Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) Various non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) have been reported to specifically inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1): for example, tetrahydroimidazobenzodiazepinone (TIBO), hydroxyethoxymethylphenylthiothymine (HEPT), dipyridodiazepinone (i.e. nevirapine), pyridinone, bis(heteroaryl)piperazine (BHAP), tert-butyldimethylsilylspiroaminooxathioledioxide (TSAO), α-anilinophenylacetamide (α-APA) and quinoxaline derivatives. These compounds interact allosterically (i.e. non-competitively with respect to the natural substrate (dNTPs)) with a specific non-substrate binding site ‘pocket’ of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). The most potent NNRTIs have been found to inhibit HIV-1 replication at nanomolar concentrations. These compounds therefore offer great potential for the treatment of HIV-1 infections. Yet, the virus may rapidly develop resistance to these drugs. The mutations conferring resistance have been mapped at the RT positions 100 (Leu × lle), 103 (Lys × Asn), 106 (Val × Ala), 108 (Val × lle), 138 (Glu × Lys), 179 (Val × Asp), 181 (Tyr × Cys), 188 (Tyr × Cys/His), 190 (Gly × Glu) and 236 (Pro × Leu). However, these mutations do not necessarily lead to cross-resistance among the various NNRTIs, and, in some cases, they have proved to be mutually suppressive. Several strategies could be envisaged to circumvent or prevent the resistance problem: switching from one NNRTI (to which the virus has developed resistance) to another (to which the virus has not developed resistance); combining different RT inhibitors that do not confer cross-resistance, or that may, in fact, even counteract development of resistance to one another; and, using sufficiently high (‘knocking-out’) concentrations of the NNRTIs from the start, so as to completely shut down virus replication and prevent resistance from emerging. NNRTIs differ in several aspects from the 2,3-dideoxynucleoside (ddN) type of RT inhibitors. An obvious strategy to be further pursued in clinical trials is based upon the combination of NNRTIs with ddNs, as such combinations may offer synergistic anti-HIV activity, while reducing the risk or rate of resistance development. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs Taylor & Francis

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)

Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs , Volume 3 (3): 19 – Mar 1, 1994

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs)

Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs , Volume 3 (3): 19 – Mar 1, 1994

Abstract

Various non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) have been reported to specifically inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1): for example, tetrahydroimidazobenzodiazepinone (TIBO), hydroxyethoxymethylphenylthiothymine (HEPT), dipyridodiazepinone (i.e. nevirapine), pyridinone, bis(heteroaryl)piperazine (BHAP), tert-butyldimethylsilylspiroaminooxathioledioxide (TSAO), α-anilinophenylacetamide (α-APA) and quinoxaline derivatives. These compounds interact allosterically (i.e. non-competitively with respect to the natural substrate (dNTPs)) with a specific non-substrate binding site ‘pocket’ of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). The most potent NNRTIs have been found to inhibit HIV-1 replication at nanomolar concentrations. These compounds therefore offer great potential for the treatment of HIV-1 infections. Yet, the virus may rapidly develop resistance to these drugs. The mutations conferring resistance have been mapped at the RT positions 100 (Leu × lle), 103 (Lys × Asn), 106 (Val × Ala), 108 (Val × lle), 138 (Glu × Lys), 179 (Val × Asp), 181 (Tyr × Cys), 188 (Tyr × Cys/His), 190 (Gly × Glu) and 236 (Pro × Leu). However, these mutations do not necessarily lead to cross-resistance among the various NNRTIs, and, in some cases, they have proved to be mutually suppressive. Several strategies could be envisaged to circumvent or prevent the resistance problem: switching from one NNRTI (to which the virus has developed resistance) to another (to which the virus has not developed resistance); combining different RT inhibitors that do not confer cross-resistance, or that may, in fact, even counteract development of resistance to one another; and, using sufficiently high (‘knocking-out’) concentrations of the NNRTIs from the start, so as to completely shut down virus replication and prevent resistance from emerging. NNRTIs differ in several aspects from the 2,3-dideoxynucleoside (ddN) type of RT inhibitors. An obvious strategy to be further pursued in clinical trials is based upon the combination of NNRTIs with ddNs, as such combinations may offer synergistic anti-HIV activity, while reducing the risk or rate of resistance development.

 
/lp/taylor-francis/non-nucleoside-reverse-transcriptase-inhibitors-nnrtis-nVjpQMayV5

References (87)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
1994 © Ashley Publications Ltd.
ISSN
1744-7658
eISSN
1354-3784
DOI
10.1517/13543784.3.3.253
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Various non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) have been reported to specifically inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1): for example, tetrahydroimidazobenzodiazepinone (TIBO), hydroxyethoxymethylphenylthiothymine (HEPT), dipyridodiazepinone (i.e. nevirapine), pyridinone, bis(heteroaryl)piperazine (BHAP), tert-butyldimethylsilylspiroaminooxathioledioxide (TSAO), α-anilinophenylacetamide (α-APA) and quinoxaline derivatives. These compounds interact allosterically (i.e. non-competitively with respect to the natural substrate (dNTPs)) with a specific non-substrate binding site ‘pocket’ of the HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT). The most potent NNRTIs have been found to inhibit HIV-1 replication at nanomolar concentrations. These compounds therefore offer great potential for the treatment of HIV-1 infections. Yet, the virus may rapidly develop resistance to these drugs. The mutations conferring resistance have been mapped at the RT positions 100 (Leu × lle), 103 (Lys × Asn), 106 (Val × Ala), 108 (Val × lle), 138 (Glu × Lys), 179 (Val × Asp), 181 (Tyr × Cys), 188 (Tyr × Cys/His), 190 (Gly × Glu) and 236 (Pro × Leu). However, these mutations do not necessarily lead to cross-resistance among the various NNRTIs, and, in some cases, they have proved to be mutually suppressive. Several strategies could be envisaged to circumvent or prevent the resistance problem: switching from one NNRTI (to which the virus has developed resistance) to another (to which the virus has not developed resistance); combining different RT inhibitors that do not confer cross-resistance, or that may, in fact, even counteract development of resistance to one another; and, using sufficiently high (‘knocking-out’) concentrations of the NNRTIs from the start, so as to completely shut down virus replication and prevent resistance from emerging. NNRTIs differ in several aspects from the 2,3-dideoxynucleoside (ddN) type of RT inhibitors. An obvious strategy to be further pursued in clinical trials is based upon the combination of NNRTIs with ddNs, as such combinations may offer synergistic anti-HIV activity, while reducing the risk or rate of resistance development.

Journal

Expert Opinion on Investigational DrugsTaylor & Francis

Published: Mar 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.