Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Four ways to choose a CEO: Crown heir, horse race, coup d'Etat, and comprehensive search

Four ways to choose a CEO: Crown heir, horse race, coup d'Etat, and comprehensive search Most attempts to understand CEO succession fail to adequately differentiate the various ways by which CEOs are chosen. This article presents a conceptual framework that identifies four kinds of CEO succession processes, distinguished according to two key factors: political dynamics (who rules?) and the candidate search (are preferences known in advance?). Our main point is that the response of organizational stakeholders to CEO successions—(a) whether the process is perceived as fair, (b) whether the chosen successor is seen as good for an organization's future, and (c) the extent of disruption attending the leadership change—reflects how the politics and the search are managed. How internal and external stakeholders respond to a CEO succession can affect a new CEO's capacity for exercising effective leadership. Examples of each type (Apple, General Motors, Kodak, and Procter & Gamble) are offered and implications are drawn for researchers and for human resource executives. © 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Human Resource Management Wiley

Four ways to choose a CEO: Crown heir, horse race, coup d'Etat, and comprehensive search

Human Resource Management , Volume 34 (1) – Jan 1, 1995

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/four-ways-to-choose-a-ceo-crown-heir-horse-race-coup-d-etat-and-ydWQIr3963

References (20)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 Wiley Subscription Services
ISSN
0090-4848
eISSN
1099-050X
DOI
10.1002/hrm.3930340109
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Most attempts to understand CEO succession fail to adequately differentiate the various ways by which CEOs are chosen. This article presents a conceptual framework that identifies four kinds of CEO succession processes, distinguished according to two key factors: political dynamics (who rules?) and the candidate search (are preferences known in advance?). Our main point is that the response of organizational stakeholders to CEO successions—(a) whether the process is perceived as fair, (b) whether the chosen successor is seen as good for an organization's future, and (c) the extent of disruption attending the leadership change—reflects how the politics and the search are managed. How internal and external stakeholders respond to a CEO succession can affect a new CEO's capacity for exercising effective leadership. Examples of each type (Apple, General Motors, Kodak, and Procter & Gamble) are offered and implications are drawn for researchers and for human resource executives. © 1995 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Journal

Human Resource ManagementWiley

Published: Jan 1, 1995

There are no references for this article.