Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
In an in vitro flowmodel a constant temperature hot-film anemometer was tested, using conical needle and catheter-mounted probes. Calibration, linearization and zero-point determination as well as sensitivity change with hematocrit, angulation, flow direction and dirt deposits on the film are described. Curves were compared with those obtained simultaneously from an electromagnetic flowmeter. The hot-film anemometer was direction-insensitive and signals were seen 0.01—0.03 sec before the flowmeter signals. The frequency response of the anemometer was sufficiently high to register turbulent flow. In 27 simultaneous measurements the mean anemometer results were 6 ± 8% ( ± SD) higher than the flowmeter results and the peak results correspondingly 16 ± 6%. Both differences were significant (p < 0.001). Qualitatively hot-film anemometer curves were comparable to electromagnetic flowmeter curves. However, certain differences were demonstrated.
European Surgical Research – Karger
Published: Jan 1, 1980
Keywords: Blood velocity; Blood flow; Hot-film anemometer; Electromagnetic flowmeter
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.