Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method.

Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method. To test the accuracy of self-reported energy intake, reported intake was compared with measured energy expenditure. Results from nine studies were reviewed in which intake data were obtained by recall or weighed record for at least 7 days. Expenditure was measured for 7 days or more by the doubly labelled water method. Individual differences between reported intake and expenditure were large (range +25 to -76%). Group mean differences were smaller. Lean, nonathletic groups living in industrialized countries demonstrated the smallest mean difference between self-reported energy intakes and expenditure (0 to -20%). Obese populations demonstrated the largest mean differences (-35 and -50%), but women living in the Gambia and elite athletes also demonstrated large mean differences. Most of the difference appears to be due to under-reporting, but some subjects lost weight during the reporting period indicating that some of the difference was due to undereating. Because the greatest bias was observed in obese subjects, current methods for self-reported energy intake are not recommended for use in obesity research. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology Pubmed

Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method.

Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology , Volume 68 (7): -931 – Sep 20, 1990

Inaccuracies in self-reported intake identified by comparison with the doubly labelled water method.


Abstract

To test the accuracy of self-reported energy intake, reported intake was compared with measured energy expenditure. Results from nine studies were reviewed in which intake data were obtained by recall or weighed record for at least 7 days. Expenditure was measured for 7 days or more by the doubly labelled water method. Individual differences between reported intake and expenditure were large (range +25 to -76%). Group mean differences were smaller. Lean, nonathletic groups living in industrialized countries demonstrated the smallest mean difference between self-reported energy intakes and expenditure (0 to -20%). Obese populations demonstrated the largest mean differences (-35 and -50%), but women living in the Gambia and elite athletes also demonstrated large mean differences. Most of the difference appears to be due to under-reporting, but some subjects lost weight during the reporting period indicating that some of the difference was due to undereating. Because the greatest bias was observed in obese subjects, current methods for self-reported energy intake are not recommended for use in obesity research.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/pubmed/inaccuracies-in-self-reported-intake-identified-by-comparison-with-the-q8uGkhuGO7

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

ISSN
0008-4212
DOI
10.1139/y90-143
pmid
2200586

Abstract

To test the accuracy of self-reported energy intake, reported intake was compared with measured energy expenditure. Results from nine studies were reviewed in which intake data were obtained by recall or weighed record for at least 7 days. Expenditure was measured for 7 days or more by the doubly labelled water method. Individual differences between reported intake and expenditure were large (range +25 to -76%). Group mean differences were smaller. Lean, nonathletic groups living in industrialized countries demonstrated the smallest mean difference between self-reported energy intakes and expenditure (0 to -20%). Obese populations demonstrated the largest mean differences (-35 and -50%), but women living in the Gambia and elite athletes also demonstrated large mean differences. Most of the difference appears to be due to under-reporting, but some subjects lost weight during the reporting period indicating that some of the difference was due to undereating. Because the greatest bias was observed in obese subjects, current methods for self-reported energy intake are not recommended for use in obesity research.

Journal

Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacologyPubmed

Published: Sep 20, 1990

There are no references for this article.