Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Spiro (1965)
A Typology of Social Structure and the Patterning of Social Institutions: A Cross-Cultural StudyAmerican Anthropologist, 67
(1970)
Applied factor analysis, Evanston
A. Haddon (1932)
The Evolution of CultureNature, 129
R. Benfer (1972)
Factor Analysis as Numerical Induction: How to Judge a Book by its Cover1American Anthropologist, 74
R. Sellars, L. White (1949)
The science of culture
R. Naroll (1964)
A Fifth Solution to Galton's Problem1American Anthropologist, 66
H. Driver, K. Schuessler (1967)
Correlational Analysis of Murdocks 1957 Ethnographic Sample1American Anthropologist, 69
R. Rummel (1970)
Applied Factor Analysis
(1967)
Correlational analysis of Murdock's 1957 ethnographic sample
(1970)
1970a "A settlement pattern scale of cultural complexity,
A. Goldberger, H. Blalock (1972)
Causal Models in the Social Sciences.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67
Charles Mcnett (1970)
A Cross-Cultural Method for Predicting Nonmaterial Traits in ArcheologyCross-Cultural Research, 5
R. Beardsley, P. Holder, A. Krieger, B. Meggers, J. Rinaldo, P. Kutschi (1955)
Functional and Evolutionary Implications of Community PatterningAmerican Antiquity, 22
(1966)
Introduction to statistics for comparative research
J. Sawyer, R. Levine (1966)
Cultural Dimensions: A Factor Analysis of the World Ethnographic Sample1American Anthropologist, 68
(1970)
A settlement pattern scale of cultural complexity
Factor analysis (principal components) with both orthogonal and oblique rotations was applied to gamma coefficients derived from thecross-cultural data used to develop a settlement pattern scale of cultural complexity. Varying numbers of factors were rotated, using bothmethods, and it was concluded that the results confirmed the systematicrelationships reported earlier. However, the missing data were somewhat of a problem, and the analysis was repeated with estimated missingvalues for an augmented set of traits, using both phi and gamma coefficients and oblique rotation only. Phi gave a clearer picture, with the samemajor factors-politics, economics, and religion. In addition, a functionalrelationship between monogamy, bilateral kinship, and absence of slaveryappeared. The other variables were essentially restricted to their ownspecific factors. Higher order factor analysis was then used to groupthe initial factors at a second and third level. [Cultural Evolution, Cross-cultural Analysis, Factor Analysis, Comparative Methodology]
Behavior Science Notes – SAGE
Published: Aug 1, 1973
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.