Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R Lai G-C Li (2014)
Disambiguation and co-authorship networks of the US patent inventor database (1975–2010)Research Policy, 43
J Shotton A Criminisi (2012)
Decision forests: A unified framework for classification, regression, density estimation, manifold learning and semi-supervised learningFoundations and Trends in Computer Graphics and Vision, 7
Y Xue E Durham (2012)
Quantifying the correctness, computational complexity, and security of privacy-preserving string comparators for record linkageInformation Fusion, 13
SJ Stolfo MA Hernandez (1995)
The merge/purge problem for large databasesACM Sigmod Record, 24
MA Gonçalves AF Santana (2015)
On the combination of domain-specific heuristics for author name disambiguation: The nearest cluster methodInternational Journal on Digital Libraries, 16
H. Han (2004)
. Two supervised learning approaches for name disambiguation in author citations.Digital Libraries
VI Torvik NR Smalheiser (2009)
Author name disambiguationAnnual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43
S Gillani M Imran (2013)
A real-time heuristic-based unsupervised method for name disambiguation in digital librariesD-Lib Magazine, 19
D Zhao A Strotmann (2009)
Author name disambiguation for collaboration network analysis and visualizationProceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 46
V Torra J Domingo-Ferrer (2003)
Disclosure risk assessment in statistical microdata protection via advanced record linkageStatistics and Computing, 13
A-L Barabási R Albert (2002)
Statistical mechanics of complex networksReviews of Modern Physics, 74
ME Newman (2004)
Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaborationProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101
E Horlings T Gurney (2011)
Author disambiguation using multi-aspect similarity indicatorsScientometrics, 91
N Torelli (2006)
Metodi statistici per l’integrazione di dati da fonti diverse
V Fuccella D Stefano (2013)
The use of different data sources in the analysis of co-authorship networks and scientific performanceSocial Networks, 35
M Weeber VI Torvik (2005)
A probabilistic similarity metric for medline records: A model for author name disambiguationJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56
R Mooney M Bilenko (2003)
Adaptive name matching in information integrationIEEE Intelligent Systems, 5
S Robertson (2004)
Understanding inverse document frequency: On theoretical arguments for IDFJournal of Documentation, 60
X. Dong (2005)
. Reference reconciliation in complex information spaces.Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data
S-H Na I-S Kang (2009)
On co-authorship for author disambiguationInformation Processing and Management, 45
J-C Lamirel P Cuxac (2013)
Efficient supervised and semi-supervised approaches for affiliations disambiguationScientometrics, 97
AA Ferreira AP Carvalho (2011)
Incremental unsupervised name disambiguation in cleaned digital librariesJournal of Information and Data Management, 2
P. Christen (2008)
. Febrl: An open source data cleaning, deduplication and record linkage system with a graphical user interface.Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
D. Lee (2005)
. Effective and scalable solutions for mixed and split citation problems in digital libraries.Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Information quality in information systems
AA Ferreira RG Cota (2010)
An unsupervised heuristic-based hierarchical method for name disambiguation in bibliographic citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61
J Moody (2004)
The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999American Sociological Review, 69
S. Yan (2007)
. Adaptive sorted neighborhood methods for efficient record linkage.Proceedings of the 7th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on digital libraries (pp
AB Sunter IP Fellegi (1969)
A theory for record linkageJournal of the American Statistical Association, 64
R Nugent SL Ventura (2015)
Seeing the non-stars: (Some) sources of bias in past disambiguation approaches and a new public tool leveraging labeled recordsResearch Policy, 44
D Hicks (1999)
The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequencesScientometrics, 44
M. Sadinle (2011)
. Approaches to multiple record linkage.Proceedings of International Statistical Institute (Vol
S Zaccarin D De Stefano (2016)
Co-authorship networks and scientific performance: An empirical analysis using the generalized extreme value distributionJournal of Applied Statistics, 43
H. Han (2005)
. Name disambiguation in author citations using a k-way spectral clustering method.Digital Libraries
AA Ferreira A Veloso (2012)
Cost-effective on-demand associative author name disambiguationInformation Processing and Management, 48
X-H Ding J Wu (2013)
Author name disambiguation in scientific collaboration and mobility casesScientometrics, 96
S Milojević (2013)
Accuracy of simple, initials-based methods for author name disambiguationJournal of Informetrics, 7
MA Gonçalves AA Ferreira (2012)
A brief survey of automatic methods for author name disambiguationACM Sigmod Record, 41
R. Baxter (2003)
. A comparison of fast blocking methods for record linkage.ACM KDD Workshops (Vol
MJ Leij S Goyal (2006)
Economics: An emerging small worldJournal of Political Economy, 114
B Li H Wu (2014)
Unsupervised author disambiguation using Dempster–Shafer theoryScientometrics, 101
P Christen (2012)
A survey of indexing techniques for scalable record linkage and deduplicationIEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 24
Abstract The aim of the present contribution is to merge bibliographic data for members of a bounded scientific community in order to derive a complete unified archive, with top-international and nationally oriented production, as a new basis to carry out network analysis on a unified co-authorship network. A two-step procedure is used to deal with the identification of duplicate records and the author name disambiguation. Specifically, for the second step we strongly drew inspiration from a well-established unsupervised disambiguation method proposed in the literature following a network-based approach and requiring a restricted set of record attributes. Evidences from Italian academic statisticians were provided by merging data from three bibliographic archives. Non-negligible differences were observed in network results in the comparison of disambiguated and not disambiguated data sets, especially in network measures at individual level.
SIGGRAPH 2015: Studio – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 1, 2016
Keywords: Information Storage and Retrieval; Library Science
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.