Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

An evaluation of territory mapping to estimate fisher density

An evaluation of territory mapping to estimate fisher density <jats:p> We evaluated winter-territory mapping as a method for estimating fisher (Martes pennanti) density in a 210-km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> survey area in north-central Massachusetts in 1994 and 1995 by comparing estimates with simultaneous camera mark–resight estimates. Assuming intrasexual territoriality and accounting for all occupied habitat, territories of resident radio-marked fishers were mapped (mean = 54% of all territories in the study area), and those of unmarked resident fishers were identified from tracks and photographs. The total number indicated a population of 40 (19/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 49 (23/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) residents for 1994 and 1995, respectively. Results from replicated automatic-camera capture–mark–resight surveys suggested slightly higher total numbers and densities of fishers in 1994 (44.5; 21/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 1995 (52.9; 25/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), but these estimates likely also included nonresident juveniles. Territory mapping and automatic-camera mark–resight methods resulted in very similar population estimates, but both require large numbers of radio-marked fishers to effectively detect small population changes (e.g., such as the 20% observed in this study). Individually marking animals would enhance mark–recapture estimates. </jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Canadian Journal of Zoology CrossRef

An evaluation of territory mapping to estimate fisher density

Canadian Journal of Zoology , Volume 79 (9): 1691-1696 – Sep 1, 2001

An evaluation of territory mapping to estimate fisher density


Abstract

<jats:p> We evaluated winter-territory mapping as a method for estimating fisher (Martes pennanti) density in a 210-km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> survey area in north-central Massachusetts in 1994 and 1995 by comparing estimates with simultaneous camera mark–resight estimates. Assuming intrasexual territoriality and accounting for all occupied habitat, territories of resident radio-marked fishers were mapped (mean = 54% of all territories in the study area), and those of unmarked resident fishers were identified from tracks and photographs. The total number indicated a population of 40 (19/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 49 (23/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) residents for 1994 and 1995, respectively. Results from replicated automatic-camera capture–mark–resight surveys suggested slightly higher total numbers and densities of fishers in 1994 (44.5; 21/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 1995 (52.9; 25/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), but these estimates likely also included nonresident juveniles. Territory mapping and automatic-camera mark–resight methods resulted in very similar population estimates, but both require large numbers of radio-marked fishers to effectively detect small population changes (e.g., such as the 20% observed in this study). Individually marking animals would enhance mark–recapture estimates. </jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/an-evaluation-of-territory-mapping-to-estimate-fisher-density-xAKbVyq3yS

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0008-4301
DOI
10.1139/z01-129
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p> We evaluated winter-territory mapping as a method for estimating fisher (Martes pennanti) density in a 210-km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> survey area in north-central Massachusetts in 1994 and 1995 by comparing estimates with simultaneous camera mark–resight estimates. Assuming intrasexual territoriality and accounting for all occupied habitat, territories of resident radio-marked fishers were mapped (mean = 54% of all territories in the study area), and those of unmarked resident fishers were identified from tracks and photographs. The total number indicated a population of 40 (19/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 49 (23/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) residents for 1994 and 1995, respectively. Results from replicated automatic-camera capture–mark–resight surveys suggested slightly higher total numbers and densities of fishers in 1994 (44.5; 21/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) and 1995 (52.9; 25/100 km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>), but these estimates likely also included nonresident juveniles. Territory mapping and automatic-camera mark–resight methods resulted in very similar population estimates, but both require large numbers of radio-marked fishers to effectively detect small population changes (e.g., such as the 20% observed in this study). Individually marking animals would enhance mark–recapture estimates. </jats:p>

Journal

Canadian Journal of ZoologyCrossRef

Published: Sep 1, 2001

There are no references for this article.