Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Stevenson (1986)
A Discounting Model for Decisions With Delayed Positive or Negative OutcomesJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115
L. Green, N. Fristoe, J. Myerson (1994)
Temporal discounting and preference reversals in choice between delayed outcomesPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1
R. Strotz (1955)
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility MaximizationThe Review of Economic Studies, 23
G. Ainslie (1992)
Picoeconomics: The Strategic Interaction of Successive Motivational States within the Person
H. Rachlin, Andrés Raineri, D. Cross (1991)
Subjective probability and delay.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 55 2
H. Rachlin (1990)
Why do People Gamble and Keep Gambling despite Heavy Losses?Psychological Science, 1
K. Kirby, Nino Maraković (1995)
Modeling Myopic Decisions: Evidence for Hyperbolic Delay-Discounting within Subjects and AmountsOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64
George Ainslie (1974)
Impulse control in pigeons.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 21 3
S. Eysenck, G. Easting, P. Pearson (1984)
Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in childrenPersonality and Individual Differences, 5
N. Salkind, J. Poggio (1978)
Sex differences in impulsivity and intellectual abilitySex Roles, 4
J. Mazur (1987)
An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement.
(1992)
Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction ofsuc
H. Shefrin, R. Thaler (1977)
An Economic Theory of Self-ControlJournal of Political Economy, 89
(1981)
Self-control as response strength
L. Green, E. Fisher, Steven Perlow, Lisa Sherman (1981)
Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay, 1
H. Rachlin, L. Green (1972)
Commitment, choice and self-control.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 17 1
M. Stevenson (1993)
Decision making with long-term consequences: temporal discounting for single and multiple outcomes in the futureJournal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122
P. Samuelson (1937)
A Note on Measurement of UtilityThe Review of Economic Studies, 4
K. Kirby, R. Herrnstein (1995)
Preference Reversals Due to Myopic Discounting of Delayed RewardPsychological Science, 6
L. Green, J. Myerson (1993)
ALTERNATIVE FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF SELF CONTROLBehavior and Philosophy, 21
U. Ben-Zion, Ammon Rapport, Joseph Yagil (1987)
Discount rates inferred from decisions: an experimental studyManagement Science, 35
R. Thaler (1981)
Some empirical evidence on dynamic inconsistencyEconomics Letters, 8
Andrés Raineri, H. Rachlin (1993)
The effect of temporal constraints on the value of money and other commoditiesJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 6
G. Loewenstein, J. Elster (1992)
Choice Over Time
H. Rachlin (1992)
Diminishing marginal value as delay discounting. Special Issue: Behavior dynamicsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57
H. Rachlin (1992)
Diminishing marginal value as delay discounting.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 57 3
G. Ainslie (1975)
Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological bulletin, 82 4
J. E. Mazur (1987)
Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value
L. Green, A. Fry, J. Myerson (1994)
Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span ComparisonPsychological Science, 5
A. Logue (1988)
Research on self-control: An integrating frameworkBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 11
G. Loewenstein (1992)
The fall and rise of psychological explanations in the economics of intertemporal choice.
R. J. Herrnstein (1981)
Quantification of steadystate operant behavior
The independence of delay-discounting rate and monetary reward size was tested by offering subjects (N = 621) a series of choices between immediate rewards and larger, delayed rewards. In contrast to previous studies, in which hypothetical rewards have typically been employed, subjects in the present study were entered into a lottery in which they had a chance of actually receiving one of their choices. The delayed rewards were grouped into small ($30–$35), medium ($55–$65), and large amounts ($70–$85). Using a novel parameter estimation procedure, we estimated discounting rates for all three reward sizes for each subject on the basis of his/her pattern of choices. The data indicated that the discounting rate is a decreasing function of the size of the delayed reward (p < .0001), whether hyperbolic or exponential discounting functions are assumed. In addition, a reliable gender difference was found (p = .005), with males discounting at higher rates than females, on average.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.