Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jeff Joireman, T. Lasane, Jennifer Bennett, Diana Richards, Salma Solaimani (2001)
Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of proenvironmental behaviour.The British journal of social psychology, 40 Pt 1
S Gächter, H Orzen, E Renner, C Starmer (2009)
Are experimental economists prone to framing effects? A natural field experimentJ Econ Behav Organ, 70
J. Bednar, S. Page (2005)
THE EMERGENCE OF CULTURAL BEHAVIOR WITHIN MULTIPLE GAMESRationality and Society, 19
K. Kanagaretnam, Stuart Mestelman, Mohamed Shehata, K. Nainar (2006)
The Impact of Sex, Value Orientations and Risk Attitudes on Trust and ReciprocityPublic Economics: Fiscal Policies & Behavior of Economic Agents eJournal
Bradley Ruffle (1998)
More Is Better, But Fair Is Fair: Tipping in Dictator and Ultimatum GamesGames and Economic Behavior, 23
Floya Anthias (2002)
Where do I belong?Ethnicities, 2
V. Crawford, Bruno Broseta (1997)
What Price Coordination? The Efficiency-Enhancing Effect of Auctioning the Right to PlayThe American Economic Review, 88
(2003)
Subsidizing public inputsJournal of Public Economics, 87
Gary Bolton, Elena Katok, R. Zwick (1998)
Dictator game giving: Rules of fairness versus acts of kindnessInternational Journal of Game Theory, 27
M Blanco, D Engelmann, HT Normann (2011)
A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferencesGames Econ Behav, 72
Guido Hertel, K. Fiedler (1994)
Affective and cognitive influences in social dilemma gameEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 24
F. Carlsson, O. Johansson-Stenman, P. Nam (2014)
Social preferences are stable over long periods of timeJournal of Public Economics, 117
S. Gächter, H. Orzen, Elke Renner, C. Starmer
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization Are Experimental Economists Prone to Framing Effects? a Natural Field Experiment
Sarah Borgloh, A. Dannenberg, Bodo Aretz (2010)
On the Construction of Social Preferences in Lab ExperimentsBehavioral & Experimental Economics eJournal
L. Cameron, Paul Brown, J. Chapman (1998)
Social Value Orientations and Decisions to Take Proenvironmental Action1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28
V. Smith (2009)
Theory and Experiment: What are the questions?
M. Vugt (2004)
Abslracl Commuting by car or public transportation ? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgements
Stefan Volk, C. Thöni, Winfried Ruigrok (2012)
Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferencesJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 81
N Buckley, K Chan, J Chowhan, S Mestelman, M Shehata (2001)
Value orientations, income, and displacement effects, and voluntary contributionsExp Econ, 4
Astrid Matthey, T. Regner (2013)
On the independence of history: experience spill-overs between experimentsTheory and Decision, 75
Yan Chen, S. Li (2009)
Group Identity and Social PreferencesThe American Economic Review, 99
J Sonnemans, F Van Dijk, F Van Winden (2006)
On the dynamics of social ties structures in groupsJ Econ Psychol, 27
N. Schwarz (1999)
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.American Psychologist, 54
I. Bohnet, B. Frey (1999)
Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: CommentThe American Economic Review, 89
D Smeesters, L Warlop, E Van Avermaet, O Corneille, V Yzerbyt (2003)
Do not prime hawks with doves: the interplay of construct activation and consistency of social value orientation on cooperative behaviorJ Pers Soc Psychol, 84
M. Deutsch (1958)
Trust and suspicionJournal of Conflict Resolution, 2
J Bednar, S Page (2007)
Can game(s) theory explain culture? The emergence of cultural behavior within multiple gamesRation Soc, 19
Rajagopal (2012)
Competition versus Cooperation
Mariana Blanco, Dirk Engelmann, Hans-Theo Normann (2010)
A Within-Subject Analysis of Other-Regarding PreferencesBehavioral & Experimental Economics
R. Burlando, F. Guala (2005)
Heterogeneous Agents in Public Goods ExperimentsExperimental Economics, 8
M. Vugt, P. Lange, R. Meertens (1996)
Commuting by car or public transportation? A social dilemma analysis of travel mode judgementsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 26
J Andreoni, J Miller (2002)
Giving according to GARP: an experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruismEconometrica, 70
M. Sass, Joachim Weimann (2012)
The Dynamics of Individual Preferences in Repeated Public Good Experiments
Guido Hertel, K. Fiedler (1998)
Fair and dependent versus egoistic and free: effects of semantic and evaluative priming on the ‘Ring Measure of Social Values’European Journal of Social Psychology, 28
J. Bednar, S. Page (2007)
Can Game(s) Theory Explain Culture?Rationality and Society, 19
D. Messick, C. McClintock (1968)
Motivational bases of choice in experimental gamesJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4
W. Au, Jessica Kwong (2004)
Measurements and Effects of Social-Value Orientation in Social Dilemmas: A Review.
C. Parks (1994)
The Predictive Ability of Social Values in Resource Dilemmas and Public Goods GamesPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20
N. Buckley, Kenneth Chan, J. Chowhan, Stuart Mestelman, Mohamed Shehata
Department of Economics Working Paper Series Value Orientations, Income and Displacement Effects, and Voluntary Contributions Value Orientations, Income and Displacement Effects, and Voluntary Contributions
T Offerman, J Sonnemans, A Schram (1996)
Value orientations, expectations and voluntary contributions in public goodsEcon J, 106
J. Iedema, M. Poppe (1994)
The effect of self-presentation on social value orientation.The Journal of social psychology, 134 6
A. Pruyn, R. Riezebos (2001)
Effects of the awareness of social dilemmas on advertising budget-setting: A scenario studyJournal of Economic Psychology, 22
C. McClintock, Scott Allison (1989)
Social Value Orientation and Helping Behavior1Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19
W. Güth, M. Levati, M. Ploner (2008)
Social identity and trust - An experimental investigation
S. Bowles, Eric Verhoogen, James Heintz, Stephanie Eckman, Nicole Huber, Melissa Os, Robert Boyd, Colin Camerer, R. Cialdini, Lilia Costabile, Joshua Cohen, Gerald Cohen, Martin Daly, Peter Dorman, Catherine Eckel, Marcus Feldman, Ernst Fehr, N. Folbre, Christina Fong, Bruno Frey, H. Gintis, Karla Hoff, Daniel Kahneman, Melvin Kohn, David Kreps, T. Kuran, George Loewenstein, Elinor Ostrom, Bentley Macleod, Paul Malherbe, K. Moene, Casey Mulligan, Richard Nisbett, Ugo Pagano, J. Platteau, John Roemer, S. Rose-Ackerman, Paul Romer, Paul Rozin, A. Schotter, Paul Seabright, Gil Skillman, Peter Skott, Rohini Soma-Nathan, Hillel Steiner, Philippe Parijs, B. Weisbrod, Elisabeth Wood, Erik Wright, Viviana Zelizer (1999)
Endogenous Preferences : The Cultural Consequences of Markets and other Economic Institutions
S. Walle, G. Ryzin (2011)
The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: Lessons from a split-ballot experimentPublic Administration, 89
J. Bednar, Yan Chen, T. Liu, S. Page (2012)
Behavioral spillovers and cognitive load in multiple games: An experimental studyGames Econ. Behav., 74
Anders Poulsen, Odile Poulsen (2006)
Endogenous Preferences and Social Dilemma InstitutionsJournal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-zeitschrift Fur Die Gesamte Staatswissenschaft, 162
D. Smeesters, L. Warlop, Eddy Avermaet, O. Corneille, V. Yzerbyt
Do Not Prime Hawks with Doves: the Interplay of Construct Activation and Consistency of Social Value Orientation on Cooperative Behavior Hertel and Fiedler (1998) Showed That Individuals with a High
Donald Griesinger, James Livingston (1973)
Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental gamesSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 18
Catherine Eckel, P. Grossman (2005)
Managing Diversity by Creating Team Identity
E. Hoffman, K. McCabe, Keith Shachat, V. Smith (1994)
Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games
G. Cornelissen, S. Dewitte, L. Warlop
Centre De Referència En Economia Analítica Barcelona Economics Working Paper Series Social Value Orientation as a Moral Intuition: Decision-making in the Dictator Game
Catherine Eckel, P. Grossman (1996)
Altruism in Anonymous Dictator GamesMicroeconomics: Welfare Economics & Collective Decision-Making eJournal
K Kanagaretnam, S Mestelman, K Nainar, M Shehata (2009)
The impact of social value orientation and risk attitudes on trust and reciprocityJ Econ Psychol, 30
A. Tversky, D. Kahneman (1981)
The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science, 211 4481
D. Balliet, C. Parks, J. Joireman (2009)
Social Value Orientation and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-AnalysisGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12
Robert Forsythe, J. Horowitz, N. Savin, Martin Sefton (1994)
Fairness in Simple Bargaining ExperimentsGames and Economic Behavior, 6
D. Frisch (1993)
Reasons for framing effects.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54
Sandy Bogaert, C. Boone, C. Declerck (2008)
Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: a review and conceptual model.The British journal of social psychology, 47 Pt 3
J. Welch, C. Swift (1992)
Question order effects in taste testing of beveragesJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20
A. Schotter, Avi Weiss, I. Zapater (1996)
Fairness and survival in ultimatum and dictatorship gamesJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 31
J. Carpenter (2003)
Is fairness used instrumentally? Evidence from sequential bargainingJournal of Economic Psychology, 24
Joep Sonnemans, F. Dijk, F. Winden (2006)
On the Dynamics of Social Ties Structures in GroupsInternational Journal of Modern Physics C
(2002)
Understanding preferences with simple tests
A. Oliveira, Catherine Eckel, Rachel Croson (2012)
The Stability of Social Preferences in a Low-Income NeighborhoodSouthern Economic Journal, 79
Robyn Mallett, Zena Mello, Dana Wagner, F. Worrell, Risë Burrow, James Andretta (2011)
Do I belong?: it depends on when you ask.Cultural diversity & ethnic minority psychology, 17 4
S. McFarland (1981)
Effects of Question Order on Survey ResponsesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 45
Roderick Kramer, C. McClintock, D. Messick (1986)
Social values and cooperative response to a simulated resource conservation crisisJournal of Personality, 54
W Au, J Kwong (2004)
Contemp psychol res soc dilemmas
Claudia Canegallo, G. Ortona, Stefania Ottone, Ferruccio Ponzano, F. Scacciati (2008)
Competition versus cooperation: Some experimental evidenceJournal of Socio-economics, 37
Ann Bowling, J. Windsor (2007)
The effects of question order and response-choice on self-rated health status in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA)Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62
J. Carpenter (2001)
Endogenous Social PreferencesReview of Radical Political Economics, 37
T. Offerman, Joep Sonnemans, A. Schram (1996)
Value Orientations, Expectations and Voluntary Contributions in Public Goods.Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
V. Weizsäcker, C. Christian (1971)
Notes on endogenous change of tastesJournal of Economic Theory, 3
D Griesinger, J Livingston (1973)
Toward a model of interpersonal motivation in experimental gamesBehav Sci, 18
J. Brosig, T. Riechmann, Joachim Weimann (2007)
Selfish in the End?:An Investigation of Consistency and Stability of individual Behavior
VU Research, Portal, van Lange, P.A.M. Otten, W. Bruin, E.N.M. Joireman, P. Lange, W. Otten, E. Bruin, J. Joireman, Hal Kelley, C. Rusbult, Ben Slugoski, A. Lange (1997)
Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence.Journal of personality and social psychology, 73 4
J. Huyck, R. Battalio, Richard Beil (1993)
Asset Markets as an Equilibrium Selection Mechanism: Coordination Failure, Game Form Auctions, and Tacit CommunicationGames and Economic Behavior, 5
We present evidence against the standard assumptions that social preferences are stable and can be measured in a reliable, nonintrusive manner. We find evidence that measures of social preferences can affect subsequent behavior. Researchers often measure social preferences by posing dictator type allocation decisions. The social value orientation (SVO) is a particular sequence of dictator decisions. We vary the order in which the SVO and a larger stakes dictator game are presented. We also vary the form of the dictator game. In one study, we employ the standard dictator game, and in the other, we employ a nonstandard dictator game. With the standard dictator game, we find that prosocial subjects act even more prosocially when the SVO is administered first, whereas selfish subjects are unaffected by the order. With the nonstandard dictator game, we find evidence across all subjects that those who first receive the SVO are more generous in the dictator game but we do not find the effect among only the generous subjects. Across both dictator game forms, we find evidence that the subjects who are first given the SVO were more generous than subjects who are given the SVO last. We also find that this effect is stronger among the subjects with a perfectly consistent SVO measure. Although we cannot determine whether the order affects preferences or the measure of preferences, our results are incompatible with the assumptions that social preferences are stable and can be measured in a reliable, nonintrusive manner.
Mind & Society – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 5, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.