Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses.

DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected... The DSM-5 Field Trials were designed to obtain precise (standard error,0.1) estimates of the intraclass kappa asa measure of the degree to which two clinicians could independently agree on the presence or absence of selected DSM-5 diagnoses when the same patient was interviewed on separate occasions, in clinical settings, and evaluated with usual clinical interview methods. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The American journal of psychiatry Pubmed

DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses.

The American journal of psychiatry , Volume 170 (1): 12 – Feb 19, 2013

DSM-5 field trials in the United States and Canada, Part II: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses.


Abstract

The DSM-5 Field Trials were designed to obtain precise (standard error,0.1) estimates of the intraclass kappa asa measure of the degree to which two clinicians could independently agree on the presence or absence of selected DSM-5 diagnoses when the same patient was interviewed on separate occasions, in clinical settings, and evaluated with usual clinical interview methods.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/dsm-5-field-trials-in-the-united-states-and-canada-part-ii-test-retest-hB2wIN3sFD

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0002-953X
DOI
10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070999
pmid
23111466

Abstract

The DSM-5 Field Trials were designed to obtain precise (standard error,0.1) estimates of the intraclass kappa asa measure of the degree to which two clinicians could independently agree on the presence or absence of selected DSM-5 diagnoses when the same patient was interviewed on separate occasions, in clinical settings, and evaluated with usual clinical interview methods.

Journal

The American journal of psychiatryPubmed

Published: Feb 19, 2013

There are no references for this article.