Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Mccarthy (1988)
Evidence for modality-specific meaning systems in the brainNature, 334
E. Warrington, T. Shallice (1984)
Category specific semantic impairmentsBrain, 107
G. Miceli, M. Silveri, G. Villa, Alfonso Caramazza (1984)
On the Basis for the Agrammatic's Difficulty in Producing Main VerbsCortex, 20
K. Patterson (1978)
Phonemic Dyslexia: Errors of Meaning and the Meaning of ErrorsQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30
E. Warrington (1981)
Neuropsychological studies of verbal semantic systemsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 295
H. Goodglass, Clay Budin (1988)
Category and modality specific dissociations in word comprehension and concurrent phonological dyslexiaNeuropsychologia, 26
P. McKenna, E. Warrington (1978)
Category-specific naming preservation: a single case study.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 41
R. Mccarthy, E. Warrington (1985)
Category specificity in an agrammatic patient: The relative impairment of verb retrieval and comprehensionNeuropsychologia, 23
A. Caramazza, A. Hillis (1990)
Where Do Semantic Errors Come From?Cortex, 26
D. Baxter, E. Warrington (1985)
Category specific phonological dysgraphiaNeuropsychologia, 23
D. Rumelhart, James McClelland (1986)
Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations
E. Warrington (1975)
The Selective Impairment of Semantic MemoryQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27
E. Warrington, R. Mccarthy (1987)
Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration.Brain : a journal of neurology, 110 ( Pt 5)
T. Shallice (1988)
From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure
A. Basso, E. Capitani, Marcella Laiaconat (1988)
Progressive language impairment without dementia: a case with isolated category specific semantic defect.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 51
G. Sartori, R. Job (1998)
The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic informationCognitive Neuropsychology, 5
E. Warrington, R. Mccarthy (1983)
CATEGORY SPECIFIC ACCESS DYSPHASIABrain, 106
J. Hart, R. Berndt, A. Caramazza (1985)
Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarctionNature, 316
A. Caramazza (1988)
Some aspects of language processing revealed through the analysis of acquired aphasia: the lexical system.Annual review of neuroscience, 11
M. Silveri (1988)
Interaction between vision and language in category-specific semantic impairmentNeurocase, 4
C. Semenza, M. Zettin (1989)
Evidence from aphasia for the role of proper names as pure referring expressionsNature, 342
D. Allport, E. Funnell (1981)
Components of the Mental LexiconPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 295
Louise Zingeser, R. Berndt (1988)
Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications for models of language productionCognitive Neuropsychology, 5
THE analysis of neuropsychological disorders of lexical processing has provided important clues about the general organization of the lexical system and the internal structure of the processing components1–3. Reports of patients with selective dysfunction of specific semantic categories such as abstract versus concrete words4–6, living things versus inanimate objects7–11, animals12–14, fruits and vegetables15, proper names16,17 and so forth, support the hypothesis that the neural organization of the semantic processing component is organized in these categories. There are reports of selective dysfunction of the grammatical categories noun and verb18–21, suggesting that a dimension of lexical organization is the grammatical class of words. But the results reported in these studies have not provided unambiguous evidence concerning two fundamental questions about the nature and the locus of this organization within the lexical system. Is the noun–verb distinction represented in the semantic or in the phonological and orthographic lexicons? Is grammatical-class knowledge represented independently of lexical forms or is it represented separately and redundantly within each modality-specific lexicon? Here we report the performance of two brain-damaged subjects with modality-specific deficits restricted principally (H.W.) or virtually only (S.J.D) to verbs in oral and written production, respectively. The contrasting performance suggests that grammatical-class distinctions are redundantly represented in the phonological and orthographic output lexical components.
Nature – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 28, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.