Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. P. Burgess (2012)
Saul Kripke: Puzzles and Mysteries
Derek Green (2014)
Intentionality, Determinacy, and Rules: Kripke's Paradox and the Normativity of Intentional Content
M. Boyle (2009)
Two Kinds of Self‐KnowledgePhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 78
W. Goldfarb (1985)
Kripke on Wittgenstein on RulesThe Journal of Philosophy, 82
D. Dennett (1976)
The Identities of Persons
Adrian Haddock (2012)
II—Adrian Haddock: Meaning, Justification, and‘Primitive Normativity’Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 86
Kevin Falvey (2000)
The Basis of First-Person AuthorityPhilosophical Topics, 28
J. Cleve (1992)
Semantic Supervenience and Referential IndeterminacyThe Journal of Philosophy, 89
S. Shoemaker (2009)
Self-Intimation and Second Order BeliefErkenntnis, 71
D. Davidson (2001b)
Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective
Pamela Hieronymi (2008)
Responsibility for believingSynthese, 161
J. Perry (1977)
Frege on DemonstrativesThe Philosophical Review, 86
G. Evans (1982)
Varieties of Reference
Thomas Spitzley (2009)
Self-Knowledge and RationalityErkenntnis, 71
B. Gertler (2008)
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
D. Davidson (2001)
Freedom to Act
Stewart Cohen (1984)
Justification and truthPhilosophical Studies, 46
Baron Reed (2010)
Self-Knowledge and RationalityPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80
J. Bridges (2014)
Varieties of Skepticism
D. Davidson (2001a)
Essays on Actions and Events
M. Yamada (2010)
Rule following: A pedestrian approachPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research, 80
P. Horwich (1984)
Book Review:Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language Saul KripkePhilosophy of Science
T. Burge (2013)
Cognition through Understanding: Self‐Knowledge, Interlocution, Reasoning, Reflection
B. Gertler (2011)
Self‐Knowledge
José Zalabardo (1997)
Kripke's Normativity ArgumentCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 27
Hannah Ginsborg (2012)
I—Meaning, Understanding and NormativityAristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 86
T. Burge (2000)
Reason and the First Person
R. Edgley (1969)
Reason in Theory and Practice
Saul Kripke's influential ‘sceptical paradox’ of semantic rule‐following alleges that speakers cannot have any justification for using a word one way rather than another. If it is correct, there can be no such thing as meaning anything by a word. I argue that the paradox fails to undermine meaning. Kripke never adequately motivates its excessively strict standard for the justified use of words. The paradox lacks the resources to show that its standard is truly mandatory or that speakers do not frequently satisfy the well‐motivated competitor I offer. So the paradox fails.
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.