the evidence is ... strongly against the existence of a characteristic J radiation" ' — a conclusion with which Barkla was by 1923 in full agreement! 16
(1925)
A Repeatof Some of Barkla's Measurements on Irregularities in the Absorption of X-rays by Aluminium (the so-called J phenomenon)
(1970)
Research Physicist’, Science, Vol
(1927)
Repeatof Some of Barkla’s Measurements on Irregularities in the Absorption of X-rays by Aluminium (the so-called J phenomenon)
The Seven Sexes
(a) note 39, 967. Barkla is known to have been severely upset by
(1975)
We can then see 'proofs' as acts of moral persuasion
(1925)
Khastigir, ’J Phenomena in X-rays, Part II: Application to Scattered Rays
(1973)
Barkla’s research students, referred to this (Interview
A. Compton (1961)
The Scattering of X Rays as ParticlesAmerican Journal of Physics, 29
B. Worsnop
The scattering of X-rays and the "J" phenomenon, 39
Barkla in fact pursued his hypothesis unrelentingly well into the 1930s
J Phenomena in X-rays, Part II: Application to Scattered Rays
R. Dunbar (1928)
XCIX.Apparent irregularities in experiments with heterogeneous X-ray beams, with special reference to the J-phenomenonPhilosophical Magazine Series 1, 5
Marion Ross, one of Barkla's research students
Barkla used essentially the same conception in a letter on the subject to Joseph Larmor
W. Duane, Takeo Shimizu (1919)
On the Spectrum of X-Rays from an Aluminium TargetPhysical Review, 14
(1925)
Spectroscopic Evidence in X-ray Scattering
(1945)
See also note 15. 38. Op. cit. note 30. 39. (a)
(1924)
Phenomena and X-ray Scattering
For this reason SCIENTIA, from this year on, has been radically changed, with a Scientific Editorial Board which guarantees it rigour and coherence, and a new-and clearer typographical lay-out
(1965)
Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1971) for a representative sample of readings. Approaches towards science generally similar to this one are H. Collins
A. Compton (1923)
XCV. Absorption measurements of the change of wave-length accompanying the scattering of X-raysPhilosophical Magazine Series 1, 46
M. B.Sc. (1917)
XXIX. Notes on the absorption and scattering of X-rays, and the characteristic radiations of J seriesPhilosophical Magazine Series 1, 34
(1900)
The Modem Theories
C. Barkla (1925)
CIII. The J phenomenon in X-rays. (Part I.)Philosophical Magazine Series 1, 49
(1967)
under-appreciated role of Barkla in the early development of X-ray research and electron theory of the atom
(1926)
The Control of the J Phenomenon (Part IV)
(1925)
And an earlier paper displaying a significantly different attitude:(b) R.T. Dunbar, 'The J Phenomenon and the Quantum Theory of X-ray Scattering
It could be this which made Barkla refuse to enter into detailed debate with his critics after 1928. 43. Ibid., 975. 44. Ibid., 986. 45. Ibid., 978. 46. Ibid., 979. See Figure 1. 47
C. Williams (1918)
On the absorption of X-rays in copper and aluminiumProceedings of The Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 94
A. Dauvillier
Recherches spectrométriques sur les Rayons XAnnales De Physique, 9
C.G. Barkla and Phenomenon: the J A Case in the Treatment of Study Deviance in Physics Brian Wynne which have been the The of science is with claims replete history of heated Sometimes the of controversy rejection subject claims the orthodox is vindicated as ’revolutionary’ by relatively simple of the ’events’ come to explanations problematic subsequently light. Sometimes the or eccentric claims are initially implausible triumphantly vindicated as a either eats or doubting orthodoxy humple pie, attempts to the new wisdom as it has believed. But represent something always sometimes the eventual demise of an claim is surrounded unpopular by confusion of unsubstantiated and innuendo, assertions, inconsistency, the there often to be no consistent account of plain ignorance; appears claim’s in of and reasons terms strict rejection, predominant given rational criteria seem to further The may require ’J qualification. a set of claims and phenomenon’, complicated experimental pre- theoretical the British C.G. is a liminary forays by physicist Barkla, of a case on of the third It was a scientific ’error’ good example type. the of ’orthodox’ which lasted to fringes physics long enough generate over scientific The never received an fifty J papers. phenomenon final and clear in
Social Studies of Science: An International Review of Research in the Social Dimensions of Science and Technology – SAGE
Published: Sep 1, 1976
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.