Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Conceptual Structure and Social Functions of Behavior Explanations: Beyond Person–Situation Attributions

Conceptual Structure and Social Functions of Behavior Explanations: Beyond Person–Situation... The traditionalapproach to studying behavior explanations involves treating them as eitherperson causes or situation causes and assessing them byusing rating scales. An analysis of people’s free-response behavior explanationsreveals, however, that the conceptual distinctions people use in their explanations aremore complex and sophisticated than the person–situation dichotomy suggests. Theauthors, therefore, introduce a model of the conceptual structure of folk behaviorexplanations (the network of concepts and assumptions on which explanations are based) andtest it in 4 studies. The modes and features of behavior explanations within thisconceptual structure also have specific social functions. In 2 additional studies, theauthors demonstrate that people alter distinct features of their explanations whenpursuing particular impression-management goals and that listeners make inferences aboutexplainers’ goals on the basis of these features. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Personality and Social Psychology American Psychological Association

Conceptual Structure and Social Functions of Behavior Explanations: Beyond Person–Situation Attributions

 
/lp/american-psychological-association/conceptual-structure-and-social-functions-of-behavior-explanations-kiVLhRa1d1

References (63)

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0022-3514
eISSN
1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.79.3.309
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The traditionalapproach to studying behavior explanations involves treating them as eitherperson causes or situation causes and assessing them byusing rating scales. An analysis of people’s free-response behavior explanationsreveals, however, that the conceptual distinctions people use in their explanations aremore complex and sophisticated than the person–situation dichotomy suggests. Theauthors, therefore, introduce a model of the conceptual structure of folk behaviorexplanations (the network of concepts and assumptions on which explanations are based) andtest it in 4 studies. The modes and features of behavior explanations within thisconceptual structure also have specific social functions. In 2 additional studies, theauthors demonstrate that people alter distinct features of their explanations whenpursuing particular impression-management goals and that listeners make inferences aboutexplainers’ goals on the basis of these features.

Journal

Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Sep 1, 2000

There are no references for this article.