Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Clipson, A. Tomos, T. Flowers, R. Jones (1985)
Salt tolerance in the halophyte Suaeda maritima L. Dum.Planta, 165
R. Leigh (2001)
Potassium homeostasis and membrane transportJournal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 164
T. Cuin, A. Miller, S. Laurie, R. Leigh (1999)
Nitrate interference with potassium-selective microelectrodesJournal of Experimental Botany, 50
Walker, Black, Miller (1998)
The role of cytosolic potassium and pH in the growth of barley rootsPlant physiology, 118 3
M. Hassidim, Y. Braun, H. Lerner, L. Reinhold (1990)
Na/H and k/h antiport in root membrane vesicles isolated from the halophyte atriplex and the glycophyte cotton.Plant physiology, 94 4
W. Fricke (1997)
Cell turgor, osmotic pressure and water potential in the upper epidermis of barley leaves in relation to cell location and in response to NaCl and air humidityJournal of Experimental Botany, 48
A. Miller, S. Cookson, Susan Smith, D. Wells (2001)
The use of microelectrodes to investigate compartmentation and the transport of metabolized inorganic ions in plants.Journal of experimental botany, 52 356
C. Fry, S. Hall, L. Blatter, J. McGuigan (1990)
Analysis and presentation of intracellular measurements obtained with ion‐selective microelectrodesExperimental Physiology, 75
R. Storey, M. Pitman, R. Stelzer (1983)
X-Ray Micro-Analysis of Cells and Cell Compartments of Atripiex spongiosaII. ROOTSJournal of Experimental Botany, 34
W. Fricke, R. Leigh, A. Tomos (1996)
The intercellular distribution of vacuolar solutes in the epidermis and mesophyll of barley leaves changes in response to NaClJournal of Experimental Botany, 47
M. Apse, G. Aharon, W. Snedden, E. Blumwald (1999)
Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis.Science, 285 5431
W. Fricke, R. Leigh, A. Tomos (2004)
Concentrations of inorganic and organic solutes in extracts from individual epidermal, mesophyll and bundle-sheath cells of barley leavesPlanta, 192
T. Flowers, A. Yeo (1995)
Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: Where next?Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 22
A. Yeo (1981)
Salt Tolerance in the Halophyte Suaeda maritima L. Dum.: Intracellular Compartmentation of IonsJournal of Experimental Botany, 32
T. Flowers, M. Hajibagheri (2001)
Salinity tolerance in Hordeum vulgare: ion concentrations in root cells of cultivars differing in salt tolerance**Plant and Soil, 231
R. Leigh, A. Tomos (1993)
Ion distribution in cereal leaves: pathways and mechanismsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 341
H. Greenway (1962)
Plant Response to Saline Substrates II. Chloride, Sodium, and Potassium Uptake and Translocation in Young Plants of Hordeum Vulgare During and After a Short Sodium Chloride TreatmentAustralian Journal of Biological Sciences, 15
E. Blumwald (2002)
Engineering salt tolerance in plants.Biotechnology & genetic engineering reviews, 20
R. Leigh, R. Jones (1984)
A HYPOTHESIS RELATING CRITICAL POTASSIUM CONCENTRATIONS FOR GROWTH TO THE DISTRIBUTION AND FUNCTIONS OF THIS ION IN THE PLANT CELLNew Phytologist, 97
A. Karley, R. Leigh, D. Sanders (2000)
Where do all the ions go? The cellular basis of differential ion accumulation in leaf cells.Trends in plant science, 5 11
M. Lubin, H. Ennis (1964)
ON THE ROLE OF INTRACELLULAR POTASSIUM IN PROTEIN SYNTHESIS.Biochimica et biophysica acta, 80
Karl Mühling, A. Läuchli (2000)
Light-induced pH and K+ changes in the apoplast of intact leavesPlanta, 212
David Walker, Susan Smith, Anthony Miller (1995)
Simultaneous Measurement of Intracellular pH and K+ or NO3- in Barley Root Cells Using Triple-Barreled, Ion-Selective Microelectrodes, 108
W. Fricke, P. Hinde, R. Leigh, A. Tomos (1995)
Vacuolar solutes in the upper epidermis of barley leavesPlanta, 196
M. Shimizu (2019)
[Electrolyte solutions].[Kango] Japanese journal of nursing, 20 10
Julia Davies, Ronald Poole, Philip Rea, Dale Sanders (1992)
Potassium transport into plant vacuoles energized directly by a proton-pumping inorganic pyrophosphatase.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 89 24
Adam Bertl, Eduardo Blumwald, Roberto Coronado, Robert Eisenberg, Goeff Findlay, Dietrich Gradmann, B. Hille, Kurt Köhler, Hans Kolb, E. Macrobbie, Gerhard Meissner, Christopher Miller, Erwin Neher, Philip Palade, Omar Pantoja, Dale Sanders, Julian Schroeder, Clifford Slayman, R. Spanswick, Alan Walker, Alan Williams (1992)
Electrical measurements on endomembranes.Science, 258 5084
F. Maathuis, A. Amtmann (1999)
K + Nutrition and Na + Toxicity: The Basis of Cellular K + /Na + RatiosAnnals of Botany, 84
(1962)
Plant responses to saline substrates
D. Carden, D. Diamond, A. Miller (2001)
An improved Na+-selective microelectrode for intracellular measurements in plant cells.Journal of experimental botany, 52 359
D. Walker, R. Leigh, A. Miller (1996)
Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate plant cells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93 19
Abstract Triple‐barrelled microelectrodes measuring K+ activity (aK), pH and membrane potential were used to make quantitative measurements of vacuolar and cytosolic aK in epidermal and mesophyll cells of barley plants grown in nutrient solution with 0 or 200 mM added NaCl. Measurements of aK were assigned to the cytosol or vacuole based on the pH measured. In epidermal cells, the salt treatment decreased aK in the vacuole from 224 to 47 mM and in the cytosol from 68 to 15 mM. In contrast, the equivalent changes in the mesophyll were from 235 to 150 mM (vacuole) and 79 to 64 mM (cytosol). Thus mechanisms exist to ameliorate the effects of salt on aK in compartments of mesophyll cells, presumably to minimize any deleterious consequences for photosynthesis. Thermodynamic calculations showed that K+ is actively transported into the vacuole of both epidermal and mesophyll cells of salinized and non‐ salinized plants. Comparison of the values of aK in K+‐replete, non‐salinized leaf cells with those previously measured in root cells of plants grown under comparable conditions indicates that cytosolic aK is similar in cells of both organs, but vacuolar aK in leaf cells is approximately twice that in roots. This suggests differences in the regulation of vacuolar aK, but not cytosolic aK, in leaf and root cells. Key words: Barley, cytosol, potassium, salinity, vacuole. Received 6 June 2002; Accepted 3 October 2002 Introduction Soil salinity is estimated to affect between 340 and 950 million hectares of land worldwide and is a serious limitation to crop productivity because the majority of crop plants are not particularly salt tolerant (Flowers and Yeo, 1995). Therefore, much effort is being directed towards identifying the physiological and biochemical processes that are affected by NaCl with the aim of modifying these to increase salt tolerance (Apse and Blumwald, 2002). Compartmentation of Na+ and Cl– in the vacuole is considered to be important in ameliorating the effects of salt on plants, and increasing Na+ transport into the vacuole has been shown to increase salt tolerance (Apse et al., 1999). In addition, the maintenance of a high cytosolic K+:Na+ ratio is also considered important (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999). Thus, the capacity of plants to counteract salinity stress may strongly depend on their ability to compartment ions in the vacuole and to minimize ionic changes in the cytosol. Although many studies have confirmed the sequestration of Na+ and Cl– in the vacuole (Storey et al., 1983; Fricke et al., 1996), the behaviour of ions in the cytosol has been more difficult to determine because the small volume of this compartment makes quantitative measurements technically difficult. Those approaches that have been used, such as X‐ray microanalysis (Storey et al., 1983; Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001) and compartmental tracer efflux analysis (Yeo, 1981), generally support the hypothesis that maintenance of the cytosolic K+:Na+ ratio is important in salt tolerance. However, none of these techniques is fully quantitative and so accurate estimates of cytosolic ion concentrations in salinized plant cells are still lacking. In particular, measurements are needed in leaf cells because adverse effects of salinity in these are likely to have significant consequences for plant productivity. The lack of such measurements represents a significant impediment to testing hypotheses about responses of plants to salt and hence to identifying targets for manipulation. Another confounding aspect is that different cell types in leaves can be quite distinct in the ionic composition of their vacuoles (Leigh and Tomos, 1993; Karley et al., 2000), raising the possibility that cytosolic ion concentrations may also vary between cells, or may respond differently to salinity in different cell types. Differential responses of cytosolic K+ in epidermal and cortical cells of K+‐deficient barley roots show that this is a real possibility (Walker et al., 1996). Triple‐barrelled microelectrodes measuring K+ activity (aK), pH, and membrane potential (Em) (Walker et al., 1995, 1996) can be used to make quantitative intracellular measurements of aK in the vacuole and cytosol of cells in situ. The inclusion of the pH‐sensing barrel allows assignment of aK values to either the vacuole or the cytosol (Walker et al., 1995). In the study described here, such electrodes were used to measure quantitatively aK in the vacuole and cytosol of leaf cells of barley plants grown in nutrient solutions with or without added NaCl. The results show that there is regulation of cytosolic aK in response to salinity, but this is restricted to mesophyll cells; cytosolic aK declines to very low levels in epidermal cells, although these remain viable. Comparison of the results with published data (Walker et al., 1996) indicates important similarities and differences in the regulation of cytosolic and vacuolar aK in K+‐replete leaf and root cells. Materials and methods Plant material and whole‐tissue measurements Barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Gerbel) seeds were germinated and grown in a modified Hoagland’s nutrient solution containing 5 mM K+ (Walker et al., 1996). Plants were grown at a constant temperature of 20 °C with a photoperiod of 16 h, a photon flux density of approximately 300 µmol m–2 s–1 at plant height, and a relative humidity of 75%. Plants were grown in unamended nutrient solution for the first 7 d after germination and then the NaCl concentration in the nutrient solution of some of the plants was increased by 50 mM d–1 to a final concentration of 200 mM. When treated in this way, the cultivar used, Gerbel, is relatively salt resistant (Flowers and Hajibagheri, 2001). All measurements were made on the third leaf from 21‐d‐old plants. This leaf had emerged and expanded after the salt treatment was imposed, and its responses to salt are similar to those of other leaves in barley (Greenway, 1962). The fresh weight and dry weight of the whole shoot and the third leaf were recorded for both control and salt‐treated plants. Tissue was dried at 80 °C for 48 h. Measurements of tissue K+ and Na+ concentrations were made by atomic absorption spectrophotometry on sap extracts prepared according to Fricke et al. (1994) from 1 cm leaf sections taken from the region where measurements were made with microelectrodes. Tissue ion concentrations are expressed as mM in tissue water. Electrophysiology Triple‐barrelled microelectrodes measuring aK, pH and Em were made and calibrated as described previously (Walker et al., 1995) except that the K+ sensor contained dibutyl sebacate as the plasticizer (Cuin et al., 1999). Potassium concentrations in calibration solutions were converted to aK using activity coefficients of between 0.75 and 0.78 (Robinson and Stokes, 1959; Walker et al., 1995). Electrodes were inserted into cells half‐way along the length of the third leaf of intact plants. Leaves were mounted on a Perspex holder with their lower edge touching a reservoir of dilute nutrient solution that also contained the reference bath electrode (Miller et al., 2001). This arrangement ensured that an electrical circuit was completed when the triple‐barrelled microelectrode was inserted into the leaf. Leaves were placed on the holder at least 30 min before the measurements were made, and stomates remained open throughout the experiment. Impalements were made in cells of the ‘trough’ region of the upper epidermis (Fricke et al., 1995; Fricke, 1997) and on the first layer of mesophyll cells immediately beneath these. Mesophyll cells were accessed by pushing the electrode through an epidermal cell. Successful penetration was monitored by following the Em, which became more negative when the electrode was within a cell. Values of aK are expressed as mean and 95% confidence limits (Fry et al., 1990). Results Treatment of the barley plants with NaCl adversely affected growth and significantly changed leaf ion concentrations. Compared with control (non‐salinized) plants, the fresh weights of the whole shoot and third leaf decreased by 47% and 35%, respectively, in plants grown in 200 mM NaCl (Fig. 1A). This change was accompanied by a decrease in leaf K+ concentration and an increase in leaf Na+ concentration (Fig. 1B). These results are comparable with those reported by Flowers and Hajibagheri (2001) for the same barley variety grown under similar conditions. Measurements of aK were assigned to the vacuole or the cytosol on the basis of the accompanying pH measurements. In both epidermal and mesophyll cells, impalements yielded two populations of pH measurements with mean values of 7.1 and 5.1 (Table 1), which were taken to indicate insertions in the cytosol and vacuole, respectively (Walker et al., 1995, 1996). Compartmental pH values were not statistically different between epidermal and mesophyll cells, and were also unaffected by salinity. The mean values of Em ranged from –83 to –91 mV in cells of non‐salinized plants, but were 16 to 28 mV less negative in salinized plants, with the greatest effect on epidermal cell Em (Table 1). There were no statistically‐significant differences between Em for impalements into the cytosol and the vacuole, suggesting that the Em across the tonoplast was close to zero. This contrasts with Arabidopsis where Miller et al. (2001) measured a trans‐tonoplast Em of about –30 mV (cytosol with respect to the vacuole; Bertl et al., 1992). In non‐salinized plants, mean vacuolar aK was 224 and 235 mM in epidermal and mesophyll cells, respectively, while the corresponding values in the cytosol were 68 and 79 mM (Table 2). Following growth in 200 mM NaCl, the mean vacuolar aK in epidermal cells declined to 47 mM and aK in the cytosol of these cells to 15 mM. In contrast, vacuolar aK in mesophyll cells decreased only to 150 mM, while, in the cytosol, aK declined to 64 mM. Discussion As far as is known, this paper reports the first quantitative measurements of cytosolic aK in leaf cell compartments of plants subjected to salt stress. Overall, the results indicate that both vacuolar and cytosolic aK in the mesophyll are maintained at the expense of the supply to the epidermis. The results are consistent with the observations by Fricke et al. (1996) who found, using single‐cell sampling, that decreases in K+ concentrations and increases in Na+ concentrations were less in vacuoles of mesophyll cells than in those of epidermal cells when plants were grown at NaCl concentrations of 100 mM or more. This indicates that mechanisms exist to ameliorate ionic changes in leaf mesophyll cells, but not in epidermal cells. This may be a device to protect and maintain the photosynthetic activity of the mesophyll cells. However, since the fresh weight of the third leaf declined by 35% in the salt‐treated plants, other changes must have affected growth detrimentally. For instance, it is possible that the decreases in aK in epidermal cell compartments may ultimately be affecting some fundamental growth process. Testing the importance of changes in subcellular ion activities in response to salinity will require investigation to relate the ion activities to the rates of key physiological processes, as done for cytosolic aK and protein synthesis in K+‐deficient barley roots (Walker et al., 1998). The differential behaviour of mesophyll and epidermal cells is similar to that seen in K+‐deficient barley roots where cytosolic aK declined to a much greater extent in epidermal cells than in cortical cells (Walker et al., 1996). These collective observations indicate that ion supplies to key cell types in both leaves and roots are protected in order to maintain their function in response to deficiencies or excesses of ions. How this is achieved in leaves is unclear, but the observation is consistent with work showing that epidermal and mesophyll cells have quite distinct ionic compositions (Leigh and Tomos, 1993; Karley et al., 2000). It seems clear that supply and/or retention of ions in different cell types is important in leaf function and in responses to ionic stresses. Leigh and Wyn Jones (1984) proposed that cytosolic K+ concentrations are buffered by the mobilization of vacuolar K+. Measurements of cytosolic and vacuolar aK in barley roots grown under a range of external K+ concentrations supported this contention, with cytosolic aK declining only when the vacuolar aK fell below about 25 mM (Walker et al., 1996). This does not seem to occur in leaf epidermal cells of salt‐grown barley where cytosolic aK declined to 15 mM despite the vacuole still containing about 50 mM K+ (Table 2). Why the vacuolar pool is not fully mobilized to maintain cytosolic aK is unclear. It is unlikely to be due to the existence of a minimum K+ concentration below which the vacuolar pool cannot decline (as proposed by Leigh and Wyn Jones, 1984) because very low K+ concentrations can be measured in sap extracted from epidermal vacuoles of leaves of barley plants grown in 150 mM NaCl (Fricke et al., 1996). Therefore, it seems more likely that the maintenance of a high cytosolic aK is not important in these cells, and so it declines, despite the availability of vacuolar K+. Fricke et al. (1996) observed large differences in K+ concentrations in vacuolar sap extracts from different epidermal cells of salt‐grown leaves, so it is important that other cells are investigated in order to determine whether the behaviour of vacuolar and cytosolic aK observed in upper epidermal ‘trough’ cells is typical of all epidermal cells. At 15 mM, the cytosolic aK in the ‘trough’ epidermal cells from the salt‐grown plants was at levels considered inadequate to support key K+‐dependent functions such as protein synthesis (Lubin and Ennis, 1964; Leigh and Wyn Jones, 1984; Walker et al., 1998). It therefore seems unlikely that these cells are particularly metabolically active. Nonetheless, they appear to retain their viability, as evident by (1) a relatively negative Em, indicating that their plasma membrane is intact and ion transporters functioning; (2) a near‐neutral cytosolic pH, which, at the measured values of Em and a typical leaf apoplastic pH of about 5.5 (Mühling and Läuchli, 2000), could only be maintained by active H+ extrusion; and (3) a turgor of approximately 0.9 MPa with correspondingly high sap osmotic pressure and ion concentrations (Fricke, 1997; Fricke et al., 1996). Thus, cytosolic aK values below those normally considered optimal for protein synthesis do not necessarily lead to a loss of viability of epidermal cells. The compartment‐specific values of Em, pH and aK obtained with the triple‐barrelled microelectrodes provide sufficient information to make thermodynamic calculations of the direction of active K+ transport at the tonoplast, and the feasibility of different active transport mechanisms (see Walker et al., 1996, for equations). These calculations (results not presented) show that for both epidermal and mesophyll cells, under both sets of growth conditions, K+ is always actively transported into the vacuole. Two possible mechanisms for active transport into the vacuole have been proposed, a 1:1 K+‐H+ antiport (Hassidim et al., 1990) and the vacuolar K+‐dependent, H+‐transporting inorganic pyrophosphatase (Davies et al., 1992). Calculations of the thermodynamic feasibility of each of these indicates that both are possible mechanisms in barley leaf cells (results not shown). Therefore, it seems that salinization of barley leaf cells does not have any obvious effect on the direction or mechanism of active K+ transport at the tonoplast. This contrasts with K+‐deprivation in barley roots which changes the direction of active K+ transport from into the vacuole in K+‐replete conditions to into the cytosol in K+‐deficiency (Walker et al., 1996). It was not possible to make similar calculations for active K+ transport at the plasma membrane of leaf cells because aK in the apoplast of control and salinized leaves was not measured. Walker et al. (1996) showed that cytosolic and vacuolar aK in K+‐replete barley root cells are about 80 mM and 120 mM, respectively, with little difference between epidermal and cortical cells. Comparison of these values with those for leaf cells from K+‐replete, non‐salinized plants (Table 2) shows that the aK in the vacuoles of leaf cells is approximately twice that in the root cells, but the cytosolic values are similar. This indicates that cytosolic aK is regulated to similar values in diferent cell types of barley while vacuolar aK has different set points in root and leaf cells (see also Leigh, 2001). It would now be interesting to determine what regulatory processes operate on K+ transport at the plasma membrane and tonoplast to bring about this uniformity of cytosolic aK, but differences in the vacuolar values. In particular, tonoplast transport must be under quite different control in root cells compared to leaf cells. Finally, the work reported here will assist in attempts to use Na+‐selective microelectrodes to measure the effect of salinity on cytosolic and vacuolar Na+ activities (Carden et al., 2001). Currently‐available Na+ sensors show some sensitivity to K+, especially at Na+ activities between 1 and 10 mM (Carden et al., 2001). Therefore, knowledge of the values and behaviour of subcellular aK in salinized plant cells is an important prerequisite for such studies. An approach combining the use of Na+‐ and K+‐selective microelectrodes would allow the effects of salinity on cytosolic activities of these ions to be quantified and so allow hypotheses about the importance of cytosolic K+:Na+ ratio in salinity tolerance to be tested (Maathuis and Amtmann, 1999). Acknowledgements The research was supported by grant B104CT960775 from the EU Biotechnology Programme 1994–1998. Rothamsted Research and Long Ashton Research Station are grant aided by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK. View largeDownload slide Fig. 1. Fresh weights of the whole shoot and third leaf (A) and ion concentrations in the third leaf (B) of 21‐d‐old barley plants grown in nutrient solution containing 0 mM or 200 mM added NaCl. Results are mean ±SD (n=9). View largeDownload slide Fig. 1. Fresh weights of the whole shoot and third leaf (A) and ion concentrations in the third leaf (B) of 21‐d‐old barley plants grown in nutrient solution containing 0 mM or 200 mM added NaCl. Results are mean ±SD (n=9). Table 1. Vacuolar and cytosolic pH and membrane potentials (Em) in ‘trough’ cells of the upper epidermis and in mesophyll cells of the third leaf of 21‐d‐old barley plants grown in nutrient solution containing 0 or 200 mM added NaCl Values of Em were all measured with respect to the bath solution in which the lower edge of the leaf was immersed (see Materials and methods). Results are given as mean ±SD. The number of separate measurements is given in brackets. NaCl (mM) Epidermis Mesophyll Vacuole Cytosol Vacuole Cytosol pH Em (mV) pH Em (mV) pH Em (mV) pH Em (mV) 0 5.1±0.4(19) –86±10(21) 7.2±0.2(10) –83±9(10) 5.0±0.3(9) –87±15(10) 7.0±0.1(11) –91±15(12) 200 5.1±0.2(12) –58±10(13) 7.0±0.2(9) –57±8(12) 5.0±0.4(7) –71±19(7) 7.2±0.1(8) –64±16(10) NaCl (mM) Epidermis Mesophyll Vacuole Cytosol Vacuole Cytosol pH Em (mV) pH Em (mV) pH Em (mV) pH Em (mV) 0 5.1±0.4(19) –86±10(21) 7.2±0.2(10) –83±9(10) 5.0±0.3(9) –87±15(10) 7.0±0.1(11) –91±15(12) 200 5.1±0.2(12) –58±10(13) 7.0±0.2(9) –57±8(12) 5.0±0.4(7) –71±19(7) 7.2±0.1(8) –64±16(10) View Large Table 2. Compartmental aKin ‘trough’ cells of the upper epidermis and in mesophyll cells of the third leaf of 21‐d‐old barley plants grown in nutrient solution containing 0 or 200 mM added NaCl Results are given as mean and 95% confidence limits (Fry et al., 1990). The number of separate measurements is indicated in square brackets. NaCl (mM) Compartmental aK (mM) Epidermis Mesophyll Vacuole Cytosol Vacuole Cytosol 0 224 (259, 193) [8] 68 (77, 61) [6] 235 (259, 213) [7] 79 (91, 68) [7] 200 47 (55, 25) [7] 15 (20, 11) [9] 150 (175, 128) [8] 64 (75, 55) [8] NaCl (mM) Compartmental aK (mM) Epidermis Mesophyll Vacuole Cytosol Vacuole Cytosol 0 224 (259, 193) [8] 68 (77, 61) [6] 235 (259, 213) [7] 79 (91, 68) [7] 200 47 (55, 25) [7] 15 (20, 11) [9] 150 (175, 128) [8] 64 (75, 55) [8] View Large References ApseMP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E. 1999. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science 285, 1256–1258. Google Scholar ApseMP, Blumwald E. 2002. Engineering salt tolerance in plants. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 13, 146–150. Google Scholar BertlA, Blumwald E, Coronado R,et al. 1992. Electrical measurements on endomembranes. Science 258, 873–874. Google Scholar CardenDE, Diamond D, Miller AJ. 2001. An improved Na+‐selective microelectrode for intracellular measurements in plant cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 1353–1359. Google Scholar CuinTA, Miller AJ, Laurie SA, Leigh RA. 1999. Nitrate interference with potassium‐selective microelectrodes. Journal of Experimental Botany 50, 1709–1712. Google Scholar DaviesJM, Poole RJ, Rea PA, Sanders D. 1992. Potassium transport into plant vacuoles energized directly by a proton‐pumping inorganic pyrophosphatase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89, 11701–11705. Google Scholar FlowersTJ, Hajibagheri MA. 2001. Salinity tolerance in Hordeum vulgare: ion concentrations in root cells of cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Plant and Soil 231, 1–9. Google Scholar FlowersTJ, Yeo AR. 1995. Breeding for salinity resistance in crop plants: Where next? Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 22, 875–884. Google Scholar FrickeW. 1997. Cell turgor, osmotic pressure and water potential in the upper epidermis of barley leaves in relation to cell location and in response to NaCl and air humidity. Journal of Experimental Botany 48, 45–58. Google Scholar FrickeW, Hinde PS, Leigh RA, Tomos AD. 1995. Vacuolar solutes in the upper epidermis of barley leaves. Intercellular differences follow patterns. Planta 196, 40–49. Google Scholar FrickeW, Leigh RA, Tomos AD. 1994. Concentrations of inorganic and organic solutes in extracts from individual epidermal, mesophyll and bundle‐sheath cells of barley leaves. Planta 192, 310–316. Google Scholar FrickeW, Leigh RA, Tomos AD. 1996. The intercellular distribution of vacuolar solutes in the epidermis and mesophyll of barley leaves changes in response to NaCl. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1413–1426. Google Scholar FryCH, Hall SK, Blatter LA, McGuigan JAS. 1990. Analysis and presentation of intracellular measurements obtained with ion‐selective microelectrodes. Experimental Physiology 75, 287–299. Google Scholar GreenwayH. 1962. Plant responses to saline substrates. II. Chloride, sodium and potassium uptake and translocation in young plants of Hordeum vulgare during and after a short sodium chloride treatment. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 39–57. Google Scholar HassidimM, Braun Y, Lerner HR, Reinhold L. 1990. Na+/H+ and K+/H+ antiport in root membrane vesicles isolated from the halophyte Atriplex and the glycophyte cotton. Plant Physiology 94, 1795–1801. Google Scholar KarleyAJ, Leigh RA, Sanders D. 2000. Where do all the ions go? The cellular basis of differential ion accumulation in leaf cells. Trends in Plant Science 5, 465–470. Google Scholar LeighRA. 2001. Potassium homeostasis and membrane transport. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 164, 193–198. Google Scholar LeighRA, Tomos AD. 1993. Ion distribution in cereal leaves—pathways and mechanisms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 341, 75–86. Google Scholar LeighRA, Wyn Jones RG. 1984. A hypothesis relating critical potassium concentrations for growth to the distribution and functions of this ion in the plant cell. New Phytologist 97, 1–13. Google Scholar LubinM, Ennis HL. 1964. On the role of intracellular potassium in protein synthesis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 80, 614–631. Google Scholar MaathuisFJM, Amtmann A. 1999. K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Annals of Botany 84, 123–133. Google Scholar MillerAJ, Cookson SJ, Smith SJ, Wells DM. 2001. The use of microelectrodes to investigate compartmentation and the transport of metabolized inorganic ions in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 52, 541–549. Google Scholar MühlingKH, Läuchli A. 2000. Light‐induced pH and K+ changes in the apoplast of intact leaves. Planta 212, 9–15. Google Scholar RobinsonRA, Stokes RH. 1959. Electrolyte solutions. London: Butterworths. Google Scholar StoreyR, Pitman MG, Stelzer R, Carter C. 1983. X‐ray microanalysis of cells and cell compartments of Atriplex spongiosa. I. Leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany 34, 778–794. Google Scholar WalkerDJ, Black CR, Miller AJ. 1998. Role of cytosolic potassium and pH in the growth of barley roots. Plant Physiology 118, 957–964. Google Scholar WalkerDJ, Leigh RA, Miller AJ. 1996. Potassium homeostasis in vacuolate plant cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 10510–10514. Google Scholar WalkerDJ, Smith SJ, Miller AJ. 1995. Simultaneous measurement of intracellular pH and K+ or NO3– in barley roots using triple‐barreled, ion‐selective microelectrodes. Plant Physiology 108, 743–751. Google Scholar YeoAR. 1981. Salt tolerance in the halophyte Suaeda maritima L. Dum: intracellular compartmentation of ions. Journal of Experimental Botany 32, 487–497. Google Scholar
Journal of Experimental Botany – Oxford University Press
Published: Feb 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.