Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Analysing instrument mixes in quality assurance: the Czech and Slovak Accreditation Commissions in the era of mass higher education

Analysing instrument mixes in quality assurance: the Czech and Slovak Accreditation Commissions... Utilising insights from policy instrument theory, the article analyses the design, functioning and effects of the tools used by the Czech Accreditation Commission (CAC) and the Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC) in the 2000s. Aside from programme accreditation, the other tools analysed are: institutional approval, institutional evaluations, evaluations of accredited activities and complex accreditations. Czech and Slovak programme accreditation is empirically evidenced to be very burdensome and have limited effectiveness. The commissions’ evaluative activities reveal some inconsistency of recommendations and missing follow-ups. Overall, the analysis suggests that the spillover effects of on-site evaluations on accreditation verdicts are likely to limit long-term improvement intra-institutionally, causing inconsistency of the instrument mix applied by the CAC and the SAC. Due to these design discrepancies, the change-over from programme accreditation to quality audit, resulting in an approval-audit mix, is argued for as a viable development trajectory of Czech and Slovak systemic quality assurance. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Quality in Higher Education Taylor & Francis

Analysing instrument mixes in quality assurance: the Czech and Slovak Accreditation Commissions in the era of mass higher education

Quality in Higher Education , Volume 20 (1): 20 – Jan 2, 2014
20 pages

 
/lp/taylor-francis/analysing-instrument-mixes-in-quality-assurance-the-czech-and-slovak-kJuvsYpuDd

References (79)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2014 Taylor & Francis
ISSN
1470-1081
eISSN
1353-8322
DOI
10.1080/13538322.2014.890773
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Utilising insights from policy instrument theory, the article analyses the design, functioning and effects of the tools used by the Czech Accreditation Commission (CAC) and the Slovak Accreditation Commission (SAC) in the 2000s. Aside from programme accreditation, the other tools analysed are: institutional approval, institutional evaluations, evaluations of accredited activities and complex accreditations. Czech and Slovak programme accreditation is empirically evidenced to be very burdensome and have limited effectiveness. The commissions’ evaluative activities reveal some inconsistency of recommendations and missing follow-ups. Overall, the analysis suggests that the spillover effects of on-site evaluations on accreditation verdicts are likely to limit long-term improvement intra-institutionally, causing inconsistency of the instrument mix applied by the CAC and the SAC. Due to these design discrepancies, the change-over from programme accreditation to quality audit, resulting in an approval-audit mix, is argued for as a viable development trajectory of Czech and Slovak systemic quality assurance.

Journal

Quality in Higher EducationTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2014

Keywords: instrument mix; accreditation; quality assurance; policy implementation

There are no references for this article.