Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Mellenbergh (1982)
Contingency Table Models for Assessing Item BiasJournal of Educational Statistics, 7
J Douglas, L Roussos, W Stout (1995)
Journal of Educational Measurement
N J Dorans, AP Schmitt (1991)
Constructed response and differential response functioning: A pragmatic approach
W. Stout, Brian Habing, Jeffrey Douglas, Hae Kim, L. Roussos, Jinming Zhang (1996)
Conditional Covariance-Based Nonparametric Multidimensionality AssessmentApplied Psychological Measurement, 20
J. Douglas, L. Roussos, W. Stout (1996)
Item-Bundle DIF Hypothesis Testing: Identifying Suspect Bundles and Assessing Their Differential FunctioningJournal of Educational Measurement, 33
J. Douglas, W. Stout, Louis DiBello (1996)
A Kernel-Smoothed Version of SIBTEST With Applications to Local DIF Inference and Function EstimationJournal of Educational Statistics, 21
R. Nandakumar (1993)
Simultaneous DIF Amplification and Cancellation: Shealy-Stout's Test for DIFJournal of Educational Measurement, 30
N. Mantel (1963)
Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom
JO Ramsay (1993)
TESTGRAF; A program for the graphical analysis of multiple choice and questionnaire data
N. Dorans, Edward Kulick (1986)
Demonstrating the utility of the standardization approach to assessing unexpected differential item performance on the Scholastic Aptitude Test.Journal of Educational Measurement, 23
L Roussos, W Stout, John Marden (1994)
Analysis of the multidimensional simple structure of standardized tests using DIMTEST with hierarchical cluster analysis
H. Swaminathan, H. Rogers (1990)
Detecting Differential Item Functioning Using Logistic Regression ProceduresJournal of Educational Measurement, 27
Hsin-Hung Li, W. Stout (1996)
A new procedure for detection of crossing DIFPsychometrika, 61
PW Holland, DT Thayer (1988)
Test Validity
M. Reckase, R. Mckinley (1983)
The Definition of Difficulty and Discrimination for Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.
Anil Jain, R. Dubes (1988)
Algorithms for Clustering Data
N Mantel (1963)
Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom.: Extensions of the Mantel-Haenszel procedureJournal of the American Statistical Association, 58
F Samejima (1972)
Psychometric Monograph, No. 18
T. Oshima, M. Miller (1992)
Multidimensionality and Item Bias in Item Response TheoryApplied Psychological Measurement, 16
F. Kok (1988)
Item Bias and Test Multidimensionality
R. Shealy, W. Stout (1993)
A model-based standardization approach that separates true bias/DIF from group ability differences and detects test bias/DTF as well as item bias/DIFPsychometrika, 58
H Wainer, SG Sireci, D Thissen (1991)
Differential testlet functioningJournal of Educational Measurement, 28
R Shealy, William Stout (1993)
Differential Item Functioning
H. Wainer, S. Sireci, D. Thissen (1991)
Differential Testlet Functioning: Definitions and DetectionJournal of Educational Measurement, 28
H-h Li, R Nandakumar, William Stout (1995)
Use of SIBTEST to do DIF when the matching subtest is intentionally multidimensional
Gregory Camilli, L. Shepard (1994)
Methods for Identifying Biased Test Items
R. Zwick, J. Donoghue, Angela Grima (1993)
Assessment of Differential Item Functioning for Performance TasksJournal of Educational Measurement, 30
G. Masters (1982)
A rasch model for partial credit scoringPsychometrika, 47
R. Zwick (1990)
When Do Item Response Function and Mantel-Haenszel Definitions of Differential Item Functioning Coincide?Journal of Educational Statistics, 15
E. Muraki (1992)
A GENERALIZED PARTIAL CREDIT MODEL: APPLICATION OF AN EM ALGORITHMETS Research Report Series, 1992
P. Holland, Dorothy Thayer (1986)
Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure.
L Roussos, W Stout (1995)
DIF from the multidimensional perspective
Hua-Hua Chang, J. Mazzeo, L. Roussos (1995)
Detecting DIF for Polytomously Scored Items: An Adaptation of the SIBTEST ProcedureJournal of Educational Measurement, 33
R. Shealy, W. Stout (1991)
An Item Response Theory Model for Test Bias.
W. Stout (1987)
A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionalityPsychometrika, 52
E Muraki (1992)
A generalized partial credit model: Application of an EM algorithmApplied Psychological Measurement, 16
NL Allen, JR Donoghue (1994)
DIF Analysis based on complex samples of dichotomous and poly torn ous items
J Douglas, L Roussos, William Stout (1995)
Refinement of the Shealy-Stout multidimensional IRT model of DIF with practical implications
F. Samejima (1968)
Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scoresPsychometrika, 34
N. Mantel, W. Haenszel (1959)
Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease.Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22 4
Terry Ackerman (1992)
A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity from a Multidimensional PerspectiveJournal of Educational Measurement, 29
J. Ramsay (1991)
Kernel smoothing approaches to nonparametric item characteristic curve estimationPsychometrika, 56
F. Samejima (1972)
A General Model for Free Response Data.Psychometrika
W Stout, Louis Roussos (1995)
SIBTEST Users Manual. 1–68
L. Roussos, W. Stout (1996)
Simulation Studies of the Effects of Small Sample Size and Studied Item Parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel‐Haenszel Type I Error PerformanceJournal of Educational Measurement, 33
F Kok (1988)
Latent trait and latent class models
N. Dorans, P. Holland (1992)
DIF DETECTION AND DESCRIPTION: MANTEL‐HAENSZEL AND STANDARDIZATION1,2ETS Research Report Series, 1992
N. Dorans, A. Schmitt (1991)
CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE AND DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH1ETS Research Report Series, 1991
A multidimensional model of differential item functioning (DIF) developed by Shealy and Stout is presented. It explains how individual items combine to produce differential test functioning (DTF) at the test level. Recent developments based on this approach, including development of the DIF/DTF detection procedure SIBTEST, are surveyed. The Shealy-Stout model not only offers insight into how DIF can occur, but suggests methods for investigating the root causes of DIF, which are useful to both substantive and statistical researchers of DIF. This new modeling paradigm offers the possibility of the proactive reduction of DIF in tests at the item manufacturing stage. SIBTEST is a nonparametric procedure that both tests for and estimates the amount of DIF in an item or set of items while controlling inflated Type I error by using a regression correction technique. It is shown to perform as well as and in many realistic situations better than other popular DIF assessment procedures. Recent modifications to the procedure demonstrate that it can be an effective tool for examining both crossing DIF and, through the use of kernel smoothing, local DIF. The procedure has been extended for use with tests containing polytomous items as well as tests that are intentionally multidimensional. Many real and simulated data analyses are presented.
Behaviormetrika – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 1, 1996
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.