro (1986)
Guild management: an evaluation of avian guilds as a predictive toolEnvironmental Management, 10
P. Landres, J. Verner, J. Thomas (1988)
Ecological Uses of Vertebrate Indicator Species: A CritiqueConservation Biology, 2
Angermeier Angermeier, Karr Karr (1994)
Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives.BioScience, 44
J. Karr (1981)
Assessment of Biotic Integrity Using Fish CommunitiesFisheries, 6
Abstract: Ecological indicators for long‐term monitoring programs are needed to detect and assess changing environmental conditions. We developed and tested community‐level environmental indicators for monitoring forest bird populations and associated habitat. We surveyed 197 sampling plots in loblolly–shortleaf pine forests, spanning an area from Georgia to Virginia ( U.S.A.) and representing a gradient in levels of anthropogenic disturbance. Ninety of these plots were randomly selected from a sampling grid, permitting quantitative assessment of cumulative distribution functions for bird community and habitat parameters. Species were independently classified into habitat assemblages indicating birds typical of disturbed habitat (e.g., shrubland, forest edge) and undisturbed habitat (mature forest). Relative abundances of these assemblages were used to form a bird community index—similar to the index of biotic integrity applied to aquatic systems—showing the effects of habitat disturbance on forest bird communities. Bird communities on the majority of the sample area (52–75%, 90% confidence interval) were dominated by disturbance‐tolerant species. Sites dominated by mature‐forest species were comparatively uncommon. Habitat assemblages appeared to be particularly useful tools for environmental monitoring; individual species abundance was positively correlated with assemblage species richness, and assemblage members showed consistent responses to variations in disturbance level. To a lesser extent, component species of nesting guilds showed this pattern of cohesive responses, but those of foraging guilds did not. We also developed a habitat index based on habitat variables that predicted bird community index values. Habitat and bird community indices were strongly correlated in an independent validation dataset, suggesting that the habitat index can provide a reliable predictor of bird community status. The two indices may be used in combination, with the bird community index providing a direct measure of the status of the bird community and the habitat index providing a basis on which to separate changes in the bird community into local habitat effects versus other factors (e.g., landscape level effects, changes on wintering grounds).
Conservation Biology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.