K. Newell (1976)
Knowledge Of Results And Motor LearningExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 4
J. Adams, E. Goetz (1973)
Feedback and practice as variables in error detection and correction.Journal of motor behavior, 5 4
D. Sherwood (1996)
The benefits of random variable practice for spatial accuracy and error detection in a rapid aiming task.Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 67 1
J. Adams, E. Goetz, P. Marshall (1972)
Response feedback and motor learning.Journal of experimental psychology, 92 3
John Liu, C. Wrisberg (1997)
The effect of knowledge of results delay and the subjective estimation of movement form on the acquisition and retention of a motor skill.Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 68 2
R. Schmidt (1975)
A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning.Psychological Review, 82
G. Wulf, Timothy Lee (1993)
Contextual interference in movements of the same class: differential effects on program and parameter learning.Journal of motor behavior, 25 4
G. Wulf (1992)
Reducing Knowledge of Results Can Produce Context Effects in Movements of the Same ClassJournal of Human Movement Studies, 22
Timothy Lee, G. Wulf, R. Schmidt (1992)
Contextual Interference in Motor Learning: Dissociated Effects Due to the Nature of Task VariationsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44
R. Oldfield (1971)
The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.Neuropsychologia, 9 1
(1990)
Authors' Notes The authors
J. Adams (1971)
A closed-loop theory of motor learning.Journal of motor behavior, 3 2
R. Schmidt, C. Wrisberg (1973)
Further tests of adams' closed-loop theory.Journal of motor behavior, 5 3
(1973)
Further tests of Adams’ closed-loop theoly: Response-produced feedback and the ermr detection mechanism. J u u d o f M o f u r ~
D. Sherwood (1994)
Interlimb amplitude differences, spatial assimilations, and the temporal structure of rapid bimanual movementsHuman Movement Science, 13
Hiroshi Sekiya, R. Magill, David Anderson (1996)
The contextual interference effect in parameter modifications of the same generalized motor program.Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 67 1
J. Shea, R. Morgan (1979)
Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5
S. Swinnen, R. Schmidt, D. Nicholson, D. Shapiro (1990)
Information Feedback for Skill Acquisition: Instantaneous Knowledge of Results Degrades LearningJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 16
J. Hogan, B. Yanowitz (1978)
The role of verbal estimates of movement error in ballistic skill acquisition.Journal of motor behavior, 10 2
R. Schmidt, Janice White (1972)
Evidence for an error detection mechanism in motor skills.Journal of motor behavior, 4 3
C. Wood, C. Ging (1991)
The role of interference and task similarity on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of simple motor skills.Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 62 1
Robert Pigott, D. Shapiro (1984)
Motor Schema: The Structure of the Variability SessionResearch Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 55
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport 02000 by the American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance Vol. 71, No. 4, pp. 398-402 The Benefits of Random Variable Practice for Accuracy and Temporal Error Detection in a Rapid Aiming Task Spencer Green and David E. Sherwood capability with practice. Generally, the greater the num- Kty words: contextual interference, practice organization, recognition capability, timing accuracy ber of practice trials the better the error detection capa- bility (Adams & Goetz, 1973; Adams, Goetz, & Marshall, e capability of individuals to detect and correct move- 1972). However, efforts to show that error detection capa- T” ment errors based on response-produced feedback has bility is also influenced by the quality and amount of in- long been recognized as a crucial element in learning trinsic feedback has met with mixed results (Adams & motor skills. Learners who could evaluate intrinsic feed- Goetz, 197RAdams et al., 1972; Schmidt 8c Wrisberg, 1973). back and correct their own errors could continue to im- More recent work has focused on investigating vari- prove without the constant need for a teacher or coach. In ables and techniques that might improve error detection fact, the capability to detect and
Research Quarterly for Exercise & Sport – Taylor & Francis
Published: Dec 1, 2000
Keywords: contextual interference; practice organization; recognition capability; timing accuracy
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.