Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Impact of open-access scheduling on realized access

Impact of open-access scheduling on realized access Open-access or advanced-access scheduling, which opens the clinic calendar to patients without requiring them to schedule far in advance of the visit, is being introduced in primary care for the purpose of improving access. None of the evaluations reported to date have measured differences in actual visits that might be associated with different scheduling systems. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of visits to primary care providers for patients served by an open-access clinic with utilization patterns of patients served at clinics not using open-access scheduling. We hypothesized that the odds that a continuing patient received more than one primary care visit would be greater in the clinic where open-access scheduling was in use than in comparison clinics. Our study provides mixed support for the hypotheses. After adjustment for case mix, stable chronic patients treated in open-access clinics may sometimes have greater odds of receiving two or more preventive care visits. However, these effects do not occur in all clinics, suggesting that other clinic characteristics may overcome the effects of open-access scheduling. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Health Services Management Research SAGE

Impact of open-access scheduling on realized access

Health Services Management Research , Volume 20 (2): 6 – May 1, 2007

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/impact-of-open-access-scheduling-on-realized-access-xXGt8XH0uo

References (14)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2007 Royal Society of Medicine Press
ISSN
0951-4848
eISSN
1758-1044
DOI
10.1258/095148407780744679
pmid
17524225
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Open-access or advanced-access scheduling, which opens the clinic calendar to patients without requiring them to schedule far in advance of the visit, is being introduced in primary care for the purpose of improving access. None of the evaluations reported to date have measured differences in actual visits that might be associated with different scheduling systems. The purpose of this study was to compare utilization of visits to primary care providers for patients served by an open-access clinic with utilization patterns of patients served at clinics not using open-access scheduling. We hypothesized that the odds that a continuing patient received more than one primary care visit would be greater in the clinic where open-access scheduling was in use than in comparison clinics. Our study provides mixed support for the hypotheses. After adjustment for case mix, stable chronic patients treated in open-access clinics may sometimes have greater odds of receiving two or more preventive care visits. However, these effects do not occur in all clinics, suggesting that other clinic characteristics may overcome the effects of open-access scheduling.

Journal

Health Services Management ResearchSAGE

Published: May 1, 2007

There are no references for this article.