R. Stillman, R. Caldow, J. Goss‐Custard, M. Alexander (2000)
Individual variation in intake rate: the relative importance of foraging efficiency and dominanceJournal of Animal Ecology, 69
R. Mansour, R. Lipcius (1991)
Density-dependent foraging and mutual interference in blue crabs preying upon infaunal clamsMarine Ecology Progress Series, 72
W. Sutherland (1983)
Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distributionJournal of Animal Ecology, 52
N. Holmgren (1995)
The ideal free distribution of unequal competitors: predictions from a behaviour-based functional responseJournal of Animal Ecology, 64
W. Cresswell (1997)
Interference competition at low competitor densities in blackbirds Turdus merulaJournal of Animal Ecology, 66
A. Moody, A. Houston (1995)
Interference and the ideal free distributionAnimal Behaviour, 49
James Smith (1974)
The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European Thrushes. Ii: the Adaptiveness of the Search PatternsBehaviour, 49
J. Meer, B. Ens (1997)
Models of interference and their consequences for the spatial distribution of ideal and free predatorsJournal of Animal Ecology, 66
G. Ruxton (1995)
Short Term Refuge Use and Stability of Predator-Prey ModelsTheoretical Population Biology, 47
G. Vines (1980)
Spatial consequences of aggressive behaviour in flocks of oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus L.Animal Behaviour, 28
(1997)
Individual behaviour, populations and conservation
M. Pienkowski (1983)
Changes in the foraging pattern of plovers in relation to environmental factorsAnimal Behaviour, 31
J. Goss‐Custard, R. Clarke, S. Durell (1984)
Rates of food intake and aggression of oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus on the most and least preferred mussel Mytilus edulis beds of the exe estuaryJournal of Animal Ecology, 53
M. Whitehouse, Y. Lubin (1999)
Competitive foraging in the social spider Stegodyphus dumicolaAnimal Behaviour, 58
R. Stillman, W. Sutherland (1990)
The optimal search path in a patchy environmentJournal of Theoretical Biology, 145
(1996)
Feeding with other Oystercatchers
J. Goss‐Custard (2015)
Competition for Food and Interference among Waders, 55
K. Norris, I. Johnstone (1998)
Interference competition and the functional response of oystercatchers searching for cockles by touchAnimal Behaviour, 56
Geoff Parker, William Sutherland (1986)
Ideal free distributions when individuals differ in competitive ability: phenotype-limited ideal free modelsAnimal Behaviour, 34
W. Cresswell (1998)
Variation in the strength of interference competition with resource density in blackbirds, Turdus merulaOikos, 81
M. Yates, R. Stillman, J. Goss‐Custard (2000)
Contrasting interference functions and foraging dispersion in two species of shorebird (Charadrii)Journal of Animal Ecology, 69
James Smith (1974)
The Food Searching Behaviour of Two European ThrushesBehaviour, 48
J. Goss‐Custard, P. Rothery (1976)
A method for measuring some components of foraging of certain birds in the fieldAnimal Behaviour, 24
R. Stillman, J. Goss‐Custard, R. Caldow (1997)
Modelling interference from basic foraging behaviourJournal of Animal Ecology, 66
(1970)
Feeding dispersion in some overwintering wading birds. In: Social behaviour in birds and mammals (Crook JH, ed)
P. Triplet, R. Stillman, J. Goss‐Custard (1999)
Prey abundance and the strength of interference in a foraging shorebirdJournal of Animal Ecology, 68
J. Selman, J. Goss‐Custard (1988)
Interference between foraging redshank Tringa totanusAnimal Behaviour, 36
Luis Bautista-Sopelana, J. Alonso, J. Alonso (1998)
Foraging site displacement in common crane flocksAnimal Behaviour, 56
R. Stillman, J. Goss‐Custard, R. Clarke, S. Durell (1996)
Shape of the interference function in a foraging vertebrateJournal of Animal Ecology, 65
B. Ens, J. Goss‐Custard (1984)
Interference Among Oystercatchers, Haematopus ostralegus, Feeding on Mussels, Mytilus edulis, on the Exe EstuaryJournal of Animal Ecology, 53
G. Ruxton, W. Gurney, A. Roos (1992)
Interference and Generation CyclesTheoretical Population Biology, 42
We develop a model of predators foraging within a single patch, on prey that become temporarily immune to predation (depressed) after detecting a predator. Interference through prey depression occurs because the proportion of vulnerable prey (and hence intake rate) decreases as predator density increases. Predators in our model are not forced to move randomly within the patch, as is the case in other similar models, but can avoid areas of depressed prey and so preferentially forage over vulnerable prey. We compare the extent to which different avoidance rules (e.g., move more quickly over depressed prey or turn if approaching depressed prey) influence the amount of time spent foraging over depressed and vulnerable prey, and how this influences the strength of interference. Although based on a different mechanism, our model produces two similar general predictions to interference models based on direct interactions between predators: the strength of interference increases with (1) increased competitor density and (2) decreased prey encounter rate. This suggests that there are underlying similarities in the nature of interference even when it arises through different processes. Not surprisingly, avoidance of depressed prey can substantially reduce the strength of interference compared with random foraging. However, we identify the region of the model's parameter space in which this reduction is particularly large and show that the only system for which suitable data are available, redshank Tringa totanus feeding on Corophium volutator , falls within this region. The model shows that, by adjusting its search path to avoid areas of depressed prey, a predator can substantially reduce the amount of the interference it experiences and that this applies over a wide range of parameter space, including the region occupied by a real system. This suggests that behavior-based interference models should consider predator search pattern if they are to accurately predict the strength of the interference. Key words
Behavioral Ecology – Oxford University Press
Published: Nov 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.