Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Bakwin, S. Mclaughlin (1964)
SECULAR INCREASE IN HEIGHT IS THE END IN SIGHT?Lancet, 2 7371
Najjar Mf, M. Rowland (1987)
Anthropometric reference data and prevalence of overweight, United States, 1976-80.Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey, 238
M. Bernardi, D. Haider, C. Domenig, R. Ristl, M. Hagmann, M. Haisjackl, M. Hiesmayr, A. Lassnigg (2019)
Does the choice of intraoperative fluid modify abdominal aneurysm repair outcomes?Medicine, 98
H. Stoudt, A. Damon, R. Mcfarland, J. Roberts (1965)
WEIGHT, HEIGHT, AND SELECTED BODY DIMENSIONS OF ADULTS, UNITED STATES-1960-1962.Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey, 11
Alison Galloway (1988)
Estimating actual height in the older individual.Journal of forensic sciences, 33 1
J. Mccormick (1976)
Epidemiology—An Introductory TextThe Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 26
Recker Recker, Heaney Heaney (1990)
Letter to the editorJ Bone Miner Res, 5
Recker Rr, Heaney Rp (1990)
Age-related bone loss in women.Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 5
(1972)
lnvolutional osteoporosis
L. Melton, S. Kan, M. Frye, H. Wahner, W. O'Fallon, B. Riggs (1989)
Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.American journal of epidemiology, 129 5
S. Abraham, C. Johnson, M. Najjar (1979)
Weight and height of adults 18-74 years of age. United States, 1971-74.Vital and health statistics. Series 11, Data from the National Health Survey, 211
D. Robbins (1987)
A PROJECTION OF THE STANDING HEIGHT OF LARGE AMERICAN MALES FOR 1985, 1995, AND 2005
(1963)
The body sizes of tomorrow's young men
MF Najjar, M Rowland (1987)
Vital and Health Statistics, Series 11, No. 238
W. Givens (1967)
Letter to the editorCommunications of the ACM, 10
G. Bowles (1932)
New types of old Americans at Harvard and at eastern women's colleges
HW Stoudt, A Damon, R McFarland, J Roberts (1965)
Vital and Health Statistics, Series 11
This paper presents evidence that much of the high rate of age‐related height loss in women reported in cross‐sectional studies is actually a cohort effect rather than an aging effect. Data from a large cross‐sectional study of healthy, white American women indicate that there has been a gain in peak adult height of 1.0 cm per decade for several decades from 1900 through 1965. Data from the HES, HANES I, and HANES II studies concur on this point. By contrast, data from a longitudinal study of 191 healthy white U.S. women show only a trivial rate of decline from peak adult height in the fifth and sixth decades of life. In an unselected population, some apparent height loss with age is probably due to disease processes, such as vertebral collapse. Caution is needed in using aging to interpret differences in height and in height‐dependent variables, such as bone density, in cross‐sectional studies.
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research – Oxford University Press
Published: Oct 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.