Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer ORIGINAL ARTICLE The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ Say-June Kim, MD, PhD, Gil-O Ryu, MD, Byung-Jo Choi, MD, Jeong-Goo Kim, MD, Kwan-Ju Lee, MD, ∗ ∗ Sang Chul Lee, MD, and Seong-Taek Oh, MD, PhD † in promoting rapid recovery. Therefore, the demonstration of non- Objective: The aim of this study was to show the safety and feasibility of inferiority in oncologic outcomes was required for the laparoscopic single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) by comparing its short-term out- surgery (LS) to be accepted, and this has been evidenced by a number comes with those following conventional laparoscopic surgery. 1–7 of studies including prospective randomized trials. Remarkably, in Summary Background Data: Single-port laparoscopic surgery maximizes 8,9 some reports, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been shown to the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, and therefore it can be an ultimate have better oncologic results than conventional open surgery; Lacy et attainment of laparoscopic surgery. However, no comparative study has ad- al showed that LS was independently associated with a reduced risk dressed its role in colorectal cancer. of tumor relapse (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.94) and death Methods: Prospectively collected data of http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Surgery Wolters Kluwer Health

The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Oh, Seong-Taek
Annals of Surgery , Volume 254 (6) – Dec 1, 2011
Download PDF
8 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/the-short-term-outcomes-of-conventional-and-single-port-laparoscopic-mfYZ5AxiWT

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Copyright
© 2011 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN
0003-4932
eISSN
1528-1140
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0b013e318237826b
pmid
22107740
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ORIGINAL ARTICLE The Short-term Outcomes of Conventional and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ ∗ Say-June Kim, MD, PhD, Gil-O Ryu, MD, Byung-Jo Choi, MD, Jeong-Goo Kim, MD, Kwan-Ju Lee, MD, ∗ ∗ Sang Chul Lee, MD, and Seong-Taek Oh, MD, PhD † in promoting rapid recovery. Therefore, the demonstration of non- Objective: The aim of this study was to show the safety and feasibility of inferiority in oncologic outcomes was required for the laparoscopic single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) by comparing its short-term out- surgery (LS) to be accepted, and this has been evidenced by a number comes with those following conventional laparoscopic surgery. 1–7 of studies including prospective randomized trials. Remarkably, in Summary Background Data: Single-port laparoscopic surgery maximizes 8,9 some reports, laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been shown to the advantages of laparoscopic surgery, and therefore it can be an ultimate have better oncologic results than conventional open surgery; Lacy et attainment of laparoscopic surgery. However, no comparative study has ad- al showed that LS was independently associated with a reduced risk dressed its role in colorectal cancer. of tumor relapse (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.94) and death Methods: Prospectively collected data of

Journal

Annals of Surgery – Wolters Kluwer Health

Published: Dec 1, 2011

There are no references for this article.