Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Green, M. Snyderman
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Choice between Rewards Differing in Amount and Delay: toward a Choice Model of Self Control
Masato Ito, Kazue Asaki (1982)
Choice behavior of rats in a concurrent-chains schedule: Amount and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 37 3
D. Burns, R. Powers (1975)
Choice and self-control in children: A test of Rachlin’s modelBulletin of the psychonomic society, 5
D. Baer, M. Wolf, T. Risley (1968)
Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 1 1
E. Sarafino, Alyce Russo, J. Barker, A. Consentino (1982)
The Effect of Rewards on Intrinsic Interest: Developmental Changes in the Underlying ProcessesJournal of Genetic Psychology, 141
Carol Friedling, S. O'leary (1979)
Effects of self-instructional training on second- and third-grade hyperactive children: a failure to replicate.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 12 2
Dale Miller, Sue Weinstein, R. Karniol (1978)
Effects of Age and Self-Verbalization on Children's Ability to Delay Gratification.Developmental Psychology, 14
(1974)
Impulse control in pigeons.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 21 3
A. Finch, Maxine Wilkinson, W. Nelson, L. Montgomery (1975)
Modification of an impulsive cognitive tempo in emotionally disturbed boysJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 3
Shin-Ho Chung, R. Herrnstein (1967)
Choice and delay of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 10 1
James Grosch, A. Neuringer (1981)
Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 35 1
E. Heider (1971)
Information processing and the modification of an "impulsive conceptual tempo".Child development, 42 4
V. Douglas, Penny Parry, P. Marton, Chrystelle Garson (1976)
Assessment of a cognitive training program for hyperactive childrenJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 4
A. Logue, J. Mazur (1981)
Maintenance of self-control acquired through a fading procedure: Follow-up on Mazur and Logue (1978).
Mischel Mischel, Mischel Mischel (1983)
The development of children's knowledge of self‐control strategiesChild Development, 54
J. Solnick, C. Kannenberg, D. Eckerman, M. Waller (1980)
An experimental analysis of impulsivity and impulse control in humans.Learning and Motivation, 11
H. Abikoff (1985)
Efficacy of cognitive training interventions in hyperactive children: A critical reviewClinical Psychology Review, 5
A. Logue, T. Peña-Correal, Monica Rodriguez, Elise Kabela (1986)
Self-control in adult humans: variation in positive reinforcer amount and delay.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 46 2
W. Baum, H. Rachlin, H. Rachlin (1969)
Choice as time allocation.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 12 6
L. Green, E. Fisher, Steven Perlow, Lisa Sherman (1981)
Preference reversal and self control: choice as a function of reward amount and delay, 1
R. Walls, T. Smith (1970)
Development of preference for delayed reinforcement in disadvantaged children.Journal of educational psychology, 61 2
H. Rachlin, L. Green (1972)
Commitment, choice and self-control.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 17 1
G. Ainslie, R. Herrnstein (1981)
Preference reversal and delayed reinforcementAnimal Learning & Behavior, 9
J. Mazur, A. Logue (1978)
Choice in a "self-control" paradigm: effects of a fading procedure.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 30 1
W. Mischel, E. Ebbesen (1970)
Attention in delay of gratification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16
D. Navarick, E. Fantino (1976)
Self-control and general models of choice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2
D. Navarick (1982)
Negative reinforcement and choice in humansLearning and Motivation, 13
C. Ferster (1953)
Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement.Journal of experimental psychology, 45 4
E. Wender (1982)
Hyperactive Children: A Handbook for Diagnosis and TreatmentJAMA Pediatrics, 136
R. Herrnstein (1970)
On the law of effect.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 13 2
A. Logue, Monica Rodriguez, T. Peña-Correal, B. Mauro (1984)
Choice in a self-control paradigm: Quantification of experience-based differences.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 41 1
H. Abikoff, R. Gittelman (1985)
Hyperactive children treated with stimulants. Is cognitive training a useful adjunct?Archives of general psychiatry, 42 10
P. Bornstein, R. Quevillon (1976)
The effects of a self-instructional package on overactive preschool boys.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 9 2
E. Fantino (1969)
Choice and rate of reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 12 5
J. Yates, G. Revelle (1979)
Processes operative during delay of gratificationMotivation and Emotion, 3
W. Mischel, E. Ebbesen, Antonette Zeiss (1972)
Cognitive and attentional mechanisms in delay of gratification.Journal of personality and social psychology, 21 2
E. Fantino (1966)
Immediate reward followed by extinction vs. later reward without extinctionPsychonomic Science, 6
Green Green, Snyderman Snyderman (1980)
Choice between rewards differing in amount and delay: Toward a choice model of self controlJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34
G. Ainslie (1975)
Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.Psychological bulletin, 82 4
K. Coats (1979)
Cognitive Self-Instructional Training Approach for Reducing Disruptive Behavior of Young ChildrenPsychological Reports, 44
A. Millar, D. Navarick (1984)
Self-control and choice in humans: Effects of video game playing as a positive reinforcerLearning and Motivation, 15
We investigated a procedure to increase the selection of larger, more delayed reinforcers (i.e., more advantageous in the long run) over smaller immediate reinforcers, in an effort to increase a key aspect of self‐control in children. Six preschoolers, including one comparison subject, identified by their teachers as impulsive, were preassessed and found consistently to select smaller immediate reinforcers over larger, more delayed ones. The teaching procedure consisted of gradually increasing the durations of the delay interval over many sessions. The follow‐up assessments showed that 5 of these children increased the proportion of their choices of the delayed reinforcers. Before training, indifference points ranged from 1.7 to 51.7 s; following treatment, points rose to a range of 37.5 to at least 90 s, with 3 children preferring the larger reinforcer at all delay intervals tested. The results demonstrated the feasibility of teaching young children to make choices more advantageous to them in the long run.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 1988
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.