Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Weiner, P. Kollman, D. Nguyen, D. Case (1986)
An all atom force field for simulations of proteins and nucleic acidsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 7
(1136)
J Comput Chem
(1987)
J Chem Soc Perkin Trans II
P. Charifson (1997)
Practical Application of Computer-Aided Drug Design
(2000)
Compound name Eexpt GAFF/RESP GAFF/AM1-BCC Econf1 Econf2 Ecalc Ecalc Eexpt Econf1 Econf2
J. Lii, N. Allinger (1991)
The MM3 force field for amides, polypeptides and proteinsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 12
(1998)
J. S.; Defrees, D. J.; Baker, J
(1984)
J Am Chem Soc
F. Mohamadi, N. Richards, W. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, C. Caufield, G. Chang, T. Hendrickson, W. Still (1990)
Macromodel—an integrated software system for modeling organic and bioorganic molecules using molecular mechanicsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 11
D. McDonald, W. Still (1992)
AMBER torsional parameters for the peptide backboneTetrahedron Letters, 33
A. Jakalian, D. Jack, C. Bayly (2002)
Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validationJournal of Computational Chemistry, 23
(1623)
J Comput Chem J Phys Chem Ref Data
P. Cieplak, W. Cornell, C. Bayly, P. Kollman (1995)
Application of the multimolecule and multiconformational RESP methodology to biopolymers: Charge derivation for DNA, RNA, and proteinsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 16
P. Schleyer (1998)
Encyclopedia of computational chemistry
Klaus Gundertofte, T. Liljefors, P. Norrby, I. Pettersson (1996)
A comparison of conformational energies calculated by several molecular mechanics methodsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 17
Two charge schemes, RESP and AM1-BCC, were studied and the RMS deviations to experiments are 0.47 and 0.52 kcal/mol for the two charge approaches
M. Clark, R. Cramer, Nicole Opdenbosch (1989)
Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force fieldJournal of Computational Chemistry, 10
T. Halgren (1996)
Merck molecular force field. I. Basis, form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94Journal of Computational Chemistry, 17
(1993)
J Phys Chem
M. Harmony, V. Laurie, R. Kuczkowski, R. Schwendeman, D. Ramsay, F. Lovas, W. Lafferty, A. Maki (1979)
Molecular structures of gas‐phase polyatomic molecules determined by spectroscopic methodsJournal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data, 8
P. Hobza, M. Kabelác, J. Šponer, P. Mejzlík, J. Vondrášek (1997)
Performance of empirical potentials (AMBER, CFF95, CVFF, CHARMM, OPLS, POLTEV), semiempirical quantum chemical methods (AM1, MNDO/M, PM3), and ab initio Hartree–Fock method for interaction of DNA bases: Comparison with nonempirical beyond Hartree–Fock resultsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 18
W. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. Bayly, P. Kollman (1993)
Application of RESP charges to calculate conformational energies, hydrogen bond energies, and free energies of solvationJournal of the American Chemical Society, 115
S. Weiner, P. Kollman, D. Case, U. Singh, C. Ghio, G. Alagona, S. Profeta, P. Weiner (1984)
A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSJournal of the American Chemical Society, 106
W. Cornell, P. Cieplak, C. Bayly, I. Gould, K. Merz, D. Ferguson, D. Spellmeyer, T. Fox, J. Caldwell, P. Kollman (1995)
A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins
M. Wolff, W. Foye, R. Southgate, N. Osborne, M. Pearson, G. Burton, S. Beecham (1996)
BURGER'S MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY AND DRUG DISCOVERY
J. Valverde (2001)
Molecular Modelling: Principles and ApplicationsBriefings in Bioinformatics, 2
A. Jakalian, B. Bush, D. Jack, C. Bayly (2000)
Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. MethodJournal of Computational Chemistry, 21
C. Baily, P. Cieplak, W. Cornell, P. Kollman (1993)
A well-behaved electrostatic potential-based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic char
N. Allinger, Kuo-Hsiang Chen, J. Lii (1996)
An improved force field (MM4) for saturated hydrocarbonsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 17
Junmei Wang, P. Kollman (2001)
Automatic parameterization of force field by systematic search and genetic algorithmsJournal of Computational Chemistry, 22
Junmei Wang, P. Cieplak, P. Kollman (2000)
How well does a restrained electrostatic potential (RESP) model perform in calculating conformational energies of organic and biological molecules?Journal of Computational Chemistry, 21
We describe here a general Amber force field (GAFF) for organic molecules. GAFF is designed to be compatible with existing Amber force fields for proteins and nucleic acids, and has parameters for most organic and pharmaceutical molecules that are composed of H, C, N, O, S, P, and halogens. It uses a simple functional form and a limited number of atom types, but incorporates both empirical and heuristic models to estimate force constants and partial atomic charges. The performance of GAFF in test cases is encouraging. In test I, 74 crystallographic structures were compared to GAFF minimized structures, with a root‐mean‐square displacement of 0.26 Å, which is comparable to that of the Tripos 5.2 force field (0.25 Å) and better than those of MMFF 94 and CHARMm (0.47 and 0.44 Å, respectively). In test II, gas phase minimizations were performed on 22 nucleic acid base pairs, and the minimized structures and intermolecular energies were compared to MP2/6‐31G* results. The RMS of displacements and relative energies were 0.25 Å and 1.2 kcal/mol, respectively. These data are comparable to results from Parm99/RESP (0.16 Å and 1.18 kcal/mol, respectively), which were parameterized to these base pairs. Test III looked at the relative energies of 71 conformational pairs that were used in development of the Parm99 force field. The RMS error in relative energies (compared to experiment) is about 0.5 kcal/mol. GAFF can be applied to wide range of molecules in an automatic fashion, making it suitable for rational drug design and database searching. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 1157–1174, 2004
Journal of Computational Chemistry – Wiley
Published: Jul 15, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.