Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/american-psychological-association/intergroup-norms-and-intergroup-discrimination-distinctive-self-P3WtOnOnKJ
References (45)
-
S. Asch (1956)
Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority., 70
-
J. Israel, H. Tajfel (1975)
Criticism of a Social Science. (Book Reviews: The Context of Social Psychology. A Critical Assessment)Science
-
Rupert Brown (1984)
The social dimension: The role of similarity in intergroup relations -
H. Tajfel, M. Billig, R. Bundy, C. Flament (1971)
Social categorization and intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1
-
B. Doosje, N. Ellemers, R. Spears (1995)
PERCEIVED INTRAGROUP VARIABILITY AS A FUNCTION OF GROUP STATUS AND IDENTIFICATIONJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31
-
B. Mullen, Rupert Brown, Colleen Smith (1992)
Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integrationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 22
-
Michael Diehl (1989)
Justice and discrimination between minimal groups: the limits of equity.The British journal of social psychology, 28 ( Pt 3)
-
A. Lott, B. Lott (1965)
Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction: a review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variables.Psychological bulletin, 64 4
-
Gershon Bornstein, L. Crum, J. Wittenbraker, K. Harring, C. Insko, J. Thibaut (1983)
Reply to Turner's commentsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 13
-
H. Gerard, M. Hoyt (1974)
Distinctiveness of social categorization and attitude toward ingroup members.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29
-
(1993)
Us and them: The effects of categorization and interdependence on identification within, and differentiation between, categories and groups. Unpublished doctoral dissertation -
Gershon Bornstein, L. Crum, J. Wittenbraker, K. Harring, C. Insko, J. Thibaut (1983)
On the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigmEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 13
-
J. Turner (1983)
A second reply to Bornstein, Crum, Wittenbraker, Harring, Insko and Thibaut on the measurement of social orientations.European Journal of Social Psychology, 13
-
J. Turner (1975)
Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 5
-
M. Diehl (1988)
Social identity and minimal groups: The effects of interpersonal and intergroup attitudinal similarity on intergroup discriminationBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 27
-
Sonia Roccas, S. Schwartz (1993)
Effects of intergroup similarity on intergroup relationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 23
-
J. Turner, Rupert Brown, H. Tajfel (1979)
Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favouritismEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 9
-
L. Doob (1937)
The psychology of social norms.Psychological Bulletin, 34
-
H. Jennings, T. Newcomb (1943)
Personality and social changeAmerican Sociological Review, 7
-
H. Tajfel (1970)
Experiments in intergroup discrimination.Scientific American, 223 5
-
M. Billig (1973)
Normative communication in a minimal intergroup situationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 3
-
H. Tajfel (1984)
The Social Dimension: European Developments In Social Psychology -
(1992)
A developmental approach to group dynamics: A model and illustrative research -
A. Knippenberg, N. Ellemers (1990)
Social Identity and Intergroup Differentiation ProcessesEuropean Review of Social Psychology, 1
-
R. Spears, B. Doosje, N. Ellemers (1997)
Self-Stereotyping in the Face of Threats to Group Status and Distinctiveness: The Role of Group IdentificationPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
-
T. Pettigrew (1958)
Personality and sociocultural factors in intergroup attitudes: a cross-national comparisonJournal of Conflict Resolution, 2
-
M. Brewer (1979)
In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 86
-
A. Mummendey, H. Schreiber (1984)
Social comparison, similarity and ingroup favouritism-A replicationEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 14
-
J. Turner, M. Hogg, P. Oakes, S. Reicher, M. Wetherell (1989)
Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory.Contemporary Sociology, 18
-
J. Turner (1983)
Some comments on… ‘the measurement of social orientations in the minimal group paradigm’European Journal of Social Psychology, 13
-
M. Sherif (1937)
The Psychology of Social Norms -
Rupert Brown (1988)
Group Processes: Dynamics Within and Between Groups -
H. Tajfel (1978)
Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. -
William Austin, S. Worchel (1986)
Psychology of intergroup relations -
R. Brown (1984)
The effects of intergroup similarity and cooperative vs. competitive orientation on intergroup discriminationBritish Journal of Social Psychology, 23
-
M. Billig, H. Tajfel (1973)
Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 3
-
James Vivian, N. Berkowitz (1992)
Anticipated bias from an outgroup: An attributional analysisEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 22
-
A. Briggs (1967)
Personality and Social ChangeNature, 214
-
M. Hogg, D. Abrams (1993)
Towards a single-process uncertainty-reduction model of social motivation in groups. -
D. Messick, D. Mackie (2019)
Intergroup relations.Annual review of psychology, 40
-
V. Allen, D. Wilder (1975)
Categorization, belief similarity, and intergroup discriminationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32
-
M. Deutsch, H. Gerard (1955)
A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement.Journal of abnormal psychology, 51 3
-
J. Simpson, J. Simpson, S. Worchel, W. Wood (1992)
Group process and productivity -
James Vivian, N. Berkowitz (1993)
Anticipated outgroup evaluations and intergroup biasEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 23
-
Rupert Brown, D. Abrams (1986)
The effects of intergroup similarity and goal interdependence on intergroup attitudes and task performanceJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22
- Publisher
- American Psychological Association
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1996 American Psychological Association
- ISSN
- 0022-3514
- eISSN
- 1939-1315
- DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1222
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Manipulation of in-group and out-group norms of discrimination and fairness allowed for the operation of competing social identity principles concerning in-group bias, conformity, and group distinctiveness. The combined effects of these principles on in-group bias were first examined in a modified minimal-group setting (Study 1). Results demonstrated that participants’ allocation strategies were in accord with the in-group norm. Furthermore, dissimilar norms resulted in greater use of positive differentiation allocation strategies. However, in natural groups (Study 2), more in-group bias was found when both group norms were similar and discriminatory. The results confirm the importance of in-group norms and demonstrate differences between experimental and natural groups in the applicability of competing social identity and self-categorization principles.
Journal
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Dec 1, 1996