Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs

Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A... The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of different surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. Hollow‐cylinder implants with six different surfaces were placed in the metaphyses of the tibia and femur in six miniature pigs. After 3 and 6 weeks, the implants with surrounding bone were removed and analyzed in undecalcified transverse sections. The histologic examination revealed direct bone‐implant contact for all implants. However, the morphometric analyses demonstrated significant differences in the percentage of bone‐implant contact, when measured in cancellous bone. Electropolished as well as the sandblasted and acid pickled (medium grit; HF/HNO3) implant surfaces had the lowest percentage of bone contact with mean values ranging between 20 and 25%. Sandblasted implants with a large grit and titanium plasmasprayed implants demonstrated 30–40% mean bone contact. The highest extent of bone‐implant interface was observed in sandblasted and acid attacked surfaces (large grit; HCl/H2SO4) with mean values of 50–60%, and hydroxylapatite (HA)‐coated implants with 60–70%. However, the HA coating consistently revealed signs of resorption. It can be concluded that the extent of bone‐implant interface is positively correlated with an increasing roughness of the implant surface. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A Wiley

Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/influence-of-surface-characteristics-on-bone-integration-of-titanium-uXQfvRTUTA

References (40)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
1549-3296
eISSN
1552-4965
DOI
10.1002/jbm.820250708
pmid
1918105
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of different surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. Hollow‐cylinder implants with six different surfaces were placed in the metaphyses of the tibia and femur in six miniature pigs. After 3 and 6 weeks, the implants with surrounding bone were removed and analyzed in undecalcified transverse sections. The histologic examination revealed direct bone‐implant contact for all implants. However, the morphometric analyses demonstrated significant differences in the percentage of bone‐implant contact, when measured in cancellous bone. Electropolished as well as the sandblasted and acid pickled (medium grit; HF/HNO3) implant surfaces had the lowest percentage of bone contact with mean values ranging between 20 and 25%. Sandblasted implants with a large grit and titanium plasmasprayed implants demonstrated 30–40% mean bone contact. The highest extent of bone‐implant interface was observed in sandblasted and acid attacked surfaces (large grit; HCl/H2SO4) with mean values of 50–60%, and hydroxylapatite (HA)‐coated implants with 60–70%. However, the HA coating consistently revealed signs of resorption. It can be concluded that the extent of bone‐implant interface is positively correlated with an increasing roughness of the implant surface.

Journal

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A – Wiley

Published: Jul 1, 1991

There are no references for this article.