Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Two- versus three-dimensional quantum confinement in indium phosphide wires and dots

Two- versus three-dimensional quantum confinement in indium phosphide wires and dots The size dependence of the bandgap is the most identifiable aspect of quantum confinement in semiconductors; the bandgap increases as the nanostructure size decreases 1,2,3 . The bandgaps in one-dimensional (1D)-confined wells, 2D-confined wires, and 3D-confined dots should evolve differently with size as a result of the differing dimensionality of confinement 1 . However, no systematic experimental comparisons of analogous 1D, 2D or 3D confinement systems have been made. Here we report growth of indium phosphide (InP) quantum wires having diameters in the strong-confinement regime, and a comparison of their bandgaps with those previously reported for InP quantum dots 4,5,6,7 . We provide theoretical evidence to establish that the quantum confinement observed in the InP wires is weakened to the expected extent, relative to that in InP dots, by the loss of one confinement dimension. Quantum wires sometimes behave as strings of quantum dots 8 , and we propose an analysis to generally distinguish quantum-wire from quantum-dot behaviour. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nature Materials Springer Journals

Two- versus three-dimensional quantum confinement in indium phosphide wires and dots

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/two-versus-three-dimensional-quantum-confinement-in-indium-phosphide-s4XAOYbamc

References (32)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 by Nature Publishing Group
Subject
Materials Science; Materials Science, general; Optical and Electronic Materials; Biomaterials; Nanotechnology; Condensed Matter Physics
ISSN
1476-1122
eISSN
1476-4660
DOI
10.1038/nmat942
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The size dependence of the bandgap is the most identifiable aspect of quantum confinement in semiconductors; the bandgap increases as the nanostructure size decreases 1,2,3 . The bandgaps in one-dimensional (1D)-confined wells, 2D-confined wires, and 3D-confined dots should evolve differently with size as a result of the differing dimensionality of confinement 1 . However, no systematic experimental comparisons of analogous 1D, 2D or 3D confinement systems have been made. Here we report growth of indium phosphide (InP) quantum wires having diameters in the strong-confinement regime, and a comparison of their bandgaps with those previously reported for InP quantum dots 4,5,6,7 . We provide theoretical evidence to establish that the quantum confinement observed in the InP wires is weakened to the expected extent, relative to that in InP dots, by the loss of one confinement dimension. Quantum wires sometimes behave as strings of quantum dots 8 , and we propose an analysis to generally distinguish quantum-wire from quantum-dot behaviour.

Journal

Nature MaterialsSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 20, 2003

There are no references for this article.