Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Reckase, Terry Ackerman, J. Carlson (1988)
Building a Unidimensional Test Using Multidimensional ItemsJournal of Educational Measurement, 25
R. Shealy, W. Stout (1991)
A Procedure to Detect Item Bias Present Simultaneously in Several Items
L. Shepard, Gregory Camilli, David Williams (1985)
VALIDITY OF APPROXIMATION TECHNIQUES FOR DETECTING ITEM BIASJournal of Educational Measurement, 22
M. Reckase (1985)
The Difficulty of Test Items That Measure More Than One AbilityApplied Psychological Measurement, 9
M. Stenbeck, R. Hambleton, H. Swaminathan, H. Rogers (1991)
Fundamentals of Item Response Theory
William Strout (1990)
A new item response theory modeling approach with applications to unidimensionality assessment and ability estimationPsychometrika, 55
W. Yen (1985)
Increasing item complexity: A possible cause of scale shrinkage for unidimensional item response theoryPsychometrika, 50
R. Nandakumar (1991)
Traditional Dimensionality Versus Essential DimensionalityJournal of Educational Measurement, 28
G. Marco (1977)
Item characteristic curve solutions to three intractable testing problems.Journal of Educational Measurement, 14
(1990)
Iterative linking and ability scale purification as means for improving IRT
(1983)
A priori considerations in choos
Two-stage estimation of item bias
M. Reckase (1979)
Unifactor Latent Trait Models Applied to Multifactor Tests: Results and ImplicationsJournal of Educational Statistics, 4
M. Miller, Robert Linn (1988)
Invariance of Item Characteristic Functions With Variations in Instructional CoverageJournal of Educational Measurement, 25
R. Mislevy, R. Bock (1990)
BILOG 3 : item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models
(1989)
The effect of multidimensionality
M. Reckase, R. Mckinley (1991)
The Discriminating Power of Items That Measure More Than One DimensionApplied Psychological Measurement, 15
(1990)
The SAS system for personal computers: Release 6. 04
R. Linn, F. Drasgow (1987)
Implications of the Golden Rule Settlement for Test ConstructionEducational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 6
(1986)
April). Fitting a unidimensional model to
T. Oshima, M. Miller (1990)
Multidimensionality and IRT-Based Item Invariance Indexes: The Effect of Between-Group Variation in Trait CorrelationJournal of Educational Measurement, 27
R. Shealy, W. Stout (1991)
An Item Response Theory Model for Test Bias.
W. Stout (1987)
A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionalityPsychometrika, 52
F. Drasgow (1987)
Study of the measurement bias of two standardized psychological tests.Journal of Applied Psychology, 72
David Harrison (1986)
Robustness of Irt Parameter Estimation to Violations of The Unidimensionality AssumptionJournal of Educational Statistics, 11
Dong-Gun Park, G. Lautenschlager (1990)
Improving IRT Item Bias Detection With Iterative Linking and Ability Scale PurificationApplied Psychological Measurement, 14
(1991)
DIMTEST [Computer program
(1991)
SIBTEST manual
(1975)
December). A critical analysis
Terry Ackerman (1992)
A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity from a Multidimensional PerspectiveJournal of Educational Measurement, 29
This paper demonstrates empirically how item bias indexes based on item response theory (IRT) identify bias that results from multidimensionality. When a test is multidimensional (MD) with a primary trait and a nuisance trait that affects a small portion of the test, item bias is defined as a mean difference on the nuisance trait between two groups. Results from a simulation study showed that although IRT-based bias indexes clearly distinguished multidimensionality from item bias, even with the presence of a between-group dif ference on the primary trait, the bias detection rate depended on the degree to which the item measured the nuisance trait, the values of MD discrimination, and the number of MD items. It was speculated that bias defined from the MD perspective was more likely to be detected when the test data met the essential unidimensionality assumption. Index
Applied Psychological Measurement – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 1992
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.