Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Kaula (2000)
Theory of Satellite Geodesy: Applications of Satellites to Geodesy
S. Swenson, J. Wahr (2006)
Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE dataGeophysical Research Letters, 33
M. Rodell, P. Houser, U. Jambor, J. Gottschalck, K. Mitchell, C. Meng, K. Arsenault, B. Cosgrove, J. Radakovich, M. Bosilovich, J. Entin, J. Walker, D. Lohmann, D. Toll (2004)
THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEMBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85
R. Ray (1999)
A Global Ocean Tide Model From TOPEX/POSEIDON Altimetry: GOT99.2
K. Seo, C. Wilson, Shin‐Chan Han, D. Waliser (2008)
Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) alias error from ocean tidesJournal of Geophysical Research, 113
F. Lefèvre, F. Lyard, C. Provost, E. Schrama (2002)
FES99: A Global Tide Finite Element Solution Assimilating Tide Gauge and Altimetric InformationJournal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 19
(2004)
GRACE product specification document
B. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, M. Watkins, C. Reigber (2004)
The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early resultsGeophysical Research Letters, 31
Shin‐Chan Han, C. Jekeli, C. Shum (2004)
Time‐variable aliasing effects of ocean tides, atmosphere, and continental water mass on monthly mean GRACE gravity fieldJournal of Geophysical Research, 109
(2005)
GRACE AOD 1 B Product Description Document ( Rev . 2 . 1 ) , 40 pp
J. Wahr, Mery Molenaar, F. Bryan (1998)
Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACEJournal of Geophysical Research, 103
G. Egbert, A. Bennett, M. Foreman (1994)
TOPEX/POSEIDON tides estimated using a global inverse modelJournal of Geophysical Research, 99
R. Ray, S. Luthcke (2006)
FAST TRACK PAPER: Tide model errors and GRACE gravimetry: towards a more realistic assessmentGeophysical Journal International
E. Schrama, P. Visser (2006)
Accuracy assessment of the monthly GRACE geoids based upon a simulationJournal of Geodesy, 81
W. Kaula (1966)
Theory of satellite geodesy
(2007)
GRACE aliasing error from ocean tides
(2005)
GRACE AOD1B Product Description Document (Rev. 2.1)
P. Thompson, S. Bettadpur, B. Tapley (2004)
Impact of short period, non‐tidal, temporal mass variability on GRACE gravity estimatesGeophysical Research Letters, 31
(2007)
GRACE UTCSR Level-2 Processing Standards Document for Level-2 Product Release 0004
K. Lambeck (1988)
Geophysical geodesy : the slow deformations of the earth Lambeck.
I. Fukumori, T. Lee, D. Menemnlis, L. Fu, B. Cheng, B. Tang, Z. Xing, R. Giering (2000)
A dual assimilation system for satellite altimetry
R. Ray, D. Rowlands, G. Egbert (2003)
Tidal Models in a New Era of Satellite GravimetrySpace Science Reviews, 108
J. Dickey, C. Bentley, R. Bilham, J. Carton, R. Eanes, T. Herring, W. Kaula, G. Lagerloef, S. Rojstaczer, Walter Smith, H. Dool, J. Wahr, M. Zuber (1998)
Satellite Gravity and the Geosphere: Contributions to the Study of the Solid Earth and Its Fluid Earth
SummaryThe GRACE satellite mission provides a near-continuous sequence of approximately 30-d gravity field solutions in the form of spherical harmonics (SH). Because SH functions are global while GRACE measurements are sensitive mainly to variations along the ground-track, undersampling (alias contamination) occurs. Here we investigate how geophysical signals are likely to cause alias error in GRACE gravity fields. We use actual GRACE orbits and systematically sample several types of time-varying signals that might represent either errors in geophysical models such as tide models, or unmodelled geophysical signals. We show how error in semi-diurnal tides like S2 can alias into long period variations in particular harmonics, particularly as a possible error source in the degree 2, order 0 term (C20) of GRACE fields. We also show that aliasing associated with non-tidal geophysical model errors is significant at order 15 or multiples of 15, due to the GRACE ground track spacing in longitude. This can be predicted from Kaula's resonance formula and might be reduced by suppressing amplitudes of affected harmonics.
Geophysical Journal International – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.