Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Murdock (1981)
Atlas of World Cultures
G. Williams (2018)
Adaptation and Natural Selection
J. Hartung (1982)
Polygyny and Inheritance of Wealth
D. Brooks, P. Price (1981)
Evolutionary biology of parasites.Monographs in population biology, 15
R. Levins (1968)
Evolution in Changing Environments
G. Williams (1975)
Sex and evolution.Monographs in population biology, 8
D. White, M. Burton (1988)
Causes of polygyny: ecology economy kinship and warfare.American Anthropologist, 90
D. White (1988)
Rethinking Polygyny: Co-Wives, Codes, and Cultural Systems [and Comments and Reply]Current Anthropology, 29
J. Hartung (1983)
In Defense of Murdock: A Reply to DickemannCurrent Anthropology, 24
B. Low (1988)
Measures of Polygyny in HumansCurrent Anthropology, 29
Cedric Smith, D. Falconer (1962)
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.Biometrika, 49
Abstract Pathogen stress is an important form of environmental extremeness and uncertainty for humans as well as other organisms. It is predicted to: fl] increase the degree of polygyny (as fewer males become appropriate mates); [2] make non-sororal polygyny more frequent (as variable offspring become more advantageous), and [3] be correlated with signs of sexual selection: physical dimorphism, societal rules about allowed wives for men in different categories, both achieved and inherited. The first two hypotheses are supported. As pathogen stress increases, the degree of polygyny increases, no matter how polygyny is measured. As pathogen stress increases, non-sororal polygyny and capture of women from outside societies increase; sororal and other endogamous forms of polygyny decrease. The third hypothesis is not supported. Measures of male-male competition and reflections of male status are not associated with pathogen stress. A man's actual present appearance (physical, behavioral) may provide a more direct and accurate reflection of a man's worth as a mate. It is possible that the measures available for testing here are not fully appropriate. These results suggest that major pathogens may have been, during human evolutionary history, an important selective force, shifting the polygyny threshold, and resulting in greater polygyny, and polygyny of specific types, in areas of high stress. The relationship appears to be of a threshold sort (at high levels of pathogen stress monogamy, polyandry, and mild polygyny are absent) rather than a linear relationship. We need within-society data for appropriate pathogens regarding relationship between individual pathogen load and probability of getting a mate, possible interactions between pathogen stress and resource accumulation in sexual selection, and impact of pathogen load on fertility. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes 1Symposium on Parasites and Sexual Selection presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Zoologists, 27–30 December 1988, at San Francisco, California. © 1990 by the American Society of Zoologists
Integrative and Comparative Biology – Oxford University Press
Published: May 1, 1990
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.