Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Unidimensional (global) vs. multidimensional composite performance appraisals of store managers

Unidimensional (global) vs. multidimensional composite performance appraisals of store managers Abstract This study attempts to demonstrate: 1) that weighting performance dimensions produces evaluations very similar to the unweighted approach; 2) that “unidimensional” or “global” assessment based on employees' overall value to the firm produces results similar to the multidimensional approach. Both propositions were supported by the data employed in this study, providing encouragement to organizations using the simpler and less expensive “global” evaluations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Springer Journals

Unidimensional (global) vs. multidimensional composite performance appraisals of store managers

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/unidimensional-global-vs-multidimensional-composite-performance-j2omyzCBHo

References (13)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
1981 Academy of Marketing Science
ISSN
0092-0703
eISSN
1552-7824
DOI
10.1007/BF02721983
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract This study attempts to demonstrate: 1) that weighting performance dimensions produces evaluations very similar to the unweighted approach; 2) that “unidimensional” or “global” assessment based on employees' overall value to the firm produces results similar to the multidimensional approach. Both propositions were supported by the data employed in this study, providing encouragement to organizations using the simpler and less expensive “global” evaluations.

Journal

Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 1981

There are no references for this article.