Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Cohen (1971)
Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang
G. Benz, F. Redl, D. Wineman (1951)
Children Who Hate
D. Heise (1968)
Norms and Individual Patterns in Student DeviancySocial Problems, 16
A. Cohen, J. Short (1958)
Research in Delinquent SubculturesJournal of Social Issues, 14
Frank Hartung, A. Cohen (1955)
Delinquent Boys: The Culture of the Gang.American Sociological Review, 20
David Matza (1966)
Delinquency and Drift
J. Yinger (1960)
CONTRACULTURE AND SUBCULTUREAmerican Sociological Review, 25
Donald Barrett, Richard Cloward, L. Ohlin (1960)
Delinquency And Opportunity
Lamar Empey (1967)
Delinquency Theory and Recent ResearchJournal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 4
R. Sorensen, W. Reckless (2017)
The Crime Problem
T. Hirschi (1970)
Causes of Delinquency.British medical journal, 2 4674
T. Kemper (1968)
Reference groups, socialization and achievement.American sociological review, 33 1
Gresham Sykes, David Matza (1957)
Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency.American Sociological Review, 22
David Matza, Gresham Sykes (1961)
Juvenile Delinquency and Subterranean ValuesAmerican Sociological Review, 26
Abstract The relationship among moral norms, perception of peer behavioral norms, and behavioral attachment of institutionalized delinquents is examined using hypothetical problem situations. The study finds that delinquent behavioral attachment is doubly deviant. It is deviant from their own private moral norms, which are generally socially acceptable, and from their perception of their peers' norms, which they believe to be more deviant than their own behavior. This supports the formulation of Sykes and Matza that delinquents hold private norms which are consistent with the dominant social norms but transmit miscues to their peers suggestive of a delinquent commitment. Indeed, our data suggest that the delinquent is often less deviant from his moral norms than his comparative reference group. The data are discussed in relationship to the contributions of such others as Cohen and Short, Baum and Wheeler, Empey, Kemper, Reckless, the Schwendingers, and Yinger. This content is only available as a PDF. Author notes * The authors are indebted to personnel at the Kansas Boys Industrial School for their cooperation in data collection and to George R. Peters for his comments on earlier versions of this paper. © 1971 Society for the Study of Social Problems, Inc.
Social Problems – Oxford University Press
Published: Jul 1, 1971
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.