Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Wagner (1983)
Direct determination of gravitational harmonics from low‐low GRAVSAT dataJournal of Geophysical Research, 88
W. Kaula (1983)
Inference of variations in the gravity field from satellite-to-satellite range rateJournal of Geophysical Research, 88
C. Jekeli, R. Rapp (1980)
Accuracy of the determination of mean anomalies and mean geoid undulations from a satellite gravity field mapping mission
D. Rowlands, S. Luthcke, J. Marshall, C. Cox, R. Williamson, S. Rowton (1997)
Space Shuttle Precision Orbit Determination in Support of SLA-1 Using TDRSS and GPS Tracking Data
(2001)
GEODYN II System Documentation, Raytheon ITSS Contr
(1969)
Direct measurements of the earth's gravity potential using a satellite pair
(2000)
Gravity field recovery fl'om CHAMP: first results (abstract)
(1984)
The global mapping of gravity with two satellites, Netherlands
Ch. Cui, D. Lelgemann (2000)
On non-linear low–low SST observation equations for the determination of the geopotential based on an analytical solutionJournal of Geodesy, 74
F. Lerch (1989)
Optimum data weighting and error calibration for estimation of gravitational parametersBulletin géodésique, 65
R. Sabadini (1989)
Time variations in the gravity field
V. Zlotnicki, I. Fukumori, N. Hirose, D. Menemenlis, A. Ali (2000)
Dealiasing GRACE: the high-frequency ocean response to wind and pressure
C. Jekeli (1999)
The determination of gravitational potential differences from satellite-to-satellite trackingCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 75
O. Colombo (1989)
The dynamics of global positioning system orbits and the determination of precise ephemeridesJournal of Geophysical Research, 94
(1998)
The development of the joint NASA GSFC and NIMA geopotential model EGM96
(1998)
Improved Earth gravity solutions from TDRSS tracking (abstract), Ann. Geophysicae, xxxxxxxxxxxx
B. Tapley, C. Reigber (2001)
The Grace Mission: Status And Future Plans
C. Wagner (1987)
Improved gravitational recovery from a Geopotential Research Mission Satellite pair flying en echelonJournal of Geophysical Research, 92
C. Jekeli, T. Upadhyay (1990)
Gravity estimation from STAGE, a Satellite‐to‐Satellite Tracking MissionJournal of Geophysical Research, 95
B. Douglas, C. Goad, F. Morrison (1980)
Determination of the geopotential from satellite-to-satellite tracking dataJournal of Geophysical Research, 85
W. Bertiger, Y. Bar-Sever, E. Christensen, E. Davis, J. Guinn, B. Haines, R. Ibañez-Meier, J. Jee, S. Lichten, W. Melbourne, R. Muellerschoen, T. Munson, Y. Vigue, Sien-Chong Wu, T. Yunck, B. Schutz, P. Abusali, H. Rim, M. Watkins, P. Willis (1994)
GPS precise tracking of TOPEX/POSEIDON: Results and implicationsJournal of Geophysical Research, 99
W. Kahn, S. Klosko, W. Wells (1982)
Mean gravity anomalies from a combination of Apollo/ATS 6 and GEOS 3/ATS 6 SST tracking campaigns. [Satellite to Satellite Tracking]
A technique for the analysis of low–low intersatellite range-rate data in a gravity mapping mission is explored. The technique is based on standard tracking data analysis for orbit determination but uses a spherical coordinate representation of the 12 epoch state parameters describing the baseline between the two satellites. This representation of the state parameters is exploited to allow the intersatellite range-rate analysis to benefit from information provided by other tracking data types without large simultaneous multiple-data-type solutions. The technique appears especially valuable for estimating gravity from short arcs (e.g. less than 15 minutes) of data. Gravity recovery simulations which use short arcs are compared with those using arcs a day in length. For a high-inclination orbit, the short-arc analysis recovers low-order gravity coefficients remarkably well, although higher-order terms, especially sectorial terms, are less accurate. Simulations suggest that either long or short arcs of the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) data are likely to improve parts of the geopotential spectrum by orders of magnitude.
Journal of Geodesy – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.