F. Filion (1975)
ESTIMATING BIAS DUE TO NONRESPONSE IN MAIL SURVEYSPublic Opinion Quarterly, 39
E. Cox, W. Anderson, David Fulcher (1974)
Reappraising Mail Survey Response RatesJournal of Marketing Research, 11
J. Armstrong (1975)
Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys
J. Clausen, R. Ford (1947)
Controlling Bias in Mail QuestionnairesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 42
J. Anderson, D. Berdie (1975)
Effects on response rates of formal and informal questionnaire follow-up techniques.Journal of Applied Psychology, 60
Donald Longworth (1953)
Use of a Mail QuestionnaireAmerican Sociological Review, 18
Donald Bren, E. Tchetgen (2022)
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral SciencesThe SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design
M. Matteson (1974)
Type of transmittal letter and questionnaire color as two variables influencing response rates in a mail survey.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59
D. Byrkit (1975)
Elements of statistics: An introduction to probability and statistical inference
(1973)
Mail questionnaire response induction: the effect of four variables on the response of a random sample to a difficult questionnaire
K. Hopkins, James Podolak (1983)
Class-of-Mail and the Effects of Monetary Gratuity on the Response Rates of Mailed Questionnaires.Journal of Experimental Education, 51
J. Horowitz, W. Sedlacek (1974)
Initial returns on mail questionnaires: A literature review and research noteResearch in Higher Education, 2
C. Holmes, P. Erdos (1971)
Professional Mail Surveys.Applied statistics, 20
A. Trice, Walter Layman (1984)
Hotel Ratings: III. Method of Return and Return RatePsychological Reports, 54
David Labrecque (1978)
A Response Rate Experiment Using Mail QuestionnairesJournal of Marketing, 42
W. Blumenfeld (1973)
Effect of Appearance of Correspondence on Response Rate to a Mail Questionnaire SurveyPsychological Reports, 32
Mary Kawash, L. Aleamoni (1971)
Effect of Personal Signature on the Initial Rate of Return of a Mailed Questionnaire.Journal of Applied Psychology, 55
W. Weilbacher, H. Walsh (1952)
Mail Questionnaires and the Personalized Letter of TransmittalJournal of Marketing, 16
Andrew Kimball (1961)
Increasing the Rate of Return in Mail SurveysJournal of Marketing, 25
L. Adams, D. Gale (1982)
Solving the quandary between questionnaire length and response rate in educational researchResearch in Higher Education, 17
James Harris, Hugh Guffey (1978)
Questionnaire Returns: Stamps versus Business Reply Envelopes RevisitedJournal of Marketing Research, 15
K. Mccrohan, L. Lowe (1981)
A Cost/benefit Approach to Postage used on Mail QuestionnairesJournal of Marketing, 45
R. Butler (1973)
Effects of signed and unsigned questionnaires for both sensitive and nonsensitive items.Journal of Applied Psychology, 57
D. Dillman, J. Frey (1974)
Contribution of personalization to mail questionnaire response as an element of a previously tested method.Journal of Applied Psychology, 59
P. Erdos, A. Morgan (1983)
Professional Mail Surveys
Alan Andreasen (1970)
PERSONALIZING MAIL QUESTIONNAIRE CORRESPONDENCEPublic Opinion Quarterly, 34
Bruce Walker, R. Burdick (1977)
Advance Correspondence and Error in Mail SurveysJournal of Marketing Research, 14
M. Houston, Robert Jefferson (1975)
The Negative Effects of Personalization on Response Patterns in Mail SurveysJournal of Marketing Research, 12
G. Roeher (1963)
EFFECTIVE TECHNIQUES IN INCREASING RESPONSE TO MAILED QUESTIONNAIRESPublic Opinion Quarterly, 27
(1981)
An investigation of respondent anonymity's effect on mailed questionnaire response rate and quality
J. Armstrong, Terry Overton (1977)
Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail SurveysJournal of Marketing Research, 14
C. Moore (1941)
Increasing the Returns from QuestionnairesJournal of Educational Research, 35
R. Parsons, Thomas Medford (1972)
THE EFFECT OF ADVANCE NOTICE IN MAIL SURVEYS OF HOMOGENEOUS GROUPSPublic Opinion Quarterly, 36
G. Frazier, Kermit. Bird (1958)
Increasing the Response of a Mail QuestionnaireJournal of Marketing, 23
E. Carpenter (1974)
Personalizing Mail SurveysA Replication and ReassessmentPublic Opinion Quarterly, 38
S. Michael (1971)
Handbook in research and evaluation
Charles Futrell, C. Lamb (1981)
Effect on Mail Survey Return Rates of Including Questionnaires with Follow-up LettersPerceptual and Motor Skills, 52
Nonresponse is a serious threat to validity in mail surveys, prompting the need for research on techniques for increasing response rates. The relative effectiveness of personalized versus form covering letters in obtaining responses in a mail questionnaire survey was investigated for both initial and follow-up mailings. A questionnaire eliciting opinions about content in college courses in measurement was sent to 1000 Utah school teachers, randomly divided into two groups, with 500 receiving personalized letters and 500 receiving form letters. Nonrespondents in each group were randomly divided, with half receiving personalized follow-up letters and half receiving form follow-up letters. Using nondirectional hypothesis tests, no statistically significant differences were found in the relative effectiveness of personalized or form letters in either initial or follow-up mailings. These findings do not support the widely held belief that personalized covering letters improve response rates.
Psychological Reports – SAGE
Published: Aug 31, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.