S. Hong, B. Han, Seung Lee, S. Kim, K. Min, S. Jeong, Hyeon Jeong, S. Byun, H. Lee, G. Choe, Sang Lee (2009)
Prediction of Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancers diagnosed via multi (≥12)-core prostate biopsyWorld Journal of Urology, 27
D. Colleselli, J. Bektic, M. Mitterberger, G. Schaefer, O. Dalpiaz, G. Bartsch, W. Horninger, Alexandre Pelzer (2008)
Upgrading of Gleason score 6 prostate cancers on biopsy after prostatectomy in the low and intermediate tPSA rangeProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 13
C. King, D. Patel, M. Terris (2005)
Prostate Biopsy Volume Indices do not Predict for Significant Gleason UpgradingAmerican Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28
A. Moussa, M. Kattan, R. Berglund, Changhong Yu, K. Fareed, J. Jones (2010)
A nomogram for predicting upgrading in patients with low‐ and intermediate‐grade prostate cancer in the era of extended prostate samplingBJU International, 105
J. Epstein, W. Allsbrook, M. Amin, L. Egevad (2005)
The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic CarcinomaThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 29
E. Ruijter, G. Leenders, G. Miller, F. Debruyne, C. Kaa (2000)
Errors in histological grading by prostatic needle biopsy specimens: frequency and predisposing factorsThe Journal of Pathology, 192
L. Richstone, F. Bianco, Hiral Shah, M. Kattan, J. Eastham, P. Scardino, D. Scherr (2008)
Radical prostatectomy in men aged ≥70 years: effect of age on upgrading, upstaging, and the accuracy of a preoperative nomogramBJU International, 101
Moon (2010)
Predictive factors of Gleason score upgrading in localized and locally advanced prostate cancer diagnosed by prostate biopsyKorean J Urol, 51
R. Turley, M. Terris, C. Kane, W. Aronson, J. Presti, C. Amling, S. Freedland (2008)
The association between prostate size and Gleason score upgrading depends on the number of biopsy cores obtained: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital DatabaseBJU International, 102
L. Budäus, M. Graefen, G. Salomon, H. Isbarn, G. Lughezzani, M. Sun, F. Chun, T. Schlomm, T. Steuber, A. Haese*, J. Koellermann, G. Sauter, M. Fisch, H. Heinzer, H. Huland, P. Karakiewicz (2010)
The novel nomogram of Gleason sum upgrade: Possible application for the eligible criteria of low dose rate brachytherapyInternational Journal of Urology, 17
O. Gofrit, K. Zorn, J. Taxy, Shang Lin, G. Zagaja, G. Steinberg, A. Shalhav (2007)
Predicting the risk of patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 to harbor a higher grade cancer.The Journal of urology, 178 5
Amin (2011)
Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy: relation of primary pattern 3 or 4 to pathological stage and progression after radical prostatectomyJ Urol, 286
H. Visapää, K. Hotakainen, Johan Lundin, M. Ala-opas, U. Stenman (2010)
The Proportion of Free PSA and Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Score after Radical ProstatectomyUrologia Internationalis, 84
K. Kuroiwa, T. Shiraishi, S. Naito (2011)
Gleason score correlation between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens and prediction of high-grade Gleason patterns: significance of central pathologic review.Urology, 77 2
S. Chandrakanth (2012)
Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer on Needle Biopsy: Relation of Primary Pattern 3 or 4 to Pathological Stage and Progression After Radical ProstatectomyYearbook of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2012
P. Turker, E. Baş, S. Bozkurt, B. Günlüsoy, A. Sezgin, H. Postacı, L. Turkeri (2013)
Presence of high grade tertiary Gleason pattern upgrades the Gleason sum score and is inversely associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival.Urologic oncology, 31 1
A. Moussa, Jianbo Li, Meghan Soriano, E. Klein, Fei Dong, J. Jones (2009)
Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancerBJU International, 103
www.kjurology.org DOI:10.4111/kju.2010.51.10.677 Urological Oncology Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
J. Davies, Monty Aghazadeh, S. Phillips, S. Salem, Sam Chang, P. Clark, Michael Cookson, Rodney Davis, S. Herrell, D. Penson, J. Smith, D. Barocas (2011)
Prostate size as a predictor of Gleason score upgrading in patients with low risk prostate cancer.The Journal of urology, 186 6
Katia Leite, L. Câmara-Lopes, M. Dall'oglio, J. Cury, A. Antunes, A. Sañudo, M. Srougi (2009)
Upgrading the Gleason score in extended prostate biopsy: implications for treatment choice.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 73 2
N. Corcoran, C. Hovens, Matthew Hong, J. Pedersen, R. Casey, S. Connolly, J. Peters, L. Harewood, M. Gleave, S. Goldenberg, A. Costello (2012)
Underestimation of Gleason score at prostate biopsy reflects sampling error in lower volume tumoursBJU International, 109
Faye Serkin, D. Soderdahl, J. Cullen, Yongmei Chen, J. Hernández (2010)
Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.Urologic oncology, 28 3
K. Stav, Sandbank Judith, Herbert Merald, D. Leibovici, A. Lindner, A. Zisman (2007)
Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?Urologic oncology, 25 5
S. Freedland, C. Kane, C. Amling, W. Aronson, M. Terris, J. Presti (2006)
Upgrading and downgrading of prostate needle biopsy specimens: risk factors and clinical implications.Urology, 69 3
A. Magheli, S. Hinz, Claudia Hege, C. Stephan, K. Jung, K. Miller, M. Lein (2010)
Prostate specific antigen density to predict prostate cancer upgrading in a contemporary radical prostatectomy series: a single center experience.The Journal of urology, 183 1
B. Trock, C. Guo, M. Gonzalgo, A. Magheli, S. Loeb, J. Epstein (2009)
Tertiary Gleason patterns and biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: proposal for a modified Gleason scoring system.The Journal of urology, 182 4
M. Kojima, P. Troncoso, R. Babaian (1995)
Use of prostate-specific antigen and tumor volume in predicting needle biopsy grading error.Urology, 45 5
S. Fine, J. Epstein (2008)
A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.The Journal of urology, 179 4
L. Krane, M. Menon, S. Kaul, S. Siddiqui, C. Wambi, J. Peabody, P. Agarwal (2011)
Role of PSA velocity in predicting pathologic upgrade for Gleason 6 prostate cancer.Urologic oncology, 29 4
T. Imamoto, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, T. Utsumi, M. Takano, T. Suyama, K. Kawamura, N. Kamiya, Y. Naya, T. Ueda, T. Ichikawa (2010)
External validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of prostate cancer Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology among Japanese patients.Urology, 76 2
U. Capitanio, P. Karakiewicz, L. Valiquette, P. Perrotte, C. Jeldres, A. Briganti, A. Gallina, N. Suardi, A. Cestari, G. Guazzoni, A. Salonia, F. Montorsi (2009)
Biopsy core number represents one of foremost predictors of clinically significant gleason sum upgrading in patients with low-risk prostate cancer.Urology, 73 5
European Urology – Unpaywall
Published: Feb 8, 2012
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.