Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Hayes, S. Buckland (1983)
Radial-Distance Models for the Line-Transect MethodBiometrics, 39
J. Nichols, L. Thomas, P. Conn (2009)
Inferences About Landbird Abundance from Count Data: Recent Advances and Future Directions
D. Otis, K. Burnham, G. White, David Anderson (1980)
Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populationsWildlife Monographs
D. Borchers, M. Efford (2008)
Spatially Explicit Maximum Likelihood Methods for Capture–Recapture StudiesBiometrics, 64
(1999)
Non-invasive genetic sampling and individual identification
D. Mellinger, K. Stafford, S. Moore, R. Dziak, H. Matsumoto (2007)
An Overview of Fixed Passive Acoustic Observation Methods for CetaceansOceanography, 20
M. Efford (2004)
Density estimation in live‐trapping studiesOikos, 106
J. Grand, B. Williams, J. Nichols, M. Conroy (2002)
Analysis and Management of Animal Populations
Tore Persson, H. Rootzén (1977)
Simple and highly efficient estimators for a type I censored normal sampleBiometrika, 64
R. Wiley, D. Richards (1982)
5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection
J. Royle, J. Nichols, K. Karanth, A. Gopalaswamy (2009)
A hierarchical model for estimating density in camera‐trap studiesJournal of Applied Ecology, 46
(2001)
Introduction to distance sampling
J. Royle, K. Young (2008)
A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data.Ecology, 89 8
K. Burnham, David Anderson (2003)
Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approachJournal of Wildlife Management, 67
M. Efford, D. Borchers, A. Byrom (2009)
Density Estimation by Spatially Explicit Capture–Recapture: Likelihood-Based Methods
The density of a closed population of animals occupying stable home ranges may be estimated from detections of individuals on an array of detectors, using newly developed methods for spatially explicit capture–recapture. Likelihood‐based methods provide estimates for data from multi‐catch traps or from devices that record presence without restricting animal movement (“proximity” detectors such as camera traps and hair snags). As originally proposed, these methods require multiple sampling intervals. We show that equally precise and unbiased estimates may be obtained from a single sampling interval, using only the spatial pattern of detections. This considerably extends the range of possible applications, and we illustrate the potential by estimating density from simulated detections of bird vocalizations on a microphone array. Acoustic detection can be defined as occurring when received signal strength exceeds a threshold. We suggest detection models for binary acoustic data, and for continuous data comprising measurements of all signals above the threshold. While binary data are often sufficient for density estimation, modeling signal strength improves precision when the microphone array is small.
Ecology – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 2009
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.