Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Moe (1984)
The New Economics of OrganizationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 28
B. Meulen, Donald Westerheijden, A. Rip, F. Vught (1991)
Verkenningscommissies tussen veld en overheid : evaluatie-onderzoek verkenningscommissies
Mats Benner, U. Sandström (2000)
Inertia and change in Scandinavian public-sector research systems: the case of biotechnologyScience and Public Policy, 27
H. Skoie (2000)
Diversity and identity: The merger of five research councils in NorwayScience and Public Policy, 27
L. Leydesdorff, H. Etzkowitz (1996)
Emergence of a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government RelationsScience and Public Policy, 23
L. Leydesdorff (2000)
The triple helix: an evolutionary model of innovationsResearch Policy, 29
C. Fajina, M. Gibbons (1979)
A Quantitative Analysis of the Science Research council's Policy of 'Selectivity and Concentration' : Research Policy, 3
S. Turner (1990)
Forms of Patronage
Mark Granovetter (1985)
Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of EmbeddednessAmerican Journal of Sociology, 91
D. Guston (2000)
Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Reseach
J. Coleman (1990)
Foundations of Social Theory
B. Meulen (1998)
Science policies as principal-agent games: Institutionalization and path dependency in the relation between government and scienceResearch Policy, 27
Sonia Alonso, Jose Fernandez, Luis Menéndez (1999)
Spanish Public Research Centres' responses to changes: diversification of funding sources
D. Guston (1996)
Principal-agent theory and the structure of science policyScience and Public Policy, 23
D. Braun (1993)
Who Governs Intermediary Agencies? Principal-Agent Relations in Research Policy-MakingJournal of Public Policy, 13
S. Dresner (2002)
A tale of two ministers: Attempts at reform of research systems in the Netherlands and the United KingdomScience and Public Policy, 29
H. Etzkowitz, L. Leydesdorff (2000)
The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and
Research councils have mediated the principal-agent relation between government and science: they are expected to mediate the political and policy interests in scientific research into the world of science and technology and promote the interests of science and technology in the policy world. Traditionally, research councils managed this ambiguous position by funding peer-reviewed research projects. Changed ideas about the role of science in our society have challenged them to develop new policy instruments and reconsider their position in relation to science, policy and society. This new position is analysed through a study of the six divisions of the Norwegian Research Council, which display differences in the extent to which they have developed strategies in their own terms rather than those of other parties.
Science and Public Policy – Oxford University Press
Published: Oct 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.