Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Quin (2017)
Longitudinal and Contextual Associations Between Teacher–Student Relationships and Student EngagementReview of Educational Research, 87
(2011)
Research on adult learners: Supporting the needs of a student population that is no longer nontraditional
Anthony Francescucci, Laila Rohani (2018)
Exclusively Synchronous Online (VIRI) Learning: The Impact on Student Performance and Engagement OutcomesJournal of Marketing Education, 41
Ronald Rivera, Jonathan Smart, Sangeeta Sakaria, A. Wray, Warren Wiechmann, Megan Boysen-Osborn, Shannon Toohey (2021)
Planning Engaging, Remote, Synchronous Didactics in the COVID-19 Pandemic EraJMIR Medical Education, 7
Adam Panacci (2015)
Adult Students in Higher Education: Classroom Experiences and Needs.The College Quarterly, 18
Christin Grothaus (2022)
Collaborative Online Learning across Cultures: the Role of Teaching and Social PresenceQualitative Research in Education
T. Wut, J. Xu (2021)
Person-to-person interactions in online classroom settings under the impact of COVID-19: a social presence theory perspectiveAsia Pacific Education Review, 22
Cynthia Grant, Azadeh Osanloo (2016)
Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your "House".Administrative Issues Journal, 4
Anthony Francescucci, M. Foster (2013)
The VIRI (Virtual, Interactive, Real-Time, Instructor-Led) Classroom: The Impact of Blended Synchronous Online Courses on Student Performance, Engagement, and SatisfactionCanadian Journal of Higher Education, 43
Y. Kuo, A. Walker, Kerstin Schroder, B. Belland (2014)
Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education coursesInternet High. Educ., 20
(2010)
Going for distance: Technology convergence powers growth of online education
Jason Bickle, Malar Hirudayaraj, Alaina Doyle (2019)
Social Presence Theory: Relevance for HRD/VHRD Research and PracticeAdvances in Developing Human Resources, 21
(2017)
Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationship and student engagement: A systematic review, 87
C. Tucker, Rose Zayco, K. Herman, W. Reinke, M. Trujillo, K. Carraway, Cory Wallack, Phyllis Ivery (2002)
Teacher and child variables as predictors of academic engagement among low‐income African American childrenPsychology in the Schools, 39
(2001)
Addressing the digital divide
V. Dennen, Yasin Yalçın, Jaesung Hur, Bruce Screws (2022)
Student Webcam Behaviors and Beliefs: Emergent Norms, Student Performance, and Cultural DifferencesOnline Learning
(2000)
Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education, 2
Xi Lin, Li-Li Gao (2020)
Students’ sense of community and perspectives of taking synchronous and asynchronous online courses
M. Matsunaga (2010)
How to factor-analyze your data right: do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s.International journal of psychological research, 3
(2015)
Wonderful when it works … a case study of electronically mediated guest lectures, 39
Vasile Gherheș, S. Șimon, I. Para (2021)
Analysing Students’ Reasons for Keeping Their Webcams on or off during Online ClassesSustainability
(2020)
Lights, camera, action! An innovative synchronous approach improving online nursing students’ engagement, 45
C. Tu (2000)
On-line learning migration: from social learning theory to social presence theory in a CMC environmentJ. Netw. Comput. Appl., 23
Frank Castelli, Mark Sarvary (2021)
Why students do not turn on their video cameras during online classes and an equitable and inclusive plan to encourage them to do soEcology and Evolution, 11
J. Bowden (2021)
Analogues of engagement: Assessing tertiary student engagement in contemporary face-to-face and blended learning contextsHigher Education Research & Development, 41
P. Olt (2018)
Virtually There: Distant Freshmen Blended in Classes through Synchronous Online EducationInnovative Higher Education, 43
(2002)
The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes, 16
(2014)
Facilitators’ experience of delivering asynchronous and synchronous online interprofessional education, 36
M. Händel, S. Bedenlier, B. Kopp, M. Gläser-Zikuda, R. Kammerl, A. Ziegler (2022)
The webcam and student engagement in synchronous online learning: visually or verbally?Education and Information Technologies, 27
Constance Iloh (2018)
Does distance education go the distance for adult learners? Evidence from a qualitative study at an American community collegeJournal of Adult and Continuing Education, 25
Stefan Hrastinski (2008)
Asynchronous and synchronous e-learningEducause Quarterly, 31
Živilė Sederevičiūtė-Pačiauskienė, Ilona Valantinaitė, Vaida Asakaviciute (2022)
‘Should I Turn on My Video Camera?’ The Students’ Perceptions of the use of Video Cameras in Synchronous Distant LearningElectronics
Greta Pennell, Bhoomi Thakore, R. West (2015)
Wonderful When It Works …Humanity & Society, 39
T. Wut, P. Ng, M.P Low (2023)
Engaging university students in online learning: a regional comparative study from the perspective of social presence theoryJournal of Computers in Education
M. Mcpherson, L. Bacow (2015)
Online Higher Education: Beyond the Hype Cycle †Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29
Kuo-Jen Chao, I-Chun Hung, N. Chen (2012)
On the design of online synchronous assessments in a synchronous cyber classroomJ. Comput. Assist. Learn., 28
F. Yilmaz, Ke Zhang, A. Ustun, Ramazan Yılmaz (2022)
Transactional distance perceptions, student engagement, and course satisfaction in flipped learning: a correlational studyInteractive Learning Environments, 32
(2017)
Affective teacher-student relationships and students’ engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic update and test of the mediating role of engagement, 46
(2015)
The learning experience: Training teachers using synchronous online environments, 5
(2020, July 22)
What’s lost, what’s left, what’s next: Lessons learned from the lived experiences of teachers during the 2020 novel coronavirus pandemic
Cameras may be viewed as an essential tool in online synchronous classes. They may give a sense of connectedness between the students and faculty. In fact, social presence is considered a vital factor in distance education. In our study, we examine faculty’s perception of accepted reasons for students to turn off their cameras and perceived student engagement within synchronous online courses. In this exploratory research, participants (N = 84 faculty members) completed a survey to provide insights into their perceptions. Exploratory factor analysis with polychoric correlation indicates the five most substantial faculty-accepted reasons for students turning off their cameras during synchronous online courses. The reasons are as follows: student concerns about their appearance, family or friends in the room, webcam not working, physical location, and if their appearance on camera would be a distraction to the class as justifiable reasons for having their camera off. Correlation analysis found strong associations between the identified faculty-accepted reasons for students turning off their cameras during synchronous online courses and faculty’s perceptions of course engagement with cameras turned off. In addition, we discuss the limitations and recommendations for future studies.
Interactive Learning Environments – Taylor & Francis
Published: Nov 25, 2024
Keywords: Cameras; faculty; synchronous online courses; higher education; students
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.